Klipsch Image X10i iPhone-friendly earbud impressions
We let you in on one of Klipsch's little secrets when we revealed the Image X10i to the world back in December, and now that the company's highest-end iPhone-friendly earbuds will be shipping en masse within a month, we figured we'd grab a set and let you know if they were indeed worth their weight in gold (or just $349.99, really). The X10 has sat atop the company's most recent lineup of earbuds for awhile now, and with the raging success of the S4i came a stellar idea: add the same iPod / iPhone remote to the flagship set of 'buds. The X10i is just that -- a set of X10 earbuds with the iPhone remote that we highlighted in our S4i review. Needless to say, the X10i isn't aimed at the budget-minded listener, but we were most curious to see if these really were worth the $250 leap from the aforementioned S4i. Read on to peek our conclusion.
If you've ever had the pleasure of listening to the X10 earbuds, then you'll know exactly what kind of sonic signature is presented here. The only new part will be the in-line iPhone remote, which functions exactly as the one on the S4i. That's to say that the volume up / down buttons will only function on the iPhone 3GS (sorry, iPhone 3G owners), but the play / pause / track skip center button works perfectly well on both handsets. In order to match the motif, Klipsch has added golden colored labels to the remote buttons -- a cute touch, for sure. The same tangle-resistant cabling is here, and the company tossed in a clothing clip that helps keep the remote (and in turn, the microphone that's positioned on the back side of it) exactly where you want it.
We tested out the headset on a few calls, and while we did have one person inform us that we sounded a bit quiet before we adjusted the mic a touch closer to our mouth (and stopped talking in our after-hours voice), we found someone else that had absolutely no issues hearing us. All told, this is definitely one of the nicer in-line microphones out there, and if you're looking to either avoid wearing a Bluetooth headset or simply find a decent mic within a more-than-decent set of 'buds, you'll probably have a tough time complaining with the package here. Is the X10i worth an upgrade if you already own the X10? Not in our estimation. Of course, if you can find someone who will pick your X10 up for a pretty penny, we'd definitely say that pulling the trigger on the X10i would make a lot more sense.
Now, for the newcomers. $349.99 buys you a well-designed box, a sleek hardshell carry case, an airplane socket adapter, a 3.5mm-to-1/4" adapter, the X10i, a clothing clip and a variety of single and dual-flanged ear tips. We ran through the full gamut of tips before decided that the medium dual-flanged tips suited us best, and after we were situated, we kicked back and enjoyed the dynamics. And trust us, there's plenty to enjoy. We did A-B comparisons with the $100 S4i in order to more accurately judge the differences between the two, and while the X10i wasn't tremendously better than the S4i overall, it's the subtle differences that'll win you over. Put simply, the untrained listener will probably not enjoy the improvements in the X10i, at least not to the point where they'd pay an extra $250 over the (admittedly stellar) S4i. The self-proclaimed audiophile, however, could very well find the X10i to be a far more delightful experience. The differences are most noticeable at the high end; on the X10i, cymbal crashes and wailing lead lines were handled with an impeccable amount of accuracy not found on the S4i. On the low end, we also found the bass to be a touch more punchy (and less boomy), but it's the clarity in the vocals and upper frequencies that floored us.
All things considered, it's impossible to recommend the X10i to anyone other than the most affluent among us. Like it or not, the S4i (if you're looking to stick with Klipsch, which ain't a bad choice in our own humble opinion) offers sound quality that'll be more than sufficient for the vast, vast majority of PMP owners. The extra $250 required to step up to the X10i can only be justified if a) money ain't a thang and / or b) you're one that genuinely appreciates hearing an absurd amount of detail in your music -- we're talking about stuff that you have to actively listen for in order to notice. If that's you, we're pretty darn confident that you won't be let down by the X10i, and hey, at least you've got a month to pinch those pennies before these float out the masses.
