Clear WiMAX USB modem impressions
Clearwire (along with Sprint and Comcast, just to name a couple) has been fiercely expanding its WiMAX network across America for months on end now, and while select citizens in select cities have had access to the 4G superhighway for just over a year, we haven't actually had the opportunity to find ourselves in one of those locations for any amount of time. Until recently, that is. The Clear 4G service was lit up in Las Vegas late last year, which gave the Engadget squad just enough time to scrounge up a gaggle of Motorola 4G USB sticks and really test out the network while at CES. Meanwhile, the North Carolinians among us were also able to test the boundaries of the 4G patches that have been setup here, and we're finally ready to dish out a few opinions on the fourth generation of cellular data. Eager to know if it's the best thing since sliced bread the invention of the MP3? Read on to find out.
Unlike most 3G options, Clear's WiMAX solution can actually replace your home ISP. We'd probably recommend an at-home modem over a USB stick if you're going that route, but we suppose one could always shove their USB modem in their home desktop before hitting the web for the day. Our focus here is on the mobile side, but suffice it to say, if your home is within a well-covered patch of 4G, there's no reason you shouldn't considering ditching your existing ISP and giving this a shot. Granted, we wouldn't recommend that heavy users (particularly those who spend days on end uploading wacky YouTube HD videos) do such a thing, but for casual browsers the speed is likely to satisfy -- and it'll probably save you a buck or two in the end over what you're paying now.
The actual Motorola USB modem that we used was a 4G-only device, which makes it extremely limited when you're traveling. For example, if using a traditional 3G USB modem whilst in the backseat of a vehicle, it can automatically step down to 2G when you pass out of the city and into a more rural setting. It's typically seamless, and it enables one's internet experience to remain in tact even when jumping from one network to another. Unfortunately, this 4G stick is useless when traveling outside of a 4G coverage area; frankly, we'd recommend one of the 4G / 3G sticks if you're jonesing for something quicker, which will allow you to still surf at 3G speeds if you travel to an area that's outside of the 4G umbrella.
That said, the modem itself performed well in the 4G cities that we surveyed. Installation was a breeze on both Mac and PC platforms, and the bundled USB adapter enabled us to angle it as we pleased and prevented the stick itself from blocking our power ports when inserted. The connection management software was rather barebones, and it simply auto-searches and auto-connects to a network (at least on the Mac side) whenever it detects that a 4G device is present. Once connected, a row of lights informs you of your signal strength. And that's where things begin to get iffy.
More so than any 3G area we've ever been in, 4G connections just seemed overly finicky. We could literally move two feet from our current position and drop the entire signal, yet be downloading at blazing fast rates after we moved back and reconnected. We also found that the fringe areas of the posted 4G blankets are more "fringy" than those in the 3G world; unless you're in the heart of the city that Clearwire covers, you should probably expect spotty or intermittent coverage. As an example, the entire Engadget staff had full coverage (and great throughput speeds) while using 4G at our CES trailer; just a five minute walk away to the hotel brought about varied results.
I personally couldn't connect to Clearwire's network at all from my 18th floor room, while my Sprint 3G card hummed along fine; my good buddy and confidant Chris Ziegler had no issues hopping on the 4G waves from his 18th floor room that sat just a few meters down from mine. It seemed that our hotel luck was all over the place, with some connecting sans issue, some not at all and some with paltry rates and a signal that tended to drop with some level of frequency. We fully understand that CES was going on, but it's not like everyone has shifted to 4G handsets just yet -- in fact, we'd wager that the 4G network in Vegas was the lightest used during the show. We also had varying levels of success in hotel suites where press conferences were being held. Some of the team was able to liveblog entire pressers on 4G without a hiccup, while others just down the road couldn't find a signal at all to connect to (meaning we had to resort to 3G).
When we were able to nail down a solid connection, speeds were admirable. Not mind-blowing, but definitely a step up from the 3G rates that we've grown accustomed to seeing. On average, we were able to pull between 2,000 and 3,000Kbps down, while upload rates rarely topped 600Kbps. That's a fair bit less than those theoretical maximums (around half, actually), but since when has any internet service actually delivered those lofty peaks? We should also note that latency was far better on 4G than on 3G; we rarely saw ping times over 100ms, while our 3G test from a year ago rarely saw ping times under 150ms.
