ASUS Eee PC T101MT review
A really good netvertible -- that's all we want. No, not just a netbook with a touchscreen, but a device with a combination of solid ergonomics and performance in clamshell mode that can swivel into a really responsive tablet. It doesn't seem like too much to ask for, right? And after being disappointed by the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t, we really thought the $499 ASUS Eee PC T101MT -- with its multitouch screen, chiclet keyboard, and standard netbook organs -- could have been it. Keyword being could. But, as you may have guessed by now from our wistful tone, there are a few reasons this particular convertible netbook didn't turn out to be all peaches and cream. If you know what's good for you, you'll be hitting that read more link to find out what was this Eee lacking in our full review.
Sadly, the T101MT's design is so last year. No -- seriously, it has the same design as the Eee PC T91 that we reviewed just about 10 months ago. We much prefer the thin and rounded design of the Seashell Eee PCs, but the squarish and chrome accented T101MT does have something professional about it. We got our hands on both the black matte and glossy white versions, though if we had to choose we'd probably go with the latter. As for build quality, the overwhelmingly plastic netbook actually feels sturdier than other ASUS netbooks we've recently reviewed, but it doesn't hold a candle to the HP Mini 5102's aluminum chassis. Thankfully, the convertible hinge isn't too wobbly, either.
Size-wise, the 1.2-inch T101MT is thick, but at 2.8-pounds it's comparable in weight to other netbooks out there. In slate mode, we wouldn't say it was cumbersome to hold it in the crook of our arm, but something about it didn't feel as comfortable as the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t. Learning from its mistakes with the T91, ASUS managed to cram three USB ports, an Ethernet, VGA, mic / headphone jacks and an SD card slot around the chassis.
The T101MT has the same matte, chiclet keyboard as the Eee PC 1005PE, which has thankfully done away with the flex that was characteristic of many previous ASUS keyboard panels. Overall, it's fairly comfortable, though the shrunken right Shift key caused us to mistakenly hit some other keys at times. On the other hand, the touchpad is significantly larger than that on the IdeaPad S10-3t, and was comfortable enough for pushing around the on-screen cursor. The multitouch implementation on the pad -- very much unlike that on the display -- is quite responsive, though two-finger scrolling was a bit jittery in some cases. ASUS continues to use a single rocker bar instead of dedicated right and left mouse buttons, so we continue to double tap on the pad to make selections whenever possible.
It's hard to decide if it's the T101MT's poor touchscreen or ASUS' terrible software choice which make the tablet experience so incredibly frustrating -- and that's really putting it mildly. While we were extremely happy to see ASUS use a matte, 1024 x 600-resolution 10.1-inch display -- rather than a glossy one like that on the IdeaPad S10-3t -- the quality didn't live up to our hopes. We attribute the extremely washed out colors to the touch layer, but the viewing angles are also quite narrow – colors were quick to fade to black when we held the tablet off axis, and we found it harder to make out text when trying to read at different angles while lying on a couch. To make the obvious iPad comparison, Apple's IPS screen is light years ahead in quality.
For a resistive panel, the touchscreen is actually quite responsive, though unsurprisingly requires a firmer press to make selections. But since we have become so accustomed to using capacitive tablets we had to get the hang of having to really give icons a firm press or use a fingernail to maneuver through menus. Multitouch gestures are just not as smooth as they should be – there's just something unnatural about having to firmly press two fingers down on the screen to scroll. The stylus, which pops out of the right side of the screen, was pretty much our best friend given the display frustrations and the lack of finger-friendly software. ASUS' included PenWrite software is supposed to optimize the finger touch experience, but we didn't really notice much of a difference when using the utility.
And this brings us to the "uh, we just don't get it" question: why in the world would ASUS ship a $499 multitouch-capable tablet with an operating system that doesn't support multitouch or even have integrated touch capabilities? That's right, the T101MT ships with Windows 7 Starter, which -- regardless of not supporting pinch-to-zoom or two-finger scrolling gestures -- doesn't include handwriting recognition or an onscreen keyboard. The company does make up for the latter concern by including SoftStylus' keyboard, but you have to manually bring it up anytime you want to input text (i.e. into the address bar), and the handwriting recognition is quite sluggish. It's for those reasons that we spent most of our time with the netbook in clamshell mode. When we did flip it into tablet mode, the stylus didn't leave our hand since the OS doesn't let you drag a finger up or down the screen to scroll or flick to move through pages. Even though ASUS does include its TouchGate software layer, it's really just enlarged shortcuts -- if we had to pick the "killer touch app," it'd be the big-buttoned calculator. Yeah, it just isn't a good situation.
