Wait editors- you forgot to mention multitouch in this topic! I call pod-people - there is no way this thread would have been published unless we mentioned multitouch - the single most important feature to the engadet folks.
Mind you, I'm not against multitouch but I find the recent webcast with the folks at google unpleasant to watch as engadget kept bludgeoning that poor dead horse when there were so many other topics that never got asked as all the time was wasted on multitouch.
@boe You're right, lack of multitouch is largely irrelevant. We have ten fingers -- why would you want to or need to use more than one on a screen at a time? Just silliness, really. It's like those people who claim the iPhone misses out because it doesn't have multitasking. We have one set of eyes -- who can do more than one thing at a time? Unbelievable.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Wait editors- you forgot to mention multitouch in this topic! I call pod-people - there is no way this thread would have been published unless we mentioned multitouch - the single most important feature to the engadet folks.
Mind you, I'm not against multitouch but I find the recent webcast with the folks at google unpleasant to watch as engadget kept bludgeoning that poor dead horse when there were so many other topics that never got asked as all the time was wasted on multitouch.
@boe You're right, lack of multitouch is largely irrelevant. We have ten fingers -- why would you want to or need to use more than one on a screen at a time? Just silliness, really. It's like those people who claim the iPhone misses out because it doesn't have multitasking. We have one set of eyes -- who can do more than one thing at a time? Unbelievable.
/sarcasm