If you'll compare these rates to those found in the aforementioned 3G test, you'll notice that 4G is a lot more like 3.5G, so to speak. It's not going to smoke your HSDPA connection by any wide margin, and it's a lot more likely to drop out on you in our experience. Of course, one must remember than this technology is still in its infancy, and there are still waves upon waves of rollouts that need to happen before the level of infrastructure supporting it comes close to matching that already installed by 3G operators. Still, if you're looking to buy into 4G today, we can't recommend any solution that doesn't also offer 3G compatibility as a backup. In our testing, we found 4G networks to be far too spotty and unreliable to use as your sole mobile broadband solution. Even if your home or place of work is supposedly blanketed according to Clearwire, there's a decent chance that some rooms, corners and hallways won't be. 'Course, we'd be a lot more willing to forgive the shortfalls if WiMAX were available in more than a handful of cities, but hey, expansion takes time and money -- neither of which are particularly easy to come by these days.
Unlike most 3G options, Clear's WiMAX solution can actually replace your home ISP. We'd probably recommend an at-home modem over a USB stick if you're going that route, but we suppose one could always shove their USB modem in their home desktop before hitting the web for the day. Our focus here is on the mobile side, but suffice it to say, if your home is within a well-covered patch of 4G, there's no reason you shouldn't considering ditching your existing ISP and giving this a shot. Granted, we wouldn't recommend that heavy users (particularly those who spend days on end uploading wacky YouTube HD videos) do such a thing, but for casual browsers the speed is likely to satisfy -- and it'll probably save you a buck or two in the end over what you're paying now.

The actual Motorola USB modem that we used was a 4G-only device, which makes it extremely limited when you're traveling. For example, if using a traditional 3G USB modem whilst in the backseat of a vehicle, it can automatically step down to 2G when you pass out of the city and into a more rural setting. It's typically seamless, and it enables one's internet experience to remain in tact even when jumping from one network to another. Unfortunately, this 4G stick is useless when traveling outside of a 4G coverage area; frankly, we'd recommend one of the 4G / 3G sticks if you're jonesing for something quicker, which will allow you to still surf at 3G speeds if you travel to an area that's outside of the 4G umbrella.
That said, the modem itself performed well in the 4G cities that we surveyed. Installation was a breeze on both Mac and PC platforms, and the bundled USB adapter enabled us to angle it as we pleased and prevented the stick itself from blocking our power ports when inserted. The connection management software was rather barebones, and it simply auto-searches and auto-connects to a network (at least on the Mac side) whenever it detects that a 4G device is present. Once connected, a row of lights informs you of your signal strength. And that's where things begin to get iffy.

More so than any 3G area we've ever been in, 4G connections just seemed overly finicky. We could literally move two feet from our current position and drop the entire signal, yet be downloading at blazing fast rates after we moved back and reconnected. We also found that the fringe areas of the posted 4G blankets are more "fringy" than those in the 3G world; unless you're in the heart of the city that Clearwire covers, you should probably expect spotty or intermittent coverage. As an example, the entire Engadget staff had full coverage (and great throughput speeds) while using 4G at our CES trailer; just a five minute walk away to the hotel brought about varied results.
I personally couldn't connect to Clearwire's network at all from my 18th floor room, while my Sprint 3G card hummed along fine; my good buddy and confidant Chris Ziegler had no issues hopping on the 4G waves from his 18th floor room that sat just a few meters down from mine. It seemed that our hotel luck was all over the place, with some connecting sans issue, some not at all and some with paltry rates and a signal that tended to drop with some level of frequency. We fully understand that CES was going on, but it's not like everyone has shifted to 4G handsets just yet -- in fact, we'd wager that the 4G network in Vegas was the lightest used during the show. We also had varying levels of success in hotel suites where press conferences were being held. Some of the team was able to liveblog entire pressers on 4G without a hiccup, while others just down the road couldn't find a signal at all to connect to (meaning we had to resort to 3G).

When we were able to nail down a solid connection, speeds were admirable. Not mind-blowing, but definitely a step up from the 3G rates that we've grown accustomed to seeing. On average, we were able to pull between 2,000 and 3,000Kbps down, while upload rates rarely topped 600Kbps. That's a fair bit less than those theoretical maximums (around half, actually), but since when has any internet service actually delivered those lofty peaks? We should also note that latency was far better on 4G than on 3G; we rarely saw ping times over 100ms, while our 3G test from a year ago rarely saw ping times under 150ms.