If you've ever had the pleasure of listening to the X10 earbuds, then you'll know exactly what kind of sonic signature is presented here. The only new part will be the in-line iPhone remote, which functions exactly as the one on the S4i. That's to say that the volume up / down buttons will only function on the iPhone 3GS (sorry, iPhone 3G owners), but the play / pause / track skip center button works perfectly well on both handsets. In order to match the motif, Klipsch has added golden colored labels to the remote buttons -- a cute touch, for sure. The same tangle-resistant cabling is here, and the company tossed in a clothing clip that helps keep the remote (and in turn, the microphone that's positioned on the back side of it) exactly where you want it.

We tested out the headset on a few calls, and while we did have one person inform us that we sounded a bit quiet before we adjusted the mic a touch closer to our mouth (and stopped talking in our after-hours voice), we found someone else that had absolutely no issues hearing us. All told, this is definitely one of the nicer in-line microphones out there, and if you're looking to either avoid wearing a Bluetooth headset or simply find a decent mic within a more-than-decent set of 'buds, you'll probably have a tough time complaining with the package here. Is the X10i worth an upgrade if you already own the X10? Not in our estimation. Of course, if you can find someone who will pick your X10 up for a pretty penny, we'd definitely say that pulling the trigger on the X10i would make a lot more sense.

Now, for the newcomers. $349.99 buys you a well-designed box, a sleek hardshell carry case, an airplane socket adapter, a 3.5mm-to-1/4" adapter, the X10i, a clothing clip and a variety of single and dual-flanged ear tips. We ran through the full gamut of tips before decided that the medium dual-flanged tips suited us best, and after we were situated, we kicked back and enjoyed the dynamics. And trust us, there's plenty to enjoy. We did A-B comparisons with the $100 S4i in order to more accurately judge the differences between the two, and while the X10i wasn't tremendously better than the S4i overall, it's the subtle differences that'll win you over. Put simply, the untrained listener will probably not enjoy the improvements in the X10i, at least not to the point where they'd pay an extra $250 over the (admittedly stellar) S4i. The self-proclaimed audiophile, however, could very well find the X10i to be a far more delightful experience. The differences are most noticeable at the high end; on the X10i, cymbal crashes and wailing lead lines were handled with an impeccable amount of accuracy not found on the S4i. On the low end, we also found the bass to be a touch more punchy (and less boomy), but it's the clarity in the vocals and upper frequencies that floored us.

All things considered, it's impossible to recommend the X10i to anyone other than the most affluent among us. Like it or not, the S4i (if you're looking to stick with Klipsch, which ain't a bad choice in our own humble opinion) offers sound quality that'll be more than sufficient for the vast, vast majority of PMP owners. The extra $250 required to step up to the X10i can only be justified if a) money ain't a thang and / or b) you're one that genuinely appreciates hearing an absurd amount of detail in your music -- we're talking about stuff that you have to actively listen for in order to notice. If that's you, we're pretty darn confident that you won't be let down by the X10i, and hey, at least you've got a month to pinch those pennies before these float out the masses.





























Anyone dumb enought to buy an ipod likely is dumb enough to overpay for these too. A sucker is born every minute.
@thetoad
"Now, for the newcomers. $349.99 buys you a well-designed box, a sleek hardshell carry case, an airplane socket adapter, a 3.5mm-to-1/4" adapter, the X10i, a clothing clip and a variety of single and dual-flanged ear tips"
Sums it up pretty much, the description starts describing the box, the freaking packaging. You are buying hype and marketing and eating it up. Sad
@thetoad
and you're dumb enough to post pointless comments. it's time get out your mom's basement and do something useful, other than hating Apple.
@thetoad What's wrong with an iPod? I admit that I’m definitely not a fan of Apple, but the iPod is the invention of the decade. Or maybe you mistyped an ‘o’ instead of an ‘a’…:P
@hbueain I don't agree with that whole "buying Apple = buying overpriced" fud, but anyone buying headphones these expensive are either pure audiophiles; or complete money-wasters. A well set $29 pair and a good EQ makes more sense, but that's just me.
@thetoad
You think everyone that bought an iPod is dumb. Wow.
