Palm boss Rubinstein sends letter to employees, talks turnaround
Team,
This morning we announced preliminary results for our 2010 third quarter. Since the quarter has not yet closed, it is too soon to offer exact numbers, but we stated that we expect to report revenues for Q3 between $300 and $320 million. We also announced that we expect our revenue for this fiscal year to fall below the guidance we gave to Wall Street, which ranged from $1.6 to $1.8 billion. As we mentioned in our press release, our softer than expected performance is due to slower than expected customer adoption of our products, which in turn has prompted our U.S. carrier partners to put additional orders on hold for the time being. On a positive note, we expect to exit the quarter with over $500 million in cash on our balance sheet. We're scheduled to announce our full financial results in March.
I realize this news is difficult to swallow. We made this announcement today to prevent a surprise for Wall Street when we announce quarterly earnings in March. In the meantime, the entire executive team has been working extremely hard to improve product performance, and have implemented a number of initiatives to increase awareness and drive sales.
Dave Whalen and I just returned from a very successful meeting with Verizon Wireless, where they acknowledged that their execution of our launch was below expectations and recommitted to working with us to improve sales. To accelerate sales, we initiated Project JumpStart nearly three weeks ago. Since then, nearly two hundred Palm Brand Ambassadors, supplemented by Palm employees from Sunnyvale, have been training Verizon sales reps across the U.S. on our products. Early results from the stores have already shown improvement on product knowledge and sales week over week. You may have also seen a growing number of Palm ads on billboards, bus shelters, buses, and subway stations-all getting the word out about Palm.
All of these efforts are examples of how we are working to accelerate adoption and grow distribution of webOS. In the next few weeks, your management will work with you to make sure your priorities are laser-focused, primarily on helping to increase sales, improve product quality and differentiate the Palm product experience.
Our goals are taking longer than expected to achieve, but I am still confident that our talented team has what it takes to get the job done.
We'll schedule an all-hands meeting after our earnings announcement in March, and I'll be happy to answer your questions.
Go team!!!
jon























unfortunately, 500 mil in this business ain't much
@nicholasphan But it's probably enough to buy them another year or two, and that might be sufficient to get them in enough markets with more mature products to stay in the game.
Palm doesn't have to be #1...or even #3...to succeed. But yes, it's a tough market and Palm is clearly the tiniest competitor still making a go of it.
If for no other reason than Americans' passion for the underdog, shouldn't a lot of us be rooting for Palm to hang in there?
@nicholasphan
Correct, but if executed with an ongoing campaign just as they did when the Pre launched, Palm should still have a beating pulse. Besides, Palm is contouring to their market, as opposed to "....Who needs Flash? HTML5 is just a stones-throw away!"
@nicholasphan 500 mil for palm is enough! maybe not for verizon though!
@nicholasphan
If I were a Palm Employee, I'd be 'laser-focused' on updating my resume...
@nicholasphan
RIM, iPhone, Android (especially Droid) all have target markets and therefore a reason to exist.
The problem with Palm is they never knew who their customers were and never targeted them with a compelling device.
Sorry guys just saying its "better than an iPhone" isn't a marketing strategy and shafting your Palm OS users wan't such a smart move either.
Palm have a choice:
1. Identify a segment and target them with a compelling handset/OS.
2. Start the cost cutting
The Rube will be heading back to the beach within 18 months and the dick-head at Elevation partners might need to take a calmative and explain to investors how they burned through hundreds of millions of their money.....
Does anyone know how much cash do they burn a month? I doubt they are cash positive, so the slightly delayed Palm death watch continues .....
.
@nicholasphan I seriously hope its enough to get the Pre and the Pixi to India and China. Trust me, thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, will lap it up.
@scottkrk Thing is, at it's core it IS better than iPhone. It does so much well it's incredible. More WebOS in more hands will help. Either through better partnerships or even opening WebOS to manufacturers like HTC Samsung and Sony to name a few. I think it' s partnerships and timing that have been hurting therm most.
@nicholasphan
And most of that $500M+ came directly from last September's stock sale ($360M), when it was priced at $16.25/stock. Can you imagine how those investors must feel right now, that the stock has drifted below $7?
@Thor e
I agree the hardware appears to be one of their biggest problems.
Palm probably thought they were taking the best hardware components from BlackBerry and iPhone and making the ultimate form factor to please everyone. Well guess what you can't please everyone, so what they ended up with was a hybrid that was not as good as a BlackBerry or an iPhone.
