Lensbaby Composer, Fisheye and Soft Focus review: creativity abounds

Lensbaby lenses have been out and about for a long while now, but we were just recently able to sit down with a few of the company's best and brightest in order to form our own opinions of the (admittedly overlooked) creative devices. For those unaware, Lensbaby makes a handful of lenses and optics that help users engage in selective focus photography, and frankly, create all sorts of wild images that would be otherwise difficult or impossible to create within Photoshop. There's no question that these are hobby lenses through and through -- you wouldn't want to hinge your business on these -- but are they worth the comparatively low asking prices? Read on to find out.

Lensbaby Composer, Fisheye and Soft Focus unboxing

If you're into lomography, you'll likely be into Lensbaby lenses. Put as simply as possible, the company's stable of lenses, optics and accessories are all engineered to drag out the creative soul you've been stifling for so long, and in our experience, they accomplish that goal. We tested out the Composer lens -- a 50mm device that tilts in order to selectively blur your subject(s) -- and a trio of optics: Double Glass, Fisheye and Soft Focus. One of the many things that makes this system unique is the ability to simply drop a new optic into the lens in order to open up a whole new world of possibilities; in other words, you'll never actually have to change the lens itself (only the drop-in "optic") in order to switch from fisheye to soft focus.

Composer impressions

Let's start with the Composer, a $270 lens that can be ordered for use with Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax, Samsung, Olympus and Panasonic cameras. Said unit ships with an $85 Double Glass optic, which can be tweaked further by a set of included magnetic aperture rings. It should be noted that this lens requires full-on manual control on many cameras (the D90 included), while we were able to shoot in Programmed Auto mode on our splendiferous D3S. We loved the light weight of the lens and the stubby nature, though we did long for an easy way to see when you had the tiltable tube fixed in the center; there's a ring that you can tighten in order to keep it locked, but finding the exact center is practically a crapshoot. Inserting and removing optics from the lens was a cinch, as you simply use the lid of your next lens as the removal and entry tool. We'll be frank -- it took us a minute to figure out how exactly the process worked, but it's certainly intuitive once you stop thinking about the attachment process involved with your standard Nikkor lens and start thinking like a "real artist."

Double Glass impressions

The Double Glass that's included with the Composer was easily our favorite of the optics we tried. Sharpness was way better than expected, and the drop-in aperature rings allowed for all sorts of imagination-filled shots. We tended to prefer the F/4 ring for our style, but we definitely appreciate the options that are bundled in. We should note that the use of this does require a leap of faith from the camera operator, and if you've had your DSLR wheel locked on "Automatic," you'll definitely be outside of your comfort zone in the beginning. Once you work with ISO ranges and shutter speeds, though, you'll quickly learn to appreciate just how much this setup is teaching you about your camera. In fact, we'd argue that using this has the potential to make you a better overall photographer, as the crutch known as "Auto Mode" is forcefully removed. Have a look at some sample shots we snapped with the Double Glass below on our duo of Nikons (all of which are unedited save for resizing).

Lensbaby Double Glass optic sample images

Fisheye impressions

We were giddy with anticipation before using the 12mm Fisheye optic ($150), but unfortunately, we can't say we came away floored with the performance. Granted, it's a $150 fisheye (compared to "real" fisheye lenses costing hundreds or thousands of dollars), so we can't reasonably expect it to perform at an exceptionally high level. The biggest annoyance was the inability to completely filter out the darkened edges, and the sharpness level was certainly well below the Double Glass that we'd already fallen for. Still, we managed to eke out a few smile- worthy shots in the right circumstances -- have a look below to see if it's your cup of tea.

Lensbaby Fisheye optic sample images

Soft Focus impressions

Finally, we spent a solid week trying to figure out where the Soft Focus optic fit in our life. Truth be told, we never found it. We suspect this one is designed for those Gone With The Wind shots, but we had a bear of a time finding the right controls needed to extract a pleasant shot. The Double Glass was a far easier (and more forgiving) optic to handle, though we suspect the payoff would be worth it if you really put the time into mastering this guy. Priced at $90, we'd have more difficulty recommended this one, and beyond that, the effect here is far easier to replicate in post-processing than the one seen in the Double Glass. Have a glance at a few sample shots below to see if you agree / disagree.

Lensbaby Soft Focus optic sample images

Wrap-up

So, is a Lensbaby system for you? If you're bored with your current crop of lenses, and you've no interest in plunking down over a grand for yet another piece of glass, these lenses and optics are absolutely worth a look. We wouldn't necessarily recommend the Fiseye and Soft Focus optics for everyone, but the Composer -- which ships with the lovely Double Glass optic -- is a winner in our eyes. It opens up a pretty fantastic realm of creative options, and it worked well on both DX and FX bodies that we tested it on (D90 and D3S, respectively). It's important to keep in mind that these are just hobby lenses at heart, but we'll be candid with you -- we had an awful lot of fun shooting through these. Our pup, however, didn't seem to share our enthusiasm.

[Jo365 Posted Mar 16th 2010 6:18AM]

You either like the Lensbaby look or you don't - there is no middle ground with this lens. It's more suited to certain types of photography - the obvious ones being wedding and portrait, nature and and of course fine art. But I have also seen pro photograhers use it for a whole range of subjects including sports - the blur can convey motion as well as dreamy and romantic.

Hobbist or Pro if its not your look, then its not for you.

The quality of the double optic is excellent and the sharpness of the sweet spot depends on how well you and your camera adapt to manual focus. (though granted it's never going to be enough for pixel peepers or technical/ scientific work).

It takes a while to learn to use this lens well but it is worth it. You have to learn manual shooting and compose the shot in camera - without relying on being able to crop later. The images in this article really do not show how this lens performs in the hands of a skilled Lensbaby photographer, not even the slightly better double optic ones.

As for being able to do this with Photoshop: May be you can achieve something simillar - but not exactly the same. With the Lensbaby you see the effect in camera and you can change focal planes to get different looks, moving the lens around not only changes the focal plane but changes the elements and light sources captured around the edge - in PS you are limited to the pixels in the image file. With the Lensbaby its organic and at times unpredictable - and I agree it quicker than using PS, so more time out shooting vs less time in front of computer.

[brent young Posted Mar 16th 2010 10:48AM]

Oh South St, how I hated living on you...

Would be fun to play with some of these lenses.

[alkaline Posted Mar 16th 2010 12:14PM]

these lenses are horrible even at a $15 price range. the effect is dizzying and nauseating - and the pictures just look generic. i'm not sure why these have gainged any amount of popularity.

[HektikLyfe Posted Mar 16th 2010 2:01PM]

"...create all sorts of wild images that would be otherwise difficult or impossible to create within Photoshop."

I disagree. Other than the fisheye...all of the other effects can be done relatively easily using Photoshop, Picasa or even Paint.NET.

I like the effects but I wouldn't want to pay to get those substandard results when I can pick and choose which image to apply them to in post processing.

You cannot "undo" these effects.

Again, I like the effects and would enjoy making pictures look like this but I would not buy these.