Switched On: Android's shot at TV stardom
Each week Ross Rubin contributes Switched On, a column about consumer technology.
In the short course of about 18 months, Android has gone from an upstart operating system on a single handset to one of the fastest growing mobile operating systems around to one that's increasingly being used beyond the handset on new devices like slates, smartbooks and now televisions. As fellow Engadget columnist Michael Gartenberg pointed out last week, the idea of putting the web on a TV has been with us for well over a decade with little acceptance.
But the content and role of the web has changed dramatically since Sony and Philips launched their first devices based on WebTV's platform. As I mentioned last week, the web has become home for a growing family of mainstream sites upon which we've grown increasingly dependent. It's also become an outpost for both first-run and long-tail video. And the progress of standards such as CSS has improved the display of web sites across browsers and devices. HDTV has quadrupled the resolution of televisions and enabled flicker-free display of text. While few consumers directly connect their PCs to their TVs, several of the former sport HDMI connections, and many of the latter sport VGA connections.
And as the web and TV are different animals than the ones WebTV devices sought to tame in 1996, Google TV is a different animal trainer than WebTV Networks was. Whereas WebTV sought to build a device that would democratize the web, offering access to technophobes intimidated or frustrated by PCs, Google TV is aimed at a PC-literate audience that already has broadband and perhaps even an iPhone or Android handset. It also forgoes the unappealing subscription fees that are still required by what is now MSN TV 2.
Ultimately, though, even all this won't be enough to distinguish Google TV, which will need to leverage the Android developer community in two ways. In the column Tabula Rasa, I discussed about how third-party developers would go a long way toward defining the success of the iPad, but at least iPad developers had somewhat of a model in terms of iPhone apps. Here, there are few successful precedents. Similarly, Google TV challenges developers to create compelling native applications for TV. As TiVo and Windows Media Center have shown, it is difficult to create compelling television apps beyond DVR and possibly place-shifting. Google TV has minimal interaction with the video stream, and as Steve Jobs noted this week in his D8 interview, the closed system of the set-top makes it difficult for third parties to enhance the video experience, at least on screen.
And that's the second way Android developers have an opportunity to leverage Google TV -- not as an island in the middle of a television or Blu-ray player, but as part of an family of products that includes mobile phones and a suite of services. Google TV can pump out content, ancillary information and interactivity around the television experience to companion products. The strength of this federated system can make Google TV less like Microsoft's moribund MSN TV and more like Xbox Live, a vibrant mix of content, community, that's part of an increasingly influential and powerful alternative ecosystem.
Ross Rubin is executive director of industry analysis for consumer technology at market research and analysis firm The NPD Group. Views expressed in Switched On are his own.
In the short course of about 18 months, Android has gone from an upstart operating system on a single handset to one of the fastest growing mobile operating systems around to one that's increasingly being used beyond the handset on new devices like slates, smartbooks and now televisions. As fellow Engadget columnist Michael Gartenberg pointed out last week, the idea of putting the web on a TV has been with us for well over a decade with little acceptance.
But the content and role of the web has changed dramatically since Sony and Philips launched their first devices based on WebTV's platform. As I mentioned last week, the web has become home for a growing family of mainstream sites upon which we've grown increasingly dependent. It's also become an outpost for both first-run and long-tail video. And the progress of standards such as CSS has improved the display of web sites across browsers and devices. HDTV has quadrupled the resolution of televisions and enabled flicker-free display of text. While few consumers directly connect their PCs to their TVs, several of the former sport HDMI connections, and many of the latter sport VGA connections.
And as the web and TV are different animals than the ones WebTV devices sought to tame in 1996, Google TV is a different animal trainer than WebTV Networks was. Whereas WebTV sought to build a device that would democratize the web, offering access to technophobes intimidated or frustrated by PCs, Google TV is aimed at a PC-literate audience that already has broadband and perhaps even an iPhone or Android handset. It also forgoes the unappealing subscription fees that are still required by what is now MSN TV 2.
Google TV is aimed at a PC-literate audience that already has broadband and perhaps even an iPhone or Android handset. |
Ultimately, though, even all this won't be enough to distinguish Google TV, which will need to leverage the Android developer community in two ways. In the column Tabula Rasa, I discussed about how third-party developers would go a long way toward defining the success of the iPad, but at least iPad developers had somewhat of a model in terms of iPhone apps. Here, there are few successful precedents. Similarly, Google TV challenges developers to create compelling native applications for TV. As TiVo and Windows Media Center have shown, it is difficult to create compelling television apps beyond DVR and possibly place-shifting. Google TV has minimal interaction with the video stream, and as Steve Jobs noted this week in his D8 interview, the closed system of the set-top makes it difficult for third parties to enhance the video experience, at least on screen.
And that's the second way Android developers have an opportunity to leverage Google TV -- not as an island in the middle of a television or Blu-ray player, but as part of an family of products that includes mobile phones and a suite of services. Google TV can pump out content, ancillary information and interactivity around the television experience to companion products. The strength of this federated system can make Google TV less like Microsoft's moribund MSN TV and more like Xbox Live, a vibrant mix of content, community, that's part of an increasingly influential and powerful alternative ecosystem.
Ross Rubin is executive director of industry analysis for consumer technology at market research and analysis firm The NPD Group. Views expressed in Switched On are his own.























Hmmmm... i''m sceptical of google tv.... but i probably won't get it in england anyway :(
@hammydbest but i do love me some android :)
@hammydbest
I, too, am skeptical, but hey, if Google thinks they have a good solution to the problem, let them try!