500 million in the bank and 400 million in debt and ongoing expenses eating up what's left.
Minor details left out of his memo, huh?
Kind of like the "debunked" OTR Global report response, huh?
Perhaps Engadget should issue a very public retraction of that "debunk" article, too?
Nah, ain't gonna happen - don;t have to do that on the 'Net.
Mr Rubinstein,
Please do make a peeblesque 1280x800 resolution (the 800 is handy for portrait webbrowsing), oled, multitouch, sd card slot, nvidia tegra2 powered, wirelessN, webOS, and find a way to transparently run androidapps (icing on cake).
Later you can launch Pre2 with no physical keyboard, a bigger screen, and wvga res (soft keyboard makes it flexible to expand to other countries).
All of this is useless, unless you launch worldwide.
I think the only problem with Palm is that they didn't release the Pre before the iPhone. Other than that I don't know why everyone is giving apple so much love and so little to Palm.
@madwh that comment is slightly sarcastic and why can't I edit my comments???
@madwh I think this comment is fo real.
@madwh releasing the pre after the iphone isnt the problem. them releasing the pre at all... well that did it. the pre and pixi and the pluses whatever are macho chumps and i dont like the style if u know what i mean. too bad that the apple is even worse looking and getting somuch RANK!
@Mack Stone
What can you say.... seems the world is on crazy pills. Iphone is a seriously lacking device compared to what's available right now but lemming people still buy because it's marketed to death. I sir, am as confounded as you are.
@Thor e
It's only lacking the features that you personally want in a phone, which obviously only represents a small number of customers. The iphone has everything that the average user is looking for, myself included. I've had many phones, palm, G1, as well as many others. I have still to find a phone that could compare to the iphone. So hate it all you want, but, women lie, men lie, numbers don't. And the iphone's numbers are shi***** on everyone.
@Thor e
marketed to death? Looks like you confused it with the droid! Sounds great on paper but less than mediocre implementation on reality when it comes to camera (nice resolution, poor quality), media player( worst in class), email (worst exchange integration), keyboard (barely usable physical keyboard), freezes (daily reboot)...ok the screen is nice. Note the iPhone does everything thing well. No flash? But it has the best pandora and YouTube players. No multi tasking? But it is the phone least likely to freeze and crash and has multitasking with perhaps the best inbuilt aps for web browsing and media player in the industry. Smoothest navigation and on screen keyboard? Yup. That's iPhone too!
Time to realize people buy the iPhone because it just works well. It isn't a Hummer. Phones like the Droid are purely image phones. Sort of a man's tool.
@Mack Stone do we need an iphone killer?
Unfortunately, the iPhone is anchored to AT&T (in the US) and that's reason alone not to get one. Until that changes.
@madwh They need more devices of different formats, so everyone can get what they want. The Pre as a device sucks. Web OS is brilliant.
@genomecop
I don't think we need an iPhone killer by any means, it has simply created an ecosystem tailored to the average consumer. The marketing is near flawless.
But I would think just like any truly successful revolution, there has to be an uprising. If the king - (iPhone) goes down, the consumer market will have to cross a bridge of persuasion that could be extremely motivating for everyone in 'the game.'
We're making so much progress, but there is so little response from the consumers as they are tranquilized by iPhones simple (accentuate simple...) brilliance.
Perhaps they should try NOT marketing the Pre towards only women. Because we all know women don't know what they want.
@Dustin Leiblein Verizon's fault. Did you actually think that Palm payed for that crap :D.
@Dustin Leiblein
Perhaps Verizon shouldn't slap a frakin' $350 etf on the phone. Maybe they would sell a couple.
@The Shadow Who paid for the disturbing, pale actress promoting their Sprint launch?
Release it under GSM with preferably larger screen options. Stop messing around with limited CDMA markets only.
@Luxury Guy that doesnt make any difference. noone cares about gsm or cdma. they care about which phone is on the carier they are currently on.
@Luxury Guy... Well, if they could get a GSM Pre available as a capable iPhone replacement for everyone like me that just wants a phone that only plays the caller ID beep when it's my caller ID, then they could eek out a win that way.
@Luxury Guy
i agree! theres a reason why companies make phones for the gsm market because the whole world is practically on gsm!
why just made the Pre only on Sprint?? why not flood the whole damn market on every carriers in the known universe??? its as if Palm doesnt wanna win.