To say the netvertible with Windows 7 Starter is lousy is an understatement, but how is it when you upgrade it yourself to Windows 7 Home Premium? (Note: it's a $49 upgrade from Starter to Home Premium.) Sure, it's better, but the resistive touchscreen still makes things easier with the stylus. When we surfed the web in slate mode we preferred to input URLs with the pen on the virtual keyboard, and as we mentioned before, two-finger scrolling required a firm press and was ever-so-janky. We do see the touchscreen being helpful to those that want to take notes – it was a bit slow, but our handwriting was accurately converted to text in Microsoft Word. The T101MT doesn't have an accelerometer, so you have to rotate the screen by holding down the button on the bottom bezel – we'd actually be okay with that if we didn't have to wait five seconds every time we wanted to rotate the screen.
At least there's better news when it comes to the handling the typical netbook stuff. The T101MT's 1.66GHz Intel Atom N450 processor and 1GB of memory provided adequate performance when we simultaneously wrote this review in Microsoft Word, listened to Slacker in Firefox and checked our Twitter feed in TweetDeck. While we did notice that it was sluggish to open TouchGate, we're more inclined to blame the software for that. ASUS has swapped out the flash storage that was in the T91 for a 160GB, 5400rpm hard drive. As per usual, the Intel GMA graphics set was fine for watching some YouTube and Hulu clips, but attempting anything HD resulted in severe stuttering.
The T101MT's four-cell, 35Wh battery lasted four hours and 13 minutes on our video rundown test with brightness set to 65 percent. That's actually not too bad for a netbook with a flush battery, and in real usage it lasted a bit closer to five hours. The battery oddly ejects from the bottom-front of the system so even if you do pick up an extra it wouldn't be higher capacity. Like other ASUS laptops we've recently reviewed, the T101MT comes with a cluttered desktop – we could really do without all of the ASUS utilities and eBay / Boingo deleteware. You can also head into ASUS' ExpressGate Instant-On OS before booting up Windows, but in all honesty we never really spend much time in those pre-boot environments.
What can we say? We wanted the Eee PC T101MT to be that perfect tablet / netbook mutt. But for $499, we simply cannot recommend it. Sure, you can upgrade to Windows Home Premium for a bit more cash, but at that point you're spending $550 and still getting a pretty shoddy touchscreen experience. While the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t has a better capacitive screen, we found its performance and viewing angles to be pretty unpleasant. We wish we had better news, but we're still in a place where we can't say there's a well-rounded netvertible out there. And for that, our search continues...
Look and feel

Size-wise, the 1.2-inch T101MT is thick, but at 2.8-pounds it's comparable in weight to other netbooks out there. In slate mode, we wouldn't say it was cumbersome to hold it in the crook of our arm, but something about it didn't feel as comfortable as the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t. Learning from its mistakes with the T91, ASUS managed to cram three USB ports, an Ethernet, VGA, mic / headphone jacks and an SD card slot around the chassis.
Keyboard and touchpad

Screen and touch experience

For a resistive panel, the touchscreen is actually quite responsive, though unsurprisingly requires a firmer press to make selections. But since we have become so accustomed to using capacitive tablets we had to get the hang of having to really give icons a firm press or use a fingernail to maneuver through menus. Multitouch gestures are just not as smooth as they should be – there's just something unnatural about having to firmly press two fingers down on the screen to scroll. The stylus, which pops out of the right side of the screen, was pretty much our best friend given the display frustrations and the lack of finger-friendly software. ASUS' included PenWrite software is supposed to optimize the finger touch experience, but we didn't really notice much of a difference when using the utility.
And this brings us to the "uh, we just don't get it" question: why in the world would ASUS ship a $499 multitouch-capable tablet with an operating system that doesn't support multitouch or even have integrated touch capabilities? That's right, the T101MT ships with Windows 7 Starter, which -- regardless of not supporting pinch-to-zoom or two-finger scrolling gestures -- doesn't include handwriting recognition or an onscreen keyboard. The company does make up for the latter concern by including SoftStylus' keyboard, but you have to manually bring it up anytime you want to input text (i.e. into the address bar), and the handwriting recognition is quite sluggish. It's for those reasons that we spent most of our time with the netbook in clamshell mode. When we did flip it into tablet mode, the stylus didn't leave our hand since the OS doesn't let you drag a finger up or down the screen to scroll or flick to move through pages. Even though ASUS does include its TouchGate software layer, it's really just enlarged shortcuts -- if we had to pick the "killer touch app," it'd be the big-buttoned calculator. Yeah, it just isn't a good situation.
