Google, Verizon, Comcast, and more band together to form tech (and policy) advisory group
BITAG doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, as far as spoken acronyms go, but the Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group (also goes by TAG, for short) is looking to make (radio) waves. Facilitated by former FCC Chief Technologist (and University of Colorado at Boulder Adjunct Professor) Dale Hatfield, the group aims to "develop consensus on broadband network management practices and other related technical issues that can affect users' experience," which largely leads to addressing technical issues and making suggestions to policymakers. The group runs the gamut of major players in the broadband industry, including AT&T, Cisco, Comcast, DISH, EchoStar, Google, Intel, Level 3, Microsoft, Time Warner Cable, and Verizon.
Naturally, the aforementioned companies already on board are lauding the move, and for its part the NCTA is happy to see a forum for tech and engineering experts to openly discuss issues and policies. Providing the counterargument would be the folks at DSL Reports, who show reserve that this may end up being nothing more than "policy dog and pony show" to avoid stricter government regulations on network neutrality. At this point that remains to be seen, as this organization doesn't seem to have even hit infancy yet. Expect more in the coming weeks as it continues to form and attempts to organize. We submit for your perusal the press release, just after the break.
Naturally, the aforementioned companies already on board are lauding the move, and for its part the NCTA is happy to see a forum for tech and engineering experts to openly discuss issues and policies. Providing the counterargument would be the folks at DSL Reports, who show reserve that this may end up being nothing more than "policy dog and pony show" to avoid stricter government regulations on network neutrality. At this point that remains to be seen, as this organization doesn't seem to have even hit infancy yet. Expect more in the coming weeks as it continues to form and attempts to organize. We submit for your perusal the press release, just after the break.
Initial Plans for Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group Announced
Would provide advice and guidance on broadband network management practices and other technical practices that can affect users' Internet experience
WASHINGTON, June 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A group of leading broadband and high-tech companies joined Adjunct Professor Dale Hatfield of the University of Colorado at Boulder today in announcing initial plans for a voluntary Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group (BITAG or TAG). The TAG's mission is to bring together engineers and other similar technical experts to develop consensus on broadband network management practices or other related technical issues that can affect users' Internet experience, including the impact to and from applications, content and devices that utilize the Internet. Participants agreed that the TAG's mission could also include: (1) educating policymakers on such technical issues; (2) attempting to address specific technical matters in an effort to minimize related policy disputes; and (3) serving as a sounding board for new ideas and network management practices.
With Professor Hatfield, a former Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chief Technologist, as facilitator, the group will continue to develop the operational and organization structure of the TAG over the coming weeks. Specifically, the group will assess specific functions for the TAG, including: promoting outreach within the Internet technical community; identifying "best practices" by broadband providers and other entities; interpreting "safe harbor" practices; providing technical guidance to industry and to the public; and/or issuing advisory opinions on the technical issues germane to the TAG's mission that may underlie disputes among discrete parties.
"The TAG will function as a neutral, expert technical forum and promote a greater consensus around technical practices within the Internet community," said Hatfield. "The TAG would consider a number of factors in looking at technical practices, including whether a practice is used by others in the industry; whether alternative technical approaches are available; the impact of a technical practice on other entities; and whether a technical practice is aimed at specific content, applications or companies."
The participants in these initial founding efforts for the TAG expressed their desire that the group would advise on technical issues, attempt to resolve disputes over network management and related issues outside of an adversarial context, and help inform federal agencies (e.g., the FCC, Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice) in their industry oversight functions. Staff from these agencies would be encouraged to observe and provide suggestions for the TAG's area of focus.
The structure of the TAG will be formalized in the very near future. The group stated its commitment to a diverse membership composed of engineers and other similar technical experts from academia, non-profit and Internet user communities as well as participating companies representing a diverse range of industry views (e.g., broadband providers, applications developers, content developers, and equipment manufacturers).
"This joint effort by industry leaders provides an exciting opportunity to address key operational challenges facing the Internet user experience," said Leslie Daigle, Chief Internet Technical Officer of the Internet Society. "The Internet Society believes this activity is an important contribution to the ongoing global, open technical dialog and looks forward to seeing its output appropriately integrated with the work of existing Internet standards activities."
Participants in the initial efforts to formulate the TAG have included representatives from AT&T Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Comcast Corporation, DISH Network, L.L.C., EchoStar Corporation, Google Inc., Intel Corporation, Level 3 Communications, LLC, Microsoft Corporation, Time Warner Cable and Verizon. The organizations unanimously expressed their appreciation to Professor Hatfield, one of the most respected engineers in the communications policy field, for his willingness to organize and chair the effort.
Hatfield is currently Executive Director, Silicon Flatirons Center; Adjunct Professor in the Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program at the University of Colorado at Boulder; as well as an independent consultant. He has nearly four decades of experience in telecommunications policy and regulation. Prior to joining the University of Colorado at Boulder, Hatfield was the Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology at the FCC and, immediately before that, he was Chief Technologist at the Agency.
For further information about this release or participation in the TAG please contact Hillary Maxwell at (202) 572-6205 or HMaxwell@dcigroup.com.