If you'll compare these rates to those found in the aforementioned 3G test, you'll notice that 4G is a lot more like 3.5G, so to speak. It's not going to smoke your HSDPA connection by any wide margin, and it's a lot more likely to drop out on you in our experience. Of course, one must remember than this technology is still in its infancy, and there are still waves upon waves of rollouts that need to happen before the level of infrastructure supporting it comes close to matching that already installed by 3G operators. Still, if you're looking to buy into 4G today, we can't recommend any solution that doesn't also offer 3G compatibility as a backup. In our testing, we found 4G networks to be far too spotty and unreliable to use as your sole mobile broadband solution. Even if your home or place of work is supposedly blanketed according to Clearwire, there's a decent chance that some rooms, corners and hallways won't be. 'Course, we'd be a lot more willing to forgive the shortfalls if WiMAX were available in more than a handful of cities, but hey, expansion takes time and money -- neither of which are particularly easy to come by these days.




























@kalleboo So true. I'm confused by this so called "4G" network.
@unyari It's not 4G. I thought these people at Engadget would know better. WiMax is more of a fixed wireless than mobile broadband although the lastest revision 802.16e does allow for mobility. It's kind of inferior to LTE (which is not a full 4G technology either).
@kalleboo - Wow, I'm jealous. I'm lucky to get 600KBps down on AT&T here over 3G. EDGE is just a joke so I won't even mention those speeds.
Well I've got an account in Dallas and the service has been phenomenal since it's leveled out. Though, I am downtown and near a tower from what I've been told. My connection will vary from 8-10 mpbs constantly.
Is it for everyone? Well if you aren't near a tower I probably would stick to cable, but the option to have two connections for the same price as a single cable or dsl connection is a no brainer in my book.
I don't think this article goes into any detail of their "finicky" experiences.
A couple things to note:
Carriers use the lowest freqs they can get to offer better coverage in urban areas. The lowest WiMax band I've seen used is around 2.3GHz, not too good to penetrate walls. Thus to use WiMax effectively, either be in a open area or near a window.
When Clear first arrived in San Antonio/Austin (Nov 1 2009), the service was up and down for the first week which is expected for any new wireless service. (To allow the carriers to tweak their settings for the geographic region under heavy/moderate loading) Then Sprint launched their 4G service 15 Nov, which I was able to see a noticeable difference in throughput (Sprint uses Clear's towers) but it was still faster than any 3G data service.
I currently have the home modem, the motorola modem (as described in the article), and a Lenovo x200 with the Intel 5x50 WiMax chipset in PC (Windows 7 64bit, Windows XP 32 bit,and Linux with the Intel chip) and Mac ( OS X 10.5 and 10.6 ).
If I had input into Clear, I would suggest a new home modem (an outside modem that mounts on the roof and uses 4x4 MIMO antennas). This might help alleviate those that have a home and do not mind putting something on the roof in order to get more throughput than strategically placing the directional modem in a window.
Wait, I thought WiMAX was supposed to offer downlink speeds of up to 144 MBit/s. Now, of course you're not gonna get that, but I was hoping for at least 30-50% of it in areas with excellent coverage. I've gotten around 300KB/s with my 3G in Chicago and that's on a 7.2MBit/s HSPA, which equals 900KB/s, so I was happy to be getting a good 30% there. So I would hope to be getting like 5-6MB/s in an area with excellent WiMax coverage. LTE is supposed to deliver 360MBit/s and LTE Advanced up to 1GBit/S. Obviously you won't ever get that but I think it is reasonable to expect up to 50% of it in areas with excellent coverage. It might seem unrealistically high right now/too good to be true, but it'll take 3-4 years to deploy the network and it won't get upgraded for at least another 5, so by that time it won't seem that fast.
@Yankee My results are somewhat different than this reviewer. I live in San Antonio and I have always been able to get excellent signals. That said, I'm using 2 home modems (one for work, one for home), and when your tower goes down (no internet despite signal, or worse, no signal at all), I want to strangle someone. Also keep in mind that certain routers may not function properly if you get the home modem. At my office, my speed right now is...
[URL=http://www.speedtest.net][IMG]http://www.speedtest.net/result/697983019.png[/IMG][/URL]
Fairly typical result.
@michaelmclees Wrong link...
http://www.speedtest.net/result/697983019.png
@Yankee
All those numbers (wimax and LTE) are dependent on the spectrum channels used.
This is why Verizon's specified speeds for LTE are 5-12Mb/sec.
https://www.lte.vzw.com/AboutLTE/VerizonWirelessLTENetwork/tabid/6003/Default.aspx
No one has enough spectrum to offer anywhere near those theoretical speeds, even under ideal conditions.
My connection here in Philly has been great:
http://imgur.com/ZCQXE.png
Can travel around town and do anything I could do with my home connection. Very satisfied.
I actually signed up for Clear last weekend. They were going door to door and they caught me at just the right mindset. I got the home internet plus phone service. You only get the Motorola Wimax modem. (I had to go to Fry's to get a router.).