Rock our world Google!
@hammydbest
Yeah we'll see. Google are a bit hit and miss with their products but at least they try new things.
I'll wait for the other version's.
Fry?! GET OFF THE INTERNET, YOU'RE SLOWING DOWN MY ULTRA PORN!
@Professor Hubert J Farnsworth but professor isnt it time for your nap?
The only benefit I can see myself getting from this is that it will hopefully spur on my provider (Sky) to implement similar services.
The only way this would work is if they ship it with many TVs.
Not many people are willing to spend money on getting a box from Google to hook up to their already existing cable provider. That won't only seem like a waste of money but it will make our living rooms even more cluttered.
@John Lennon
Agree, as a Home Theater I will probably get Google TV along with Apple TV if it is updated.
@blindguymcsqueezy
Home Theater *fan
@John Lennon: The box is only for early adaptors. They eventually want to have Google TV embedded in television sets.
@Pyronick Yup, but you'd need to buy a new TV, unless Google is able to somehow put Google TV onto my TV that doesn't even have a WiFi connection.
I know Google wants the internet and the TV (and the PC, and the smartphone, and the GPS) to live harmoniously, but there's a reason why the average consumer doesn't consider internet apps on their television when they're looking through the aisles at Best Buy. People want some degree of separation, and I'm not thrilled about Google having another way to monitor me either.
To me, the functionality of GoogleTV ends with browsing YouTube or firing up Hulu, and I think Intel's WiDi technology is more than enough to handle such a task.
To each his own, I guess.
@Colours
Well, not all know how to connect a PC to their TV.
They want an easy UI... They want it to work upon connection, without changing resolution, activate/deactivate monitors.
Google TV, is perhaps not the best name.
It can play music, it can handle youtube videos, it can handle various of TV/Video content sites out there (including TV-channels services).
You can have games for the youngest members of the family (the other members of the family will either not be satisfied with the kind of games, or they will rather play in privacy).
Id go for a real HTPC any day, since I doubt that Google will work with the carriers here and provide more information than is already online.
Look, Google, people don't want YET ANOTHER BOX with YET ANOTHER 2 CABLES round the back of their T.V with YET ANOTHER REMOTE to keep in their already overcrowded draw.
I feel like ALL these companies are just trying to go about it completely the wrong way (essentially, a computer you plug into your T.V) and are thus doing it horribly wrong. Come on, give ME a chance - I'll do better than this!
@The Madman
Talk to the cable providers. They have been stifling innovation for years....
@The Madman
A computer to connect to the TV, is to advancedfor many users. Google TV makes it easier.
True, people dont really want more devices, but at the moment, there is no other way to go about it, since Google could not get all TV-manufactors to include a built in computer in all of their models.
A computer to connect or to build in, is pretty much the only way to go about it.
Unfortunately you cant play BluRay movies on this, that would have been a good, to get it rolling, since many out there will upgrade their system with a BD player in the future, and getting both in one device would be better... but Android has no support for HDCP.
Sign me up, Google. BTW, any 3D content on GoogleTV, for my new 3DTV? I already spread un-throttle-able broadband goodness over WiFi for free over a quarter mile range. Can I hook GoogleTV up to that?
If Sony is a partner, should anything come to the PS3? like a new browser or media player app?
i think this is the best web on tv implementation so far. if you guys saw the demo, then you will see the seamless integration of web and TV, it was beautiful. not to mention the future with apps, and who knows what else.
I can't wait to get this when it comes out. Android got something really going here and with Google stamp of approval can they really lose?
@Clark Kent Yes, just look at Okrut! Left that other social networking website -- what was it called again, "Facebook"? -- in the dust! And I remember the time that you had to go from publication to publication to place print ads. Now you just go to Google Print Ads, and it's done!
I can't wait either for Google TV. I think its the best shot from a company to bring Web on the living room!
What I'm wondering is why HTPC's aren't catching on.
Games,
Movies,
Music,
LOTS of storage,
Customizable,
Full Web,
Full OS.
@theSixFive
$$$$
@mastassmasta
Because it's over complicated for too many people and who really wants to use a keyboard while watching tv.
@theSixFive
You've got to realize that they're too complicated for most users no matter how versatile they are. The best product for most consumers is the one they can figure out how to use. Windows Media PCs are terrific for geeks, but would be a nightmare for the average consumer. I still think the biggest problem is the networks. They're causing everything to be complicated, even the simple boxes.
Look, all I want in a TV box is: time-shifting (DVR), Hulu, and Netflix. Give me a box that can do that for about $150-200, and I'm yours.
So i'll have even more adverts on my google tv than normal tv?
I've got an aspire revo connected up to my TV, one cable.. think that's simple enough for most people..
you can watch hulu on stock browser, xscope, or dolphin browsers on Android 2.2:
http://briefmobile.com/how-to-watch-hulu-on-android-2-2
HOW-TO is there ^^^
So it seems like you're all kind of missing the point. It seems like Google TV is best for encouraging content providers to render their sites in a TV friendly format - like they do now with mobile devices and PCs. I'm think that Google wants to provide a user base, publicity, and Google's expertise in showing how the web can adapt to the TV screen, which means any innovation that it spurs will probably be equally accessible for any media-center PC set-up. Seems similar to ChromeOS to me, pulling the applications/content/games etc. out of specific applications and platforms and putting them on the web where they can be accessed from all platforms. That seemed like it was clearly the idea behind the html5 Sports Illustrated Demo and the idea behind ChromeMarket.
And of course, for google, they can monetize web-based anything better than they can with platform specific applications or content.