Joby Gorillapod Focus and Ballhead X review
No need for magnets? Plenty of need for strength and flexibility? You're in the right place, bub. Joby's been cranking out Gorillapods for eons now, and they've essentially set the standard for what a flexible, mobile tripod should be. What started as an easy way to compose timed shots from point and shoots quickly snowballed into an entire lineup of varied products (like the Gorillatorch Flare, for instance), the latest of which involves holding cameras up to 11 pounds and pivoting them around with just a twist. Care to get our take on the Ballhead X and its Focus companion? It's all just a click away.
The Focus and Ballhead X are pretty simple devices at heart; they're meant to give DSLR owners the ability to set up a remote or timed shot just about anywhere, and the latter in particular is Joby's first real foray into what some would consider the "professional" camera accessory market. The Gorillapod Focus is truly beastly; it's mammoth in most every respect (11, but otherwise it wouldn't be suited to handle up to 11.1 (yeah, we looked it up) pounds of pure, photographic bliss. We tested the Focus ($99 MSRP) out with a D90 (1.37 pounds sans lens) and a D3S (2.73 pounds sans lens), and regardless of the position we placed it in, the tripod held rock steady. Leaning to one side, hanging upside down, you name it -- we even put a shoulder into the camera while mounted in an attempt to knock it over, and it managed to withstand minor bumps with ease. Granted, if the right wind gust hits this when planted in a precarious spot, we wouldn't count on any tripod to prevent a disaster. The good news is that the long legs wrap easily around pipes and tree limbs, making it easy to setup shots where no solid ground is available. Bending the legs takes a good deal of force, but that's intentional; you don't want gravity unwrapping your work while that $8,000 DSLR dangles hopelessly from a palm tree, now do you?
Overall, we had no real niggles with the Gorillapod Focus in terms of functionality, but the size and weight makes it impossible to lug around on leisurely strolls. There's simply no way you're hauling something this big and bulky around at Disney World, despite the fact that it could net you some seriously awesome shots within. In fact, we wouldn't recommend toting this without a backpack (or an assistant), but it's a great add to any pro photog's arsenal. So, as for the Ballhead X? Well, it does exactly what it says it will. It latches onto the bottom of your camera, and it provides near-instant pitch and yaw abilities. The only knock is that there's no quick release feature - you're stuck turning two screws each time you need to reposition the camera, and when you're shooting for speed, that's a real killer. Granted, the $69.95 price tag on this is far, far less than some of the high-end units from Manfrotto and company, so we guess we can't harp on that point too loudly. The thing's built like a tank, though, and we can't envision using it enough to ever truly wear it down.
It's safe to say that both of these products will perform well under pressure, but it's on you to decide if spending $150 on the pair (there's a discounted bundle available from Joby) is the best use of funds (though the free shipping this week direct from the company is nice). As cute as it is, the Focus still has limited utility when compared to a "real" tripod, and unless you find yourself shooting remote shots from awkward angles, you may struggle to put this to use as much as you'd like. The Ballhead X walks a similar path -- if you're a pro in need of a new tripod head, you're probably better served by one with a grip handle and a quick release mechanism. If you aren't cool with plunking that much cash down, though, this little guy will certainly do the trick (albeit with more twisting and tinkering).
The Focus and Ballhead X are pretty simple devices at heart; they're meant to give DSLR owners the ability to set up a remote or timed shot just about anywhere, and the latter in particular is Joby's first real foray into what some would consider the "professional" camera accessory market. The Gorillapod Focus is truly beastly; it's mammoth in most every respect (11, but otherwise it wouldn't be suited to handle up to 11.1 (yeah, we looked it up) pounds of pure, photographic bliss. We tested the Focus ($99 MSRP) out with a D90 (1.37 pounds sans lens) and a D3S (2.73 pounds sans lens), and regardless of the position we placed it in, the tripod held rock steady. Leaning to one side, hanging upside down, you name it -- we even put a shoulder into the camera while mounted in an attempt to knock it over, and it managed to withstand minor bumps with ease. Granted, if the right wind gust hits this when planted in a precarious spot, we wouldn't count on any tripod to prevent a disaster. The good news is that the long legs wrap easily around pipes and tree limbs, making it easy to setup shots where no solid ground is available. Bending the legs takes a good deal of force, but that's intentional; you don't want gravity unwrapping your work while that $8,000 DSLR dangles hopelessly from a palm tree, now do you?