@Luxury Guy Exactly. Release it in GSM and explore a little outside the american market. That would help the sales a lot. I for one am waiting for a GSM Pre for ages.
@emopoops
it makes monster difference.you are being USA centric.
@emopoops
I care about GSM. I would have snapped the plam pre up in a minute if it were released here in Australia. I was even running the emulator on my PC for a while as my email client!!
It was to be my next phone after the iphone. Well, palm, to late. An android, or more likely a windows phone will be next given they are actually being released here.
@Luxury Guy I agree.. the biggest fails have been sticking to their ancient 320x480 screen factor and limiting themselves to CDMA. What more can you do design in "I want to cancel?"
@NuShrike GSM don't frickin' matter. Nobody's buying the Pre in Germany and it's available here.
That should make the phone seem more badass. Naming it the Pre didn't help. Sounds like make-up AND the phone LOOKS like a portable make-up kit.
@Dustin Leiblein
i didnt think of it that way, but your kinda right about it looking like a portable make up package. I wonder if Robinstein and Jobs still talk....
hey jon......bigger screen!!!!!! pixi form factor maybe???? and mayb no keyboard....its like buying a new tv bigger is almost always better thats just the bottom line.....thats whut people want so give it to us already..so i can stick with palm and not jump ship
@jflo86 So you want it to be an iPhone?
Come on, the whole point of the device it that it has a keyboard. Also, if you actually test the device even the Pixi's screen is a sufficient size.
@jflo86
i dont know why you are complaining about the screen size. unless you are talking via bluetooth, a huge screen is very uncomfortable up against your ear and cheek. the HTC touch pro 2 screen is amazing but it felt like a brick up against my face. some of the earlier blackberries actually hurt too because they were too wide to talk for long periods.
i found the Pre screen to be perfect...not too big, not too small.
@The Shadow well yeah who doesnt??? iphone is top dog in most peoples eyes and has been sence it came out, but not every one can afford to put out 120+ for a phone every mounth if the iphone where on diff carriers at least top three(sprint) every one would have it... there are some who would rather have blackberry, and ect... but in the big picture thats whut everyone wants....i have a pre and i got it when it first came out...and am now on my 7th one the pixi has better form but needs a bigger screen
A tip for Palm; don't involve moms or strange women from another dimension in the new ad campaigns.
@TheGM
The whacked-out ad campaigns are a function of a phone that had no targeted audience and no compelling reason to exist.
I agree the ad campaigns are terrible but how would you try and advertise this phone? It tried to be the best of iPhone and Blackberry and ended up being better than neither of these devices.
RIM and iPhone have clear benefits and targeted audiences.
Verizon have spent a lot of money on the Driod, and M$ are M$ so WinMo7 has a good chance. PalmOS has no clear benefit or audience and therefore no compelling reason to exist.
I think launching on Sprint initially was their first mistake.
@Dustin Leiblein and you think they had a lot of options? At&t has the iphone and verizon was pushing storms and an apparently working towards the droid.
I'm sure both offered them the crappiest deal ever, if they even made an offer.
@Dustin Leiblein
Like they had a choice?
ppft.
Their product deserves better than what they have got. Seriously speaking, Verizon and Palm both dropped the ball on their advertisements and we as consumers risk loosing one of the best OSs on the market.
It has become very obvious that Palm might not have the resources to develop both hardware and software at a pace which can keep up with competition. It really needs to think about licensing out their OS like Microsoft. It should also really think about going to developing nations like China, Brazil and India and try to exploit those markets as those markets arent fully developed and they can get at least a mindshare of the average consumer at lower budgets.
They have and can do well in both departments but I am afraid not a pace of the competition. I think Apple really cut deep into the flesh when they sold the 8GB iPhone at 99$.
@arnavdesai
Not just developing markets, bring it to Japan too please. By limiting the countries to mostly Roman alphabet countries, Palm is reducing it's potential to profit. I understand East Asian character sets are about 300 times more complicated to do than Roman ones but most of the work needed to be done to support them has already been done on Linux. They're loosing money by not adding them.
@DDragon, that requires a lot of work on their part, each new language requires resources in the country and lots of development hours. Nothing wrong with the language it's just too verbose for such a small company like Palm to spend time on.
Leave it up to Windows Phone 7 Series to bring the next operating system to these Asia pacific markets. It's going to be interesting the language base Microsoft includes at least then you know Japan is a given.