Are authors in Engadget selected by their failed attempts in irony or the ignorance on subject gives bonus points too?
Since when equipment is judged by size to determine whether it's professional or not?! "Professional" cameras are not about size and even not about resolution. It's about the quality of materials and craftsmanship, the ability to withstand heavy usage and compatibility with other equipment which is standard in the industry - like XLR inputs, TimeCode, Dolby, switchable 50/60Hz etc. etc.
And by the way mr. Ricker, HD /like in 1920 × 1080/ and 2K /which was an industry standard for years/ are not that different in terms of resolution.
While its tablet world topping pixel density, Tegra 2 silicon, and fresh to death OS certainly sound awesome, we had to get our grubby mitts on one to see if it's as good as its spec sheet would have us believe.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Are authors in Engadget selected by their failed attempts in irony or the ignorance on subject gives bonus points too?
Since when equipment is judged by size to determine whether it's professional or not?!
"Professional" cameras are not about size and even not about resolution. It's about the quality of materials and craftsmanship, the ability to withstand heavy usage and compatibility with other equipment which is standard in the industry - like XLR inputs, TimeCode, Dolby, switchable 50/60Hz etc. etc.
And by the way mr. Ricker, HD /like in 1920 × 1080/ and 2K /which was an industry standard for years/ are not that different in terms of resolution.