FCC National Broadband Plan: some of your favorite ISPs respond

Glenn Britt, Chairman, President and CEO of Time Warner Cable:
"We applaud Chairman Genachowski and the FCC for the extraordinary effort and work that went into the development of the National Broadband Plan. We share the FCC's goal of universal broadband deployment and adoption and we look forward to participating in a robust dialogue around all aspects of the plan, which will help shape the future of broadband in this country. We know as well as anyone the positive impact that broadband access can have on individuals and communities and we want to work with the FCC and others to ensure that this valuable resource is used to its most effective potential."
Tom Tauke, executive vice president for public affairs, policy and communications, Verizon (partial):
"Verizon strongly supports the emphasis in the National Broadband Plan on the deployment of broadband facilities and adoption by all Americans. To that end, we are encouraged by the call to reform the policies that subsidize some companies' telecommunications services so the policies are focused on the technologies of the 21st century. The plan also properly focuses on identifying the barriers to swift deployment and adoption and proposing recommendations to remove or overcome those barriers. The plan correctly notes that government is a major purchaser of services and can be a catalyst for using broadband to reform the health care delivery system, improve energy conservation, preserve the environment, and promote the use of broadband technology to advance education. Chairman Genachowski; Blair Levin, the executive director of the National Broadband Taskforce; and the commission staff should be commended for comprehensively addressing the array of broadband issues and developing a coherent plan."
Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google (partial):
"Tomorrow the FCC will release a national broadband strategy. The plan will set goals for expanding broadband to unserved and under-served areas, promote greater speeds, and drive consumer demand. It will harness this communications technology to urgent national priorities, such as jobs, education, health, energy, and security. In short, the plan will lay the groundwork for investing in America's future... I support a national broadband strategy because ubiquitous broadband connectivity can catapult America into the next level of economic competitiveness, worker productivity, and educational opportunity. But as in the past, we will make this breakthrough by choice, not chance."
Brian L. Roberts, CEO and Chairman of Comcast:
"We commend the FCC for the immense effort involved in researching and writing the National Broadband Plan. The Plan appears to reflect the emerging consensus on a number of paramount broadband goals, most notably the need to achieve universal adoption and digital literacy; the need to fix and redirect outdated subsidy schemes to more efficiently deliver broadband to unserved areas and to close the affordability gap for low-income families; and the need to break down policy barriers that keep broadband from serving critical national purposes such as health care, education, and employment. With the demand for bandwidth doubling every two years, most recognize the critical need for continued private investment in faster competitive broadband networks, and the importance of maintaining a regulatory environment to promote that investment. We hope that implementation of the many recommendations contained in the Plan will help to achieve that critical balance and we look forward to playing our part in helping to make America the most connected nation on earth."






















Now that's a serious lolcal
@Drago Lets play straight face with that cat -_____-
@Drago
That cat will haunt my dreams FOREVER!
@flanders
That cat just ate a child before having that photo taken.
@Drago
Guys. Serious cat is serious.
I thought they were all against it? Weird.
I suspect if it means millions of dollars in government funds they can use, well, who'd say no?
@(Unverified) millions?
@victor In 10 years, I would be very surprised if they hadn't done this on their own (depending on the definition of affordable). I see in the next 3-5 years getting 100mbps connections for $50, which I would consider affordable since I probably pay about $40 a month for 20 up/10 down.
@victor
they are scrambling to find ways to profit from all this without consumers and goverment finding out right away i'm sure
@engadgetcomexcludeengadget I mean...we're talking about the same group of companies that were against net neutrality and government intervention on broadband policy just a couple of months ago, right?
@victor
But now its with MONEY
@GenericMessage
Money is one hell of a drug.
@victor
The plan calls for more consumers buying into the providors' products/services, and even at a lower cost this equals more profit for those companies.
@engadgetcomexcludeengadget
40? fuck me, i pay 80 for 20/20, but only get 20/10. I don't even have a 20/15 option :/
Cox Com?
@Yoda They'll follow in Comcast's footsteps. They followed them with the whole "bandwidth capping" crap. Also, if you haven't looked into it, their "Ultimate" cable modem service uses the same speeds for the same price (50 Mbps down, aka "half of what Cablevision offers", for $120/month, aka "more than what Cablevision charges"). I wish they would grow up and use the maximum speed possible under the DOCSIS 3.0 specification and charge slightly less for it than they currently do.
Does this mean Comcast will now stop messing with my internets!!
@One Love Are you high?
Sounds good. But scary...
I'm down for 100mbps/50mbps internet access Nationwide, hellz yeah.
@sodaboy581
that's...MBps in case you didn't know...our internet is usually measured by bits not bytes. So you can multiply your expectations by a factor of 8.
@questionexclamation Quite aware of that. 50mbps (megabits) is approximately 6.4MB/s (megabytes) and 100mbps is approximately 12.8MB/s... which is still damn fast.
You guys need to read this:
http://www.stopetaxes.com/
@EvilWhiteMale : you spelt "taxes" wrong. :)
@EvilWhiteMale What did Texas ever do to you...Wait, what?
@timmy2000
Yeah, good ol government.
@One Love
You spelled spelled wrong.
@rhackin Not if you're british
@EvilWhiteMale
Well, if you want the government to put its nose and money into the internet then you're going to have to pay for it in taxes.
@EvilWhiteMale
I called it.
I hate Comcast
@Mattd00d i hate telcos and ISPs
@Mattd00d
You mean Xfinity?
Xfinity, the future of . . . Comcast.
@Aurailious
They'll have 200 mbps but a 250 GB limit in 2020 :P
Does the government really need to get involved in every industry? I don't see a problem with how things are now...costs are slowly varying inversely with speed. If price controls are put on Internet service expect monopolies. Psh...of course verizon likes the idea.
@zachbeale
um. the government has always been involved in the communications industry.
and, "do they have to?" no, but they *almost always* should be involved.
@zachbeale corporations run the government more than the other way around. I'd be more worried about that.
@ror
I don't see their past actions as justification for a continued interference in the industry. It makes no sense.
@killplay
True, though only because the politicians allow them to.
@zachbeale Really? We've had the same upload speed for a decade.
Engadget is eating my comments again..... sshole, please post something so I can reply to you and make engadget the first word in my response ;)
I don't really know much on this issue but it almost feels like price fixing. It just feels weird that's all.
If anyone knows exactly what there doing that will be great... because all I've heard is very simple plans when its never simple.
How do you define affordable, I think comcast believe that $50 a month for internet is very affordable and the $99 triple play is god's gift to mankind.
@TypeEE
Not to people with under 100k a year and kids and etc.
So lets see, 10 years ago, DSL finally came available to my apt for 256 Mbps up/128 Mbps down. I paid $29/mo. Now I get 6 Mbps for that same price. that is 24x the speed for the same price. So if we can assume the same rate of speed increase for the cost we should be able to hit 144Mbps without any far reaching federal incentive.
It doesn't seem unrealistic, or overambitious. If anything it seems a tad on the conservative side.
@RandomGuy
Don't you wish you had an Edit option?
@RandomGuy
I want an option of buying 256 Kbps now for 1/24th the price though. If there was a free low speed network, companies would spring up with products that were always updating and can run remote diagnostics.
With what I do on-line anymore, I don't use that much bandwidth.
@Cyberdyne Systems
It's been a long time since he last used Kbps. Broadband FTW!
That cat looks like a tired old man...