As you might've notice, either here on the site or likely
elsewhere on the
internet, we at Engadget have somewhat of an affinity to social networking. With a new screen sitting here saving us some screen real estate, we decided to give a number of Twitter and other pro-social apps a go for perennially staying connected to our online friends -- so long as there's a decent WiFi connection nearby. Here's the highlights from what we've toyed with, and stay tuned for
even more roundups on the horizon.
Twitterific for iPad (free; $4.99 for Pro account) - Definitely the best Twitter app on the iPad so far (pictured above). It works great in portrait and landscape, contextual links conveniently pop out and photos even get special format treatment. No option to upload photos when tweeting, but we're guessing with a lack of a camera, it didn't seem as necessary an addition -- we like to show off our screen captures and saved browsing images, but hey, that's just us. The only deterrent for power users is that you can only view one column at a time, but with lists, saved searches, and all other thread options easily accessible from the leftmost column, we didn't find it too inconvenient whatsoever. [
See in iTunes]
TweetDeck for iPad (free) - Largely the same interface as we've seen in prior iterations, and it makes the transition well here. Columns are easy to navigate and the sheer volume of information never seems cumbersome, although we find it pretty annoying that you have to switch to portrait mode to click on links, photos don't get their own formatting (relegating you instead to the site), and there doesn't seem to be a way to follow a public conversation thread -- but hey, it's free and great for multiple simultaneous feed navigation. Some people might find Twitepad ($0.99) more to their liking, but in our time with the software it was a little too crowded for our tastes, and buggy in its current state. It's definitely one to keep an eye on, though. [
See in iTunes]
Twittelator Pad ($4.99) - When it comes to adapting to the "homely" iPad aesthetic, Twittelator definitely gets it, from the postcard border to the paper clips on certain icons. Super customizable, conversation threads are easy to navigate, images show up inline... the only catch is that we're the type of user who hardly ever looks at the unfiltered follower list, the inability to change the main feed in the left column equates to a lot of wasted space. [
See in iTunes]
Sociable ($4.99) - The functionality is pretty barebones for each of the included portals, but let's face it, the ability to navigate Twitter, Facebook news feed, Flickr, Reddit, and Digg all from one account is pretty alluring, no? [
See in iTunes]
AIM (free) - Turns out the developer arm of our parent company did quite a number with bringing AIM service to the iPad, with an elegant design, a number of thematic choices, and Aol Lifestream (Twitter, Facebook, Foursquare, etc.) services "flipped" on the back of your main chat pane. [
See in iTunes]
Loopt (free) - Find nearby events and restaurants (mostly culled from Zagat, it seems), check out images and reviews of the venues, and immediately get directions via a jump to Google Maps. If nothing else, photo mode is a gorgeous look at your local nightlife that provides the same review-and-find services without the map. [
See in iTunes]
IM+ ($9.99) - Gtalk, AIM, Facebook chat, Skype chat, barebones Twitter, and more all rolled into one. It's a pretty expansive chat client, but like most of these multi-account apps, you're not getting as much functionality as you would a dedicated app for one service -- not to mention that $10 price tag is pretty hard to swallow. [
See in iTunes]
Add to Home Screen (free!) - You're not gonna get the prettiest of icons, but given the iPad's expanded screen size, sometimes the best option is via Safari itself. Simply navigate to the proper URL, click the plus sign ('+') on the top bar, and assign it the name you always wanted. No image uploading might be a deterrent for the likes of Flickr and Facebook, but if the iPhone is any indication, we imagine official apps -- free and generally superior in quality to anything else out there -- aren't too far off into the future. The iPhone apps, also, still work fine despite some graphical inferiority, so why shell out cash now for just a temporary solution?
Gimme gimme more, gimme more, gimme gimme moar...
@furquanatique
Twitter App looks better than it's website
@lollol "YEA LETS SPEND MONEY ON TWITTER APPS"
From the 8 apps in the article, 5 are free. From those 5 free, there are 2 Twitter apps.
