AUO scores patent lawsuit decision over LG Display
By Richard Lawler 
posted May 3rd 2010 2:37PM
posted May 3rd 2010 2:37PM
LG Display may want to be more careful where it aims those patent lawsuits next time, after a dispute it kicked off with AUO has lead to a finding by a U.S. District court that it actually violated AUO's patents and not the other way around. Say hello to patent Nos 6,778,160, 6,689,629, 7,125,157 and 7,090,506, covering "technologies help to improve response time, improve reliability of LCDs, solve the problem of defects in the displayed images, and provide a very compact structure useful for small handheld devices, respectively." So far AUO is indicating that it will seek an injunction preventing LG from shipping its potentially infringing HDTVs, monitors, notebooks and even phones to the U.S, plus some other legal tough talk for good measure. After LG's almost inevitable appeal this could drag out for years and/or be resolved in a sudden alliance of cross licensing so while there still may be time to grab that Chocolate Touch you've been eyeing, we'd keep a casual eye on LE9500 shipping dates in case of slippage. AU Optronics Prevails in Patent Dispute With LG Display
Court Concludes LG Display Infringed all 4 of AUO's Patents
Hsinchu, Taiwan, - (May 2, 2010)
Print this page e-mail this page
AU Optronics Corp. ("AUO") (TAIEX: 2409; NYSE: AUO) is very pleased with the result that, following the finding by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ("Court") on February 16, 2010 that LG Display ("LGD") infringed all 4 of the AUO patents asserted at trial, the Court further concluded on April 30, 2010 that AUO did not infringe any of the 4 patents asserted at trial by LGD, indicating that AUO has prevailed in this important patent litigation.
This matter began in December 2006 when LGD of South Korea filed a patent infringement action against Taiwan's AUO and Chi Mei Optoelectronics. AUO filed a counter-claim against LGD thereafter. The case went to trial in June 2009. At the trial, LGD claimed over $690 million dollars of damages from AUO. After an extensive bench trial, the Court concluded that LGD infringed all 4 of AUO's patents, and that AUO did not infringe any of LGD's patents asserted at trial. AUO believes that LGD's demands were outrageous, and is elated that the Court rejected them while at the same time upholding AUO's strong patented technologies and finding infringement of them by LGD.
The 4 AUO patents that the Court found that LGD infringed include: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,778,160, 6,689,629, 7,125,157 and 7,090,506, which patented technologies help to improve response time, improve reliability of LCDs, solve the problem of defects in the displayed images, and provide a very compact structure useful for small handheld devices, respectively. The infringing LGD products cover a wide variety of applications, including LCD panels for TVs, monitors, notebooks, public information displays and mobile phones. A substantial share of products using LGD's LCD panels sold in the US for the damages period through the date of trial are infringing products.
Based on the Court's finding of infringement, AUO will seek an injunction preventing LGD from exporting to and selling in the US products found to have infringed AUO's patented technologies. The Court also concluded that LGD induced infringement of AUO's patents. Based on this ruling, AUO hopes that LGD's customers will immediately cease purchasing any unauthorized infringing products from LGD for sale or use in the US without the need for further court action.
As one of the leading companies in the design, research and development, and manufacturing of TFT-LCDs, AUO is a technology innovator with a strong emphasis on R&D for display technologies. Established in 2002 and located in Taiwan's Hsinchu Science Park, AUO Technology Center is Taiwan's largest R&D facility for optoelectronics, and currently houses more than 1,700 dedicated R&D engineers. As of the end of 2009, AUO owns nearly 6,000 patents worldwide, with over 5,500 additional patent applications pending, which places it number 1 among Taiwan's flat panel industry.
Court Concludes LG Display Infringed all 4 of AUO's Patents
Hsinchu, Taiwan, - (May 2, 2010)
Print this page e-mail this page
AU Optronics Corp. ("AUO") (TAIEX: 2409; NYSE: AUO) is very pleased with the result that, following the finding by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ("Court") on February 16, 2010 that LG Display ("LGD") infringed all 4 of the AUO patents asserted at trial, the Court further concluded on April 30, 2010 that AUO did not infringe any of the 4 patents asserted at trial by LGD, indicating that AUO has prevailed in this important patent litigation.
This matter began in December 2006 when LGD of South Korea filed a patent infringement action against Taiwan's AUO and Chi Mei Optoelectronics. AUO filed a counter-claim against LGD thereafter. The case went to trial in June 2009. At the trial, LGD claimed over $690 million dollars of damages from AUO. After an extensive bench trial, the Court concluded that LGD infringed all 4 of AUO's patents, and that AUO did not infringe any of LGD's patents asserted at trial. AUO believes that LGD's demands were outrageous, and is elated that the Court rejected them while at the same time upholding AUO's strong patented technologies and finding infringement of them by LGD.
