Avatar was "OK" in 3-D. Honestly - I don't really care much for 3-D. Especially all these TV's that boast "3-D Ready!". How about a TV that can ACTUALLY display 1080 lines of vertical resolution during full-motion and not a measly 650 (LCD) and 900 (Plasma)? Hrm...?
How about instead of 3-D TV shows, we ACTUALLY get HD shows that aren't compressed to heck and back. Both Comcrap and FiOS.
How about movies with ACTUAL plots that aren't rewrites and sequels!
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Avatar was "OK" in 3-D. Honestly - I don't really care much for 3-D. Especially all these TV's that boast "3-D Ready!". How about a TV that can ACTUALLY display 1080 lines of vertical resolution during full-motion and not a measly 650 (LCD) and 900 (Plasma)? Hrm...?
How about instead of 3-D TV shows, we ACTUALLY get HD shows that aren't compressed to heck and back. Both Comcrap and FiOS.
How about movies with ACTUAL plots that aren't rewrites and sequels!
@MadMike
You are asking for too much... I mean who wants to watch a movie with an actual plot instead of the "Bayformers" movies?
@SolidSnake LOL
@plyx I'll bet 3-D sucks for folks with eye patches.