Overall, we had no real niggles with the Gorillapod Focus in terms of functionality, but the size and weight makes it impossible to lug around on leisurely strolls. There's simply no way you're hauling something this big and bulky around at Disney World, despite the fact that it could net you some seriously awesome shots within. In fact, we wouldn't recommend toting this without a backpack (or an assistant), but it's a great add to any pro photog's arsenal. So, as for the Ballhead X? Well, it does exactly what it says it will. It latches onto the bottom of your camera, and it provides near-instant pitch and yaw abilities. The only knock is that there's no quick release feature - you're stuck turning two screws each time you need to reposition the camera, and when you're shooting for speed, that's a real killer. Granted, the $69.95 price tag on this is far, far less than some of the high-end units from Manfrotto and company, so we guess we can't harp on that point too loudly. The thing's built like a tank, though, and we can't envision using it enough to ever truly wear it down.

It's safe to say that both of these products will perform well under pressure, but it's on you to decide if spending $150 on the pair (there's a discounted bundle available from Joby) is the best use of funds (though the free shipping this week direct from the company is nice). As cute as it is, the Focus still has limited utility when compared to a "real" tripod, and unless you find yourself shooting remote shots from awkward angles, you may struggle to put this to use as much as you'd like. The Ballhead X walks a similar path -- if you're a pro in need of a new tripod head, you're probably better served by one with a grip handle and a quick release mechanism. If you aren't cool with plunking that much cash down, though, this little guy will certainly do the trick (albeit with more twisting and tinkering).




























I havethe iPhone version and they are amazing for photography!
@maribo
so this is how girls get those crazy angles on myspace.
@maribo
I would have to agree that they are amazing for photography, but you just used iphone and amazing for photgraphy in the same sentence. Nothing against the iphone, but is THAT what you really use for photography?
@SlaterGS
haha ya c ur point. And know it isn't what I use there wa slot of different connections for the gorilla pod and the iPhone was one of them, I use the iPhone to take videos of my tv for YouTube as the iPhone records screens very well.
@maribo - Ok.... normally I really don't care too much about internet grammar and such, but this REALLY bugs me - No is spelled N O. Know: to perceive directly : have direct cognition of (2) : to have understanding of
How exactly do you mix those two up?? I mean, it takes more effort to type out know than no, why would you go through the extra trouble just to mess it up?
/rant
@Brokinarrow
Ok how's this.
Yes I know I made a couple of mistakes when I read it back after I had posted the comment, the other thing that's a draw back is that I have never been good at English grammer, plus I was in a rush.
@maribo
"I have never been good at English grammer"
So get good! LEARN! Some people's complacency towards grammar and spelling infuriates me to no end! If you appreciate your language make sure you speak it and write it well.
And it's spelled grammAr, no "E"
/rant
@tikigawd
haha so u managed to find one thing wrong big deal. Nobodys perfect mate, and to be honest I really don't care.
Unfortunate name.... joby is Scottish slang for shit....
Uhm, the Ballhead X does have a quick release
http://joby.com/gorillapod/ballheadx/features
@TheLostSwede
If you look at the context you'll see they mean quick release for the tension not the camera plate. On a Bogen ball head there is 1 lever that needs about a 1/4 turn to completely release the head allowing full range of movement.
@Generic42
No, there is a quick release plate. In fact, it's far better than Bogen's system. Look at the knob on the Ballhead X at the top. http://joby.com/gorillapod/ballheadx/features -oh that was already pasted. It shows a quick release plate which uses the Arca-Swiss tongue and groove system, which not only works well but is standard among many professional photographic brands.
The ball head is a professional ball head rated for 5kg. Many pro's need more for certain setups, but many pro's also don't need that much for every rig.
I'm not a pro, but I do a ton of photo and video work. I need to pick up my Ballhead X, but I've spent time with them in stores. My gorillapod Focus has been hugely helpful. It works at low angles, can hold so many different things (like big microphones) and I can mount it in a tree. Mounting my camera to a tree branch was a great shot in a video, that was easy since I don't have the money or resources for a jib and crane.
Please, Engadget, revisