Gods willing, the heavens will open up one day so Zeus can smite this 3-D fever gripping Hollywood and the world.
Given 2010s track record — with "Alice in Wonderland" and "How to Train Your Dragon" gobbling up millions — that's about as likely as Kate Gosselin winning "Dancing With the Stars."
Unlike its 3-D predecessors, "Clash of the Titans," opening today, is dubiously different. Director Louis Leterrier originally shot a respectably entertaining redo of the 1981 cult classic in 2-D. Then along came the invasion of James Cameron's gangly big blue people in "Avatar" and the resulting 3-D mania. Cuckoo green with envy, "Titan's" producers furiously added the effects.
In the end, who cares how obnoxiously calculated the 3-D reupholstering is? What matters is whether the enhancements of a reportedly $180-million production make the film better — and the answer is a big fat no.!
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
the reality of 3d
http://www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_14793902
Gods willing, the heavens will open up one day so Zeus can smite this 3-D fever gripping Hollywood and the world.
Given 2010s track record — with "Alice in Wonderland" and "How to Train Your Dragon" gobbling up millions — that's about as likely as Kate Gosselin winning "Dancing With the Stars."
Unlike its 3-D predecessors, "Clash of the Titans," opening today, is dubiously different. Director Louis Leterrier originally shot a respectably entertaining redo of the 1981 cult classic in 2-D. Then along came the invasion of James Cameron's gangly big blue people in "Avatar" and the resulting 3-D mania. Cuckoo green with envy, "Titan's" producers furiously added the effects.
In the end, who cares how obnoxiously calculated the 3-D reupholstering is? What matters is whether the enhancements of a reportedly $180-million production make the film better — and the answer is a big fat no.!