@FrmrPSPCoderTOPAppStoreDev Too bad that's like saying no built in monitor = I'm not buying a desktop Apple won't include that until iPhone OS 4.5.2.7 (they had to update 4.5 twice to fix a fatal error that caused ipads to burn their users and then there were issues with the attempts to program a space age technology called flash into safari)
@FrmrPSPCoderTOPAppStoreDev Hey, it's a free country, brother. You can get all the Flash porn you want on that $300 netbook. Shoulda waited until after the iPad announcement. Same e-waste-ready netbook is probably $200 now.
What are you smoking? Sites don't use HTML 5. Sites use Flash.
This is why I hate standards-zealots. You people keep ranting and raving about standards that nobody uses whenever someone brings up a non-standard format that's part of the everyday lives of 99.999% of people who use the Internet. You expect the world to revolve around you and whatever you support, and you get pissy when it doesn't.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
NO FLASH = NO iPAD!!!
I'm not buying it. FLASH IS MUST.
@FrmrPSPCoderTOPAppStoreDev exactly. If a "revolutionary" internet device cant display internet content, than there is no point in it.
@FrmrPSPCoderTOPAppStoreDev
Too bad
that's like saying no built in monitor = I'm not buying a desktop
Apple won't include that until iPhone OS 4.5.2.7
(they had to update 4.5 twice to fix a fatal error that caused ipads to burn their users and then there were issues with the attempts to program a space age technology called flash into safari)
Might change my mind though, I want be part of the "Gold rush" AGAIN ;D
@FrmrPSPCoderTOPAppStoreDev
as much as I like flash. HTML 5 is becoming better than Flash.
@FrmrPSPCoderTOPAppStoreDev
HTML5
@FrmrPSPCoderTOPAppStoreDev Hey, it's a free country, brother. You can get all the Flash porn you want on that $300 netbook. Shoulda waited until after the iPad announcement. Same e-waste-ready netbook is probably $200 now.
@tylersmyler
HTML5 *IS* inferior to flash, and the specifications are set in stone then that's it.
@IvanP91 Yes, Flash is a must. Imagine, combined with Fart apps, we will have Flash-Farts... Wooohhooo la la la
@magallanes Flash Gordon (http://github.com/tobeytailor/gordon/) disagrees.
you know what else is better than flash? fucking blu-ray. what's wrong with blu-ray, again? oh, i know.
@tylersmyler
What are you smoking? Sites don't use HTML 5. Sites use Flash.
This is why I hate standards-zealots. You people keep ranting and raving about standards that nobody uses whenever someone brings up a non-standard format that's part of the everyday lives of 99.999% of people who use the Internet. You expect the world to revolve around you and whatever you support, and you get pissy when it doesn't.
Your hubris would make Achilles blush.
@Drybones5
You should check the compatibility chart before you think html5 is better overall.
@tylersmyler
forgot to add a link.
http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/html5.html