Would provide advice and guidance on broadband network management practices and other technical practices that can affect users' Internet experience
WASHINGTON, June 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A group of leading broadband and high-tech companies joined Adjunct Professor Dale Hatfield of the University of Colorado at Boulder today in announcing initial plans for a voluntary Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group (BITAG or TAG). The TAG's mission is to bring together engineers and other similar technical experts to develop consensus on broadband network management practices or other related technical issues that can affect users' Internet experience, including the impact to and from applications, content and devices that utilize the Internet. Participants agreed that the TAG's mission could also include: (1) educating policymakers on such technical issues; (2) attempting to address specific technical matters in an effort to minimize related policy disputes; and (3) serving as a sounding board for new ideas and network management practices.
With Professor Hatfield, a former Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chief Technologist, as facilitator, the group will continue to develop the operational and organization structure of the TAG over the coming weeks. Specifically, the group will assess specific functions for the TAG, including: promoting outreach within the Internet technical community; identifying "best practices" by broadband providers and other entities; interpreting "safe harbor" practices; providing technical guidance to industry and to the public; and/or issuing advisory opinions on the technical issues germane to the TAG's mission that may underlie disputes among discrete parties.
"The TAG will function as a neutral, expert technical forum and promote a greater consensus around technical practices within the Internet community," said Hatfield. "The TAG would consider a number of factors in looking at technical practices, including whether a practice is used by others in the industry; whether alternative technical approaches are available; the impact of a technical practice on other entities; and whether a technical practice is aimed at specific content, applications or companies."
The participants in these initial founding efforts for the TAG expressed their desire that the group would advise on technical issues, attempt to resolve disputes over network management and related issues outside of an adversarial context, and help inform federal agencies (e.g., the FCC, Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice) in their industry oversight functions. Staff from these agencies would be encouraged to observe and provide suggestions for the TAG's area of focus.
The structure of the TAG will be formalized in the very near future. The group stated its commitment to a diverse membership composed of engineers and other similar technical experts from academia, non-profit and Internet user communities as well as participating companies representing a diverse range of industry views (e.g., broadband providers, applications developers, content developers, and equipment manufacturers).
"This joint effort by industry leaders provides an exciting opportunity to address key operational challenges facing the Internet user experience," said Leslie Daigle, Chief Internet Technical Officer of the Internet Society. "The Internet Society believes this activity is an important contribution to the ongoing global, open technical dialog and looks forward to seeing its output appropriately integrated with the work of existing Internet standards activities."
Participants in the initial efforts to formulate the TAG have included representatives from AT&T Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Comcast Corporation, DISH Network, L.L.C., EchoStar Corporation, Google Inc., Intel Corporation, Level 3 Communications, LLC, Microsoft Corporation, Time Warner Cable and Verizon. The organizations unanimously expressed their appreciation to Professor Hatfield, one of the most respected engineers in the communications policy field, for his willingness to organize and chair the effort.
Hatfield is currently Executive Director, Silicon Flatirons Center; Adjunct Professor in the Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program at the University of Colorado at Boulder; as well as an independent consultant. He has nearly four decades of experience in telecommunications policy and regulation. Prior to joining the University of Colorado at Boulder, Hatfield was the Chief of the Office of Engineering and Technology at the FCC and, immediately before that, he was Chief Technologist at the Agency.
For further information about this release or participation in the TAG please contact Hillary Maxwell at (202) 572-6205 or HMaxwell@dcigroup.com.
























So why is comcast in the group?
@aaronbustillos
Cuz Comcast is the shit. Like their service.
@aaronbustillos There an ISP
@N900
Haha yeah. Then again, how could they possibly have thought that was a good idea?
@aaronbustillos
Hope they regulate and forbid internet neutrality violations, like Traffic Shaping.
@who said what they did
@KevOne Surely the "/s" tag is missing from your post.
The internet isn't that hard to manage. It's just a series of tubes; just make sure it doesn't get clogged and you're good!
Lol AT&T is on it, what a joke
@aaronbustillos
Great Google is just sitting back and saying "great job guys... great job. Now as long as you give us user data we'll back which ever way you decide you want to screw over consumers."
This is my 1000th comment, guys! Feels great having been able to contribute to you all for so long... much love to Engadget and my fellow commenters... hope you guys feel the same about having me around
Relevance: here's hoping some good can come out of this
@skyblaze You have served The Empire well Commander Skyblaze. I should hope to see you continue doing so. As I have constructed a new, more powerful weapon. It allows me to destroy parts of the internet. You know that EVO vs iPhone post on Engadget recently?
Destroyed
@skyblaze
This is my 570th post, I'll appreciate you if you appreciate me.
@skyblaze
I agree with Lord Vader. You've done greatly with battling the Troll Rebels.
@skyblaze
you actually count how many comments you post?
@skyblaze Congrats, and this is relevant because if this little eyelash twinkling works and the Gov. looks the other way on Net Neutrality, then put on your throttle goggles, it's gonna be bumpy!
@commenter7 no, he knows how to read his account details..
@Dking7
lemme re-phrase, ahem...
you actually keep treack of how many comments you post?