The salesperson: Why would you need a router?
Me: Because there are more than one computer in this home and sometimes I like surfing in a room other than where my desktop computer is.
Salesperson: Oh. I think we sell a router. [I looked online they sell a netgear... hell I can just pick up one from Fry's since that's in my neighborhood so I did].
My impressions? It's not bad. It seems pretty speedy unless you like to download lots of stuff then the speeds reminds me of the days when I have basic (a/k/a low speed) DSL. I supposedly have "Unlimited Download Speed" but it seems to only clock at 1.5Mbp in my neighborhood.
It's good to know that the usb modem with 4G only won't work very well... I almost got one and thought... nay... maybe later. The VOIP phone is okay. I don't use my phone much anyway.
But the price is about half of what I was paying on AT&T, so we'll see how it goes.
@barbtx
How many bars do you get? I'm always getting 4 or 5, and my speeds are quite incredible:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/698194474.png
@barbtx I should have posted this link in my last comment... I have had unending problems with my Netgear routers and Clear Home modems.
http://forum1.netgear.com/showthread.php?t=44482
It's a battle I've lost. Clear and Netgear won. I lost.
Nice review Darren. I'm a little surprised and disappointed by the results, but hopefully Clear continues to expand and improve existing coverage.
One thing to note is that Clear (or Clearwire as the company's name is) is the only actual 4G provider in the US. Sprint and Comcast are just re-selling and re-branding the Clear network. (Yes, both Sprint & Comcast are very large investors in Clearwire.)
I heard a rumor that the iPad will be getting USB ports in 2013 so this could work with it. I think you should have mentioned that in your article. Or maybe you should write a new article about this product and tie in a rumor about the iPad with it.
@sonicyoof Thing is, no one wants an Ipad. I have a small Ipod touch that can fit im my pocket, why would I need the same thing that won't? Ipad and Ipod, same thing, but ones bigger. I want flash.
I had clear when it first came out in las vegas, it was nice but then after getting overloaded the speeds suck.
I have the Clear Home..and my modem sits at like 2 out of the possible 5 "lights" or bars......never seen it jump to 5...steady connection and able to hold PS3
I used to work for Clear here in Chicago. Total bullsh1t company.
They are scammers.
I recently signed up for Clear in the Seattle area and I get fairly steady 5-7Mb/s down and 1Mb/s up. Ping times on the other hand are all over the board. Some pretty good times and some pretty bad ones.
I have the "guaranteed for life" price of $50 for both a USB mobile connection and a home router based connection. I am able to use my USB connection for most of my ferry commute to/from Vashon Island and get a little work done before reaching the office.
Wimax for Wichita Falls, TX. Speed 6899 kbps down, 523kbps up. I signed up for the 6mbps package, so I'm stumped. I recommend it to everyone, and I never lose coverage except when it first went to wimax about 5 months ago.
Is it just me or do the next / back links in the Engadget photo galleries not work?
Jacksonville, FL just started their WiMax Conversion.. 1st tower conversion just went up.. They are expecting the city to be complete by this summer.
I think I'll stick with FiOS for internet @home. It's really great -- it's also pretty friggin' close to the theoretical speeds Verizon markets.
CLEAR works extremely well for me in Georgetown, TX just N of Austin. I use it on a MacBook Pro. It is faster than the Verizon DSL Service which I finally disconnected yesterday after 5 excellent days with CLEAR. I use it at home and around Austin and San Antonio with a USB attachment and has me 90% satisfied.
If I'm in the middle of a large building 50 yards from the nearest window it doesn't receive a signal. However, neither does my Sprint Palm Pre so it has met my expectation. Hopefully CLEAR and iPad will form a working relationship...WiMax is the way to go!! Houston will apparently go live in early April.
This need more development. I bet 4G could get much better than the 3G in the coming days.
i've been using clear in las vegas since last summer and it works great all over the city. it's definitely slower than my cable modem at home, but for mobile internet it kills 3g. i just hope they expand coverage areas quickly to more cities.
I have been using Clear WiMax in Atlanta since mid June; been pretty happy with it. some latency and slowdowns during peak hours but fairly decent for browsing, online video, etc.
Looks like we got a speed bump in Atlanta; at 3:00am this morning my download speed on Clear WiMax home modem jumped up to a solid 12.5Mbps. :)
I've been using the USB modem all month...in fact just this minute.
The highest I've clocked it at is a blinding 9Mbps (that was inside a Starbucks...much better than their Wifi).
I've been using the home modem too and get between 4 and 6Mbps which allows me to stream Hulu and Netflix at any time of day, no "throttling".