I do think these are too expensive for earbuds, but it's not like this price point is something new. The iPod controls, however, are a fantastic addition. I often listen to music while working or exercising, and it's great to be able to seamlessly answer a phone call or control the iPod without having to touch the device.
@thetoad
everyday the same 50 idiots spamming apple hating comments. What the the world do to them to deserve so much hating?
I have the cheaper s4 one too and it's a great headphone, but $350 is a bit steep
Ipods are for noobs, here I'll pass you an ipAd to clean up that mess you made in your panties.
@ebgolfin Basically. It makes me wonder what you're really shelling out all that money for: the improved quality in audio, or aesthetics and player-buttons that have been on headsets for years.
@thetoad and you, I know you're new here, but the iPad joking is over. The iPod is for noobs? You sound like a pure troll, and whereas everyone has personal preference, yours is just moot. Stop spreading hate in Engadget. Or just do this http://www.engadget.com/exclude/ipod/
@N900
I been here for awhile actually. The ipad joke isnt over yet, it's just begun. Coutdown less than 60 days when the joke really starts and the thing flops hard.
@N900
Yeah, I'm not really convinced that there's a huge benefit to such expensive earbuds. Like anything though, there's plenty of enthusiasts that I'm sure are interested in stuff like this.
That said, I have a pair of Etymotic HF2's that I received as a gift. I think they retail around $150. I really enjoy how clear the treble and vocals come though on them. It's much better than the Apple supplied earbuds and the few pairs of $30-50 earbuds that I've accumulated over the years.
@thetoad
Just like the iPod failed? I mean, it's for total noobs right?
You are clueless. Go back to your cave.
@Choclatay
"everyday the same 50 idiots spamming apple hating comments. What the the world do to them to deserve so much hating?"
Here is a brilliant solution for EVERYONE.
STOP DOING IT PERIOD!
This goes for the people coming here to tell people that their iPod purchase is dumb.
The people going to Microsoft posts to tell those people that their purchase was dumb.
The people that go to Android posts to tell them that their purchase was dumb.
Or the PS3/Wii/Xbox folks that do the same thing!
No one side has some halo around there heads as some sort of victim of this type of nonsense. But if you are really a "geek" like I'm sure some of you fancy yourself as being them maybe some humility and restraint is more appropriate when it comes to your "opinion" of what you THINK someone should or should not buy or use.
@thetoad
Anyone dumb enough to make a comment like this is either deaf, broke or just hates his music.
@ebgolfin
Pretty much the ipod is a failure. Only people with IQ's under 90 and are worried about buying whats 'cool' buy those pieces of junk with sh8 sound quality. I'm certain you fit right into that category just fine, iTard.
@thetoad
I'm sure readers here will be able to quite easily ascertain who has the below average IQ around here.
Clearly you're trolling here, so this will be the last of my responses to you. Hopefully you sort out whatever the heck is wrong with you that fuels you to behave this way.
What a joke.
@thetoad
you give toad a bad name
now..... shut up
and go away
thank you
I have the s4i for my iPhone, it sounded amazing
@hbueain Does anyone ever remember that you are listening to lower then CD quality compressed MP3 files? Why would you spend this type of money if the source of the music isn't even that great?!?
@slapya
Says who? You? I only listen to lossy stuff when it's 1 - the only thing available, and 2 - when I have space constraints (like my cell phone that doesn't even have all of its 16GB card free). Otherwise, FLAC, ALAC, or leave me alone.
@slapya
I have a pair of UE 700 and that argument isn't definitive as even compressed music sounds better on good earphones than bad ones that don't have the same dynamic range, soundstage etc. These phones also insulate from ambient sounds which if anything will make you want to start listening to higher bit rate sampled music as you start to hear the flaws in your highly compressed music collection. I find that my UE 700's really start to flatter music once they get turned up fairly loudly although this causes fatigue.
Problem is, unless you are rich, expensive phones like these give you another expensive possession to worry about standing on, dropping, losing etc.
The problem has long since ceased to be data compression. The problem with all popular music mastered in the last 10 years is DYNAMIC compression. The idiotic "loudness war" has ruined music and made high-end equipment moot for listening to it.