@commenter7
track*
stupid commenting system..
nevertheless, Congratulations!!
@commenter7
After all those bloopers, congratulations was the least you could say! :)
@Lord Vader
i
@commenter7
You can keep track of how many comments by clicking on your tiny avatar at the top of the page. It'll tell you in your Member Profile page how many comments you have made on each Engadget site.
For example, after I post this, I will have posted 307 comments.
@Lord Vader
BITAG means trap in Tagalog.
It's a trap!
@commenter7 Why not, I count how many hair balls I pull out of belly button. So far I am at...um....um...Let me go back to the jar and count them.
I like TIBAG better... Reminds me of prison break :)
I've been a long time reader of engadget, always postponed registrating since i have a BSc in procrastination... what finally made me make the jump?
The need to share that "TIBAG" would have made a much better name :-)
I hope my next comments would be better/more mature :-)
Love how you guys left AT&T out of the headline.
Damnit! ... missed it by a few seconds. :-D
Tho i was thinking of a completely different kind of "TIBAG" .... i guess i play video games too much :-\
Hello new Axis of Evil
@admlshake
I was thinking the same thing as I doubt we will see anything out of this group of capitalists. They certainly won't stop traffic shaping or actually giving us the bandwidth we pay for *ahem* Comcast *ahem*...
I don't think AT&T needs to be advising anyone about anything network related...
BITAG. Say it fast... BIT-AG. I kindof like the name now.
Should name it Broadband iTag. Though probably Apple has already registered that name
Now poor people will have internet
@ashleythehottiest
Lemme fix that mistake:
"Now people will have poor Internet."
There, fixed.
http://welcometointernet.org/
These guys are banding together to influence policy, pure and simple. Another PAC to buy influence and then run commercials telling you up is down and starving is better then having something to eat.Consolidated power, in the hands of fewer people, that affects more of the population.
These companys have huge power and need to be reined in to a degree if it's not too late already. I'm not advocating monster government, just common sense. We need some enforcement for all our good. Don't let anyone convince you that capitalism needs no policing. That argument is usually given by people who would benefit from no enforcement.
I somewhat digressed from the topic. Sorry
*gets off soapbox, wanders away**
@quibbs
I agree totally. If we need police on the streets we certainly need them to regulate fat cat corporations.
@quibbs "Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them."
Ronald Reagan
@quibbs Yeah! Let's get the government involved!
Hey, maybe you can give me a list of things the government regulated that got cheaper? Must be a HUGE list the way you talk.
Cable TV, regulated for years, never cheaper.
Air Travel industry. Regulated for years, only got cheaper AFTER deregulation.
Hmm, I can't think of any.
I'll enjoy seeing YOUR list of money saving regulation!
@desmo
So what pushes back against business when they try and influence government or/and your private life to make a profit? Do you propose banning government? Then I still ask the same question. :)
@quibbs try regulating the government, special interest groups and lobbyist.. that's where the problems are!
@dataninja
I'm not proposing larger government. However, if you do your research, you'll see Cable was deregulated and actually increased the rate in which it raised it's rate in many markets. Look what happened to power plants after deregulation, Enron, rolling blackouts. Look what happened when the Glass/Stegall act was repealed under Regan. Deregulation doesn't encourage better business, just monopoly. Leaving business to do whatever it pleases because they would never do anything to hurt you is just a naive way to think. And if it does hurt you, what recourse do you have? Look, I'm not hear to answer every argument for and against. But facts are facts. I own my own business, I employee over 300 people (interstate corp). In fact it's a corporation (!). I have to deal with local,state and federal government regulations all the time, some are crazy. Sure there are issues sometimes with stupid government, but the fight for no government is just self defeating imho. I'm done, sorry to have digressed once again.
@quibbs competition is what forces innovation and lower prices, not government!
@desmo
Antitrust laws, price fixing laws, were established, as were monopoly laws to ensure there would be fair competition. So that one company couldn't conspire with others to keep rates artificially high, or take over entire markets ensuring there would be no competition to help lower prices. All brought to you by government, out of necessity because of abuses in the past by business. And to this day companies try and weaken these laws to abuse them so they can charge what they want, and take over markets, and stifle competition.
@quibbs not at all... the more government, the harder it is to expand and grow. That is what happened to the telecoms, government got in and divided areas and there was no competition. Prices sky rocketed and your service never changed in 30 years.
With wifi and wimax services coming out everywhere you can get internet cheaper than the hardwired cable or fiber optics. Go to Clear and get mobile and home for the same price as a cable line! If the old ISP want to survive, they will have to lower prices and get faster.
Let the politicians in, they will limit the wireless not to infringe on the hardwired for donations... no competition, no innovation, and higher prices.
@desmo Now is it really hard to understand that there should be fine balance between the "free market" and the goveerment regulations? I think that quibbs did explain it very well - without any (goverment) regulations, the corporations will run amok.
yo,I heard you like internets.
Hmm, an Apple Adjustable Keyboard, international edition. Interesting image.
Google+Verizon on this (or anything at this stage seems like anti Apple.
P.S.
Surely TAG is copyrighted for use by TAG Group (as in TAH Heuer, TAG McLaren, TAG Aviation etc)