To say the netvertible with Windows 7 Starter is lousy is an understatement, but how is it when you upgrade it yourself to Windows 7 Home Premium? (Note: it's a $49 upgrade from Starter to Home Premium.) Sure, it's better, but the resistive touchscreen still makes things easier with the stylus. When we surfed the web in slate mode we preferred to input URLs with the pen on the virtual keyboard, and as we mentioned before, two-finger scrolling required a firm press and was ever-so-janky. We do see the touchscreen being helpful to those that want to take notes – it was a bit slow, but our handwriting was accurately converted to text in Microsoft Word. The T101MT doesn't have an accelerometer, so you have to rotate the screen by holding down the button on the bottom bezel – we'd actually be okay with that if we didn't have to wait five seconds every time we wanted to rotate the screen.
Performance and battery life

The T101MT's four-cell, 35Wh battery lasted four hours and 13 minutes on our video rundown test with brightness set to 65 percent. That's actually not too bad for a netbook with a flush battery, and in real usage it lasted a bit closer to five hours. The battery oddly ejects from the bottom-front of the system so even if you do pick up an extra it wouldn't be higher capacity. Like other ASUS laptops we've recently reviewed, the T101MT comes with a cluttered desktop – we could really do without all of the ASUS utilities and eBay / Boingo deleteware. You can also head into ASUS' ExpressGate Instant-On OS before booting up Windows, but in all honesty we never really spend much time in those pre-boot environments.
Wrap-up






























Bla, bla, bla.
Resistive = fail.
@The Advanced Kind
oh gosh this crap again?
Resistive when done properly can be waaay better than Capacitive...
Stupid Apple touting Capacitive multitouch crap that no one really uses.
Analogy; Carb 4 barrel V8 can beat the crap out of that junk they put in a 2010 camaro/challenger/mustang
@AppleDrank I have yet to use a resistive screen I liked more than a capacitive for touch.
But where I really think that many PC makers fail is the screen quality. The fact that Apple uses IPS screens makes a world of a difference to me.
On the desktop, I tend to use a PC over my Mac. But I have IPS screens. On the laptop front, well, PCs rule my life now there currently and crappy screens knock a lot of laptops out of the running.
Then in the netbook world. Well, crappy screens are a given. And now everyone is on the tablet bandwagon where there is even more focus on the screen. It seems that it would be a no brainer to use a high quality screen and make your bezel look as good as possible - as that's all you got really.
@AppleDrank
please explain to me the "that no one really uses" bit.
@The Advanced Kind Having a touch-screen notebook with out stylus support for more important things like OneNote = FAIL
Seriously, I wish people would stop whining about things they clearly don't understand. I'll gladly give up a capacitive interface for OneNote compatibility. Its either resistive or active digitizer if you want to be productive, and capacitive if you want to finger paint and watch movies all day from your couch. Fat lazy bastards.
@The Advanced Kind
Asus fails are rare, but they happen.
@Luxury Guy So it seems obvious that the answer is a capacitive touch layer ith active digitizer that overrides capacitive when in use.
@The Advanced Kind
No it's not. I own a convertable mini notebook and capacitive is the way to go. You basically use the touchscreen as a replacement for the mouse or touchpad. With a stylus, you simply get pixel perfect precision and you can still tap an icon using your fingers if you want to. Personally, I don't like glossy screens with greasy fingerprints all over them and a dumbed down GUI with all elements increased in size.
About 99% of my time, I simply use the mouse to click. No dragging, gestures or other useless things I can easily do with a keyboard shortcut.
@AppleDrank
Haha, you have to be kidding. I'm just going to bite on your engine comment.
You do know that the 2010 engines are lighter, more powerful (stock), more fuel efficient, more responsive, and more reliable, right?
Yes, there's a charm to the old engines and tuning your own carburetor, but from a performance perspective the 2010 models are light years ahead of the old technology.
Sorry to take that off track :)
@The Advanced Kind
Yup Failed indeed, nothing to see here, move along.
Ipad beat this model so far. Let's see how other tablet fare against them.
@The Advanced Kind
The limitations of the iPad may be pretty terrible, but if things like this are the only competition, the iPad is still the best choice. Of course, tablets are kind of pointless anyway, the form factor just isn't any good. Lots of propping up and straining neck for not a lot of advantage over a laptop. And a netvertible? Why? What is the purpose?
@Luxury Guy
They make stylus' for capacitive screens and your whole post ONLY revolves around someone who is ONLY productive by handwriting, there are many of us who can be productive without the need to write.
@TWiz Win 7 is great, for sure it'll suit this swivel laptop perfectly. One of my concerns here are the battery issues too, hopefully it will be addressed. Viewed.. http://bit.ly/asus-3e-series-swivel
@The Advanced Kind
More importantly it has a keyboard so fuck the touchscreen altogether.
This is why you use an ACTIVE DIGITIZER. Touchscreens are great, but no passive digitizer can even compare to an active digitizer when it comes to things like hand writing or drawing.
@M3 I said the same things when the iPad came out and everybody was claiming that Windows 7 would crush it when the (insert upcoming Win 7 based tablet here) came out.
Until windows designs the UI and input for touch and not simply pen based they are going to fail over and over and over. While Steve Jobs can be an arrogant ass sometimes he was right that people don't want to use a stylus, you lose them and then your screwed.
I mean we are talking about people who can't remember an 8 character password or freak out when you try to make them choose one.
Most people will not lose their finger, unless they wrap their iPad bag around it (which I don't recommend).
Good Job MS, just ignore the most popular input method since the mouse when designing your last OS, I mean it's not like people want that or anything.
@M3 Doh, my mistake M3 clicked the wrong post.
Hey Engadget when the hell are we going to be able to remove our old posts. huh?
We were able to do that on Commodore 64's in the 80's for jebussakes.
@ttringle actually I want both, I want to have a good multitouch for audio apps and some games, browsing and such, but I really want a stylus for things like photoshop/painter. I don't see either as better- they both have very strong points
@whormongr At this point are there any apps that you would want to control using a capacitive touchscreen on a PC? Short answer: No.
Are there any apps that you would want stylus support on a PC? Short answer: Yes, painting applications, MS OneNote
@ttringle Windows 7's Touch UI is actually really nice. Especially on a capacitive screen. Have you tried it? Here's a video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBtEhQqS1dw
@ttringle Not really. When the interface used fully exploits the use of stylus in combination with touchscreen it rocks ( the videos showing the courier show how such an interface should be designed ) . The "touch interface " isn't mandatory at all , some folks -including engadget editors it seems - just want us to think all other forms of an interface are crap by default.
Also , we know already windows 7 will see updates making better use of touchscreen technology - service pack 1 maybe ? - so to simply state the OS is unsuitable this early on is a bit premature.Mind you, I think a mobile OS is better suited for tablets ( Android,windows phone 7 ) or Linux .
@rik66 Are you suggesting people to buy this, because it ''might'' ''potentially'' get a ''better'' ''touch-oriented'' OS in the ''future''? We are talking about electronics for christ sake, it's not like investing in a house. These things gets cheaper by the minute. If I'm buying some electronics, it better do what I want it to do RIGHT now and not ''potentially'' in the ''future''. Because by then, this thing is worht 10% of what I paid for it.
@Luxury Guy Actually there is ONE program: Amazon's Kindle Application for the PC. Apparently works quite well with touch. But that's about it really...
DAMMIT!
@seanGadget
Yep, the wait continues.
Nice review again, Joanna. Another lackluster device, Joanna. *frown*
I'm sorry, but the first thing I thought of when I saw this is that I really want to see a desktop/laptop level touch OS from Microsoft. If there's one thing that touchscreen portables are missing, it's on the software side of things. PC makers all have their own proprietary way of dealing with things, and none of it ever fits in with the OS aesthetics or works as well as it should.
@KupoCheer Doh! replied to the wrong post originally.
I said the same things when the iPad came out and everybody was claiming that Windows 7 would crush it when the (insert upcoming Win 7 based tablet here) came out.
Until windows designs the UI and input for touch and not simply pen based they are going to fail over and over and over. While Steve Jobs can be an arrogant ass sometimes he was right that people don't want to use a stylus, you lose them and then your screwed.