@Information Central
Sadly enough, that is one of the biggest reasons why records sound better than re-released albums on CD. I am hoping that as more higher end iPhone compatible headphones come out, more people will care about sound quality, but I highly doubt it.
All of that packaging for some earphones?
@Exile
yes, but imagine paying $350 with normal packaging.. bad to worse
@Exile
Its all in the presentation Exile, all in the presentation. When someone is ponying up $350 for a set of earbuds I would think they are looking to be awed from the moment they open the box. Think of the packaging like a Wonderbra. Sure, the contents may be smaller than you originally thought, but the packaging is one of the things that gets your attention in the first place.
I may have to nominate myself for "Bad Analogy of the Month"...
@TheLoveDr
+1
Too expensive for my taste.
Those things oddly look like something that would be hanging off Peter North in an encounter with Jenna Jameson.
good choice on "the envy on the coast"...
@matty
I didn't think anyone off Long Island even knew who Envy on the Coast were. I grew up in the the same town as the lead singer (Ryan Hunter.)
But for the price it's worth to get a better pair of studio headphones, even though they may not be iPhone friendly.
@matty
I was just about to leave a comment about Envy On The Coast playing. Sugar Skulls, Mirrors, and Green Eyes Don't Lie are among my favorite songs ever.
@matty
funny - i went to hs w sal and jer
If anyone is seriously considering these I urge you to check out Sleek Audio's products instead. The SA-6's are probably the best earphones I've ever had in my life, and they come with bass \ trebble tips for customization, and they also come with 3 different sized earbud tips as well, and they are 100$ less than this product.
I would NOT recommend getting the wireless bundle with the SA-6's though. It's not really that great...not many improvements over A2DP and there is still a lag (latency) so they cannot be used for recording or live instrument playin.
Also if you are looking for something a little bit cheaper, check out the SA-1's...they're a very good product as well. I believe engadget has reviews for both the SA-6 and the SA-1's and they were both extremely positive.
@(Unverified)
The Klipsch earphone line is very mcuh respected as well for their sound, and then there's Ultimate Ears, Westone, and the new low-end custom manufacturers that are popping up every now and again. However, the old kings (UE-customs) and the new kid on the magic block (JH-audio) are pretty much setting the standards at the moment.
I would love to trade my UE-11's for a pair of JH-16's.
What's with the hiding replies all of a sudden? I remember when this site used to be better than gizmodo, but now you have the same biases and the shitty comment changing. What's next? Only letting people comment who agree with you, Joshua Diaz?
Strong work.
Although this is the second time in a week I've seen you use 'peek' rather than the standard slang 'peep' - as in "Peep Delta. We be flyin' all over this bitch."
Not a big deal, but if using 90's hip-hop slang is going to be codified as part of the "Engadget style," correct usage should be enforced.
@eyerot
"money ain't a thang"
@eyerot At Dellta, we luvs us some flyin'.
@DestrictoEnse
And the painfully awkward habit of referring to prices by rounding up to the nearest president... It just doesn't work in print.
But we only point these things out because we care.
Are there enough first-gen iPhone users out there that it's important to make iPhone-friendly earbuds? The 3G and onwards seem to handle most headphones perfectly well. I suppose it means they'll work on any device with a recessed jack, mind you...
@sockatume
I'm pretty sure they say "iPhone" because of the remote that's attached to the cord that lets you control volume, change tracks, answer the phone, etc.. I'm pretty sure Blackberry's do something similar, but most earbuds with these style controls advertise as being iPhone friendly.
@ebgolfin I am zero for two today. I cannot brain.
Can the iPhone (or any other PMP/phone) do $350 headphones justice?
@cashclientel
I guess if you rip your music in a lossless format then yes you should be able to take advantage of $350 headphones. Is it worth the $$$? Only you can make that decision...
@TheLoveDr And prevent wildfires.
@cashclientel
iDoubt
@cashclientel
without a dedicated chip then no.
@magallanes
i would assume that on top of ripping all the music u have in lossless format, u'd also need to bypass that lousy DA converter that most phones/pmps have to drive ur earbuds.