@Herman Melville
As someone with an iPad, these are quite useful to me. I trust reviews of apps here, even if they're just brief ones. It's a good way to see what's out there.
And if people want specs on the iPad, Wikipedia's only a quick type away.
@furquanatique
So... like... where are the Minimize, Maximize, and Close buttons?
@furquanatique
Looks like it's time to borrow that wagon from Telephone/Kill Bills and get myself a truckload of these!
@staticjethro Trying to argue that the iPad is a piece of crap with your typical apple zealot is like trying to debate religion with a hardcore fundamentalist. Steve Jobs could take a shit in a shoebox and all the blind apple-flavored kool aid drinking lemmings would fork over $500 for it and an additional $300 for the iShitbox accessories.
Evolution never happened. Virgin birth is real. Steve Jobs is the messiah. Case closed.
@furquanatique
The twitter apps do look good, not sure about the pricing though...
Sorry I'm posting here, but I think it's hilarious that they blocked comments on the LeBron ipad story. First they post a non story, then Murph gets super defensive when he gets called out (he's replied to everyone!! Seriously!!!), then they block comments altogether. Ah man, good times good times.
@DirtyVegas
And really, everyone bitching about excess coverage should use the exclude tags.
Although I do wonder if ANY other company can generate such massive interest from engadget. I'll see what they do with the slate, joojoo, android tablets. My money's on 2-3 snarky articles at the most.
@DirtyVegas Yeah, Murph deleted half of my comments over there, called everyone stupid for not understanding the post and finally blocked the comments. These boys are getting touchy.
What they keep failing to realize is that THEY are the culprits in all of this. For the last few days it's been one pointless post after another about the pad. They've watched the comments get more and more heated but instead of backing off and evening everything out they just keep plowing ahead with crap. That LeBron post was really insane (although we'll never know how I really feel since my comments were deleted)
Using the exclude tag is not the answer. There is some news I'd like to hear about. NEWS. Not fluffy crap. I don't know why they can't figure out what should be posted here and what should be relegated to just the TUAW site. It seems pretty obvious to me and probably most people here.
@furquanatique Some of us actually want to see these apps. I haven't had the chance to even see on of these things in person yet so I don't mind the coverage. I do however realize that if I don't want to read all of these stories I can simply not click on them. It's really not that hard. You could always stop coming around if you're not happy with the coverage.
View: http://bit.ly/top-apps-for-ipad
no facebook love?
@New Reformation This is what every magazine does - writes for the majority of its users. Read the title of the article, if you are not interested, scroll down - takes 2-3 seconds.
And here is what you did - you clicked on the article and loaded the page (1 second), scrolled down and wrote a reply (let's say you write 60wpm, so around 15 seconds for this reply), then you click submit and the page reloads (1 second) and the you go back to the homepage (1 second).
You wasted 1 minute and 3 seconds. Also you didn't help your case, because you generated one more click on this article.
@Atkins Ooops, wasted 18 seconds, my bad.
@B3astofthe3ast
therell be another 5 seperate articles for ipad facebook apps
@Atkins
"This is what every magazine does"
No it is not. If TIME magazine had ten articles in their next issue about one new product it would be seen as a massive faux pas.
The "just scroll down" argument is not an excuse for poor judgment in posting articles. Ideally engadget should have a balanced offering of a broad scope of tech. Ten articles on one topic is a sign of irresponsible management (this does not mean they are "inept").
I am not a "hater", I am an individual who would like a bit of discernment in the articles posted. (And yes, I know I 'wasted' a ton of time typing this out.)
@New Reformation
To some extent I would agree with you (yet I still think that it is easier to scroll). If you go to the TIME magazine 3 of the 10 most read articles are about the iPad (from April 1st there are already 5 articles on the iPad). It surely means that there is interest. Given the size of Engadget compared to TIME, and the fact that Engadget is exclusively a gadget site, I think it is pretty normal to see more coverage.