I mean we are talking about people who can't remember an 8 character password or freak out when you try to make them choose one.
Most people will not lose their finger, unless they wrap their iPad bag around it (which I don't recommend).
Good Job MS, just ignore the most popular input method since the mouse when designing your last OS, I mean it's not like people want that or anything.
@KupoCheer
The first thing I thought was, Joanna is hot. lol
@KennyB123
she's quite attractive for a tech journalist in contrast to Foley.
Eee-k
eee pc's new name change
I wish that ASUS would take more time to get things perfect rather than rush out devices with product-breaking problems.
classic case of a marketing team, price points, need to make something for certain market, engineers tell us we got these options, let's re-spec this to hit this price point....
... company organisation and upper marketing management failure.
Heh, Netvertbile...I'm liking these names
Someone left the stove on.
I can't figure what users they are targeting with this device?
A touch screen for what?
I would rather put 500$ in a very good non-touchscreen netbook.
(BTW, I would not use Windows on my netbook except for HW accelerated Flash 10.1 which we are still waiting for)
@gpmoo7 I'd rather spend the $500 on a Droid Incredible. Or for the other people here, an iPhone 4G or some other smartphone that can probably do more and be more portable than this thing.
@mr88
PS - "other people" wasn't supposed to be insulting, I just mean those who aren't stuck on Verizon or wanting Android. :-)
@mr88 I already own a Nexus One.
Since the first netbook appeared years ago, I always wanted to buy one but I still don't know what I'm gonna do with it and touchscreen is not helping.
I would definitely buy an Android/Linux tablet to give me larger-screen size WiFi-only smartphone but I won't spend 500$ on it.
Almost everyone already own a laptop so why buying a netbook?
Just because its cheap doesn't not mean it's cheaper than just not buying it.
@gpmoo7
Huh? Still waiting for? I use hardware accelerated flash on my Thinkpad Edge, works perfect.
Sure it's still in Release Candidate form but it is usable. Maybe you mean officially supported.
@Dubb
Uh he means most netbooks have a Atom chipset, and they're not supported at all. (Except for Menlow)
@gpmoo7
They're not targeting anyone in particular. They're just throwing all sorts of crap out and hoping it will be a success to somebody, anybody. They're playing it safe by sitting on a fence, although a very pointy fence. Not quite a netbook, not quite a tablet. It's not a terrible device. It just won't sell to consumers that want to buy a real tablet. The average consumer won't be able to figure out what it is and will avoid it like the plague. It's no better than a common netbook. Just more expensive.
@gpmoo7 I run IT at a medium sized architecture firm. Most of workstations are now quadro based laptops, however having a cheap netvertible would be nice to assign to each person for their concept sketches, and meeting note taking. Onenote 2010 really is something else and this device is amazingly suited for it.
While Joanna's reviews are quite good, basing much of the review on finger touch on the interface isn't of much use to me. I'd love to see a review of the hardware clean installation of Windows and some time in a real piece of productivity software - Onenote 2010.
Anything I can do to eliminate paper (and the need to scan/archive) is a big benefit.
@GeekPI
I hugely waiting for a netbook-sized proper tablet. Not a half-netbook / half-toy. If this thing does a good job as a proper tablet - meaning pen markup / drawing. Then it's perfect for me. Right now I drag a huge laptop and a wacom tablet with me for my work as a technical instructor. Real tablets are far too expensive, and I like the tablet for its portability - travel etc. I would love to see a review of this which doesn't make the mistake of comparing this to that silly iPad toy.
really not liking the eee lines chintzy black and chrome designs of late.
Ouch.
I don't understand why they used an OS that's not touch friendly on this thing. Who the Hell sat in a room with a group of developers and said "let's make it touch screen, but I don't really want them to touch the screen too much".
@Waltah
I'd like to know what non OSX based OS is touch friendly in your mind at this size? Because Android isn't as touch-friendly as people are making it out to be without some serious skinning.
And considering they used the one flavor of windows 7 that doesn't support touch, I'd say your comment is more rant than reason.
@Rem DX
So $500 sounds like a deal for a touch device that has horrible touch capabilities? Even with upgraded windows simple scrolling in the browser sucks. That's not a rant. Pinch to zoom went from 0 to a billion in one swipe. That's piss poor implimentation. I guess I'd have to have real hands on with one, but it looks like a waste.
It should be pretty clear by now that Atom processors can't cut it with full Windows.