The 4 AUO patents that the Court found that LGD infringed include: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,778,160, 6,689,629, 7,125,157 and 7,090,506, which patented technologies help to improve response time, improve reliability of LCDs, solve the problem of defects in the displayed images, and provide a very compact structure useful for small handheld devices, respectively. The infringing LGD products cover a wide variety of applications, including LCD panels for TVs, monitors, notebooks, public information displays and mobile phones. A substantial share of products using LGD's LCD panels sold in the US for the damages period through the date of trial are infringing products.
Based on the Court's finding of infringement, AUO will seek an injunction preventing LGD from exporting to and selling in the US products found to have infringed AUO's patented technologies. The Court also concluded that LGD induced infringement of AUO's patents. Based on this ruling, AUO hopes that LGD's customers will immediately cease purchasing any unauthorized infringing products from LGD for sale or use in the US without the need for further court action.
As one of the leading companies in the design, research and development, and manufacturing of TFT-LCDs, AUO is a technology innovator with a strong emphasis on R&D for display technologies. Established in 2002 and located in Taiwan's Hsinchu Science Park, AUO Technology Center is Taiwan's largest R&D facility for optoelectronics, and currently houses more than 1,700 dedicated R&D engineers. As of the end of 2009, AUO owns nearly 6,000 patents worldwide, with over 5,500 additional patent applications pending, which places it number 1 among Taiwan's flat panel industry.
Epic Fail LG
Should have kept your mouths shut
@SamTatr
Patent fights are always so amusing!
@SamTatr I find it funny when the company who started it loses *cough*
Apple
@SamTatr Patent trolling fail LG...uber fail.
Maybe before filing baseless lawsuits you should actually check whether the company you're accusing of infringing on your patents actually has patents that predate and supersede yours next time.
Pwned.
@DoctarPeppar
I agree. Also, lol!
Patent law seems to be veering in a dangerous direction the past few years. How much longer before creating almost anything "new" involves a patent violation and a lawsuit? It only helps the big money monopolies out there and squashes innovation, and lines the pockets of the patent lawyers. Just look at how the big software houses (apple, Microsoft, etc) are smashing open source software with patent lawsuits.
@bp968
Yep, completely defeats the original purpose of patents. It's hard to advance the arts and sciences when everything you do steps on someone else's obvious patent.
Boo.
AUO displays are crap.
@Peytral
Blonde emo chicks aren't :P
@Ameen
What makes you think Zoe is emo?
I logged in just to say "BURRRRRRRN" !
It really is time to implement strict time limits without extensions on patents. Would go a long way to prevent patent trolls and cut down on the litigation. Patent the idea take maybe five or ten years of exclusive profits and then it becomes public domain.
As E.T would put it.... ouch
http://www.blogdecine.com/images/et.jpg
"So far AUO is indicating that it will seek an injunction preventing LG from shipping its potentially infringing HDTVs, monitors, notebooks and even phones to the U.S"
Yeah, this won't happen. LG supplies a HUGE amount of panels for almost every major manufacturer. Just about every IPS panel is also manufactured by LG, also. This includes the 27" panel in the new iMac.
@grumbles No it probably will happen even though LG can appeal the lawsuit it's likely that some sort of injunction would be granted. However it usually involves allowing continued importation for something like 50 cents per panel, which is generally not a real concern on $1000 LCD TVs.
Still, LG has probably the worst patent trolling lawyers ever...who doesn't bother to check whether the people they're accusing of patent infringement maybe has older patents that actually invalidate yours?! I mean AUO basically didn't even realize LG was infringing on their patents until LG let them know by suing them. Seriously moronic on LG's part, and frankly kind of satisfying to see someone's greed blow up in their face like this.
Nice! ~ Anxiously awaiting a ban on LG products ~
LG deserves everything that is happening, don't forget LG fired the first salvo by taking AUO to court on patent infringements first. The only true winners in this are the lawyers and the losers are you and me the consumer as we pay for this stupidity with every LCD panel we buy.
LG sucks. Banding much?
@metric No. Not much.
So counter-sues can win after all...
Getting tired of this Patent crap...
"...after a dispute it kicked off with AUO has lead to a finding by a U.S. District court that it actually violated AUO's patents..."
The past tense of the verb "to lead" is "led," not "lead." "Lead," when pronounced /led/, is a metallic element with the periodic table symbol Pb and is known for, among other things, its density.
I hope this doesn't mean that in a few years when I have the spare cash for them, I won't be able to buy eight of HP's Dreamcolor monitors. :(