If TIME doesn't satisfy all those ipad-interested readers, it won't be a big a deal, but for someone like Engadget or Gizmodo it is definitely not the same case.
@Atkins Every kind of news, small or big they are posting.
This is ridiculous.
@Exile Well, about the LeBron article, agreed. Didn't get the point there.
@New Reformation
it would only be poor judgement if Apple articles didn't consistently get the most number of commenters, and ipso facto the largest number of hits.
Engadget is a business. The numbers all point to running more Apple articles since that's obviously what people want. So why don't you take your false sense of entitlement and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, kay?
How about Seesmic Web?
Was this article really necessary? aren't these Apps things that you could easily find by just taking a quick stroll through the App store?
@Herman Melville Yes,you can find them in the Store, but there won't be a review like this.
@Herman Melville
FACT: Herman Melville can tweet over 200,000 words in a single post..
BUZZ?? WHO USES THAT THING???
@TheSunman89 - wait a moment, I'll Wave you an usage analysis...*snicker*
all very boring indeed.
I all the more appreciate the way social networking is built in the Windows Phone 7 so I don't need all these apps to send out a tweet, upload photos, or see updates.
@bySeon Agreed, its all built into the OS, it "just works"
@bySeon
Funny, if Apple did that you would call them a "closed environment" and "restricted" and "locked down", but I guess since Microsoft is doing it, it's okay. Right?
@Jack Was thinking exactly the same thing. Looked down, and saw you'd already said it.
Good work, my son!
@Jack what's closed a restricted about having the opportunity to long press on a photo and immediately share it on your favorite social networking site? With all this functionality built in, you can actually avoid the clutter of single purpose apps.
Are we going to have every Ipad app available on engadget, spectacular, genius, magical.........AWESOME!!!!!
1 screw twitter & facebook
2 I like the ipad but I am getting real sick of all this ipad stuff on so many websites
@Seemore
Yes, it's too bad some mysterious entity is forcing you to read all of it. And comment on it too, apparently.
great user interfaces, they seem to have a great look & feel.
IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD IPAD
@engadget
could we have a big mofo red button (let's say width:100%; height:100%;) with "exclude apple news" on it? just for all the countless sparkies and brighties with their learning difficulties here on engadget.
@shizzledmg
If they did that they may as well sell up the domain because there would one update a day.
@shizzledmg No you can't. You already have a scroll button - use it.
@Atkins Not to mention a bunch of posts giving links to exclude posts with Apple tags.
@shizzledmg
I tried the "exclude iPad" one but got bored with so few articles. There are a total of 8 non-iPad articles today and one of them still has something to do with Apple. Maybe I just won't come back to this site since that seems easier.
@Steve B Bye, I'd make some comment about not letting the door hit you on the way out but can't be arsed...
you people need to go wise up ffs, waaaah waaaah too much apple coverage waah Christ go get pissed off about something actually worth a damn instead of crying over a fecking tech website
So when are we going to see an updated Engadget app for the iPad? Oh and btw I am surprised at how good the AIM client is.
"twitter essentials" = spend money on "apps" thats available for free on the web.
heres the only essential you need:
www.twitter.com and its free
@lollol Seriously. I can kiiiind of understand the mentality of buying a netbook-like device for simple tasks. And supposedly everything is so integrated.. bla bla. But paying money for basic applications that do very basic things which you can do free on any computing device, regardless of OS or affiliation? Apple must be laughing all the way to the bank.
@lollol From the 3 Twitter apps mentioned in the article 2 are free.
@lollol - I'd use brizzly.com instead of twitter.com. Miles ahead in many ways (inline images/videos/maps, auto-expands shortened URLs, etc.).
I can hardly contain myself with my excitement.
Weeeee.
@RocoLumine
So what you're saying is that somebody both forced you to read AND respond to this article against your will?
Those BASTARDS.
Block Topolsky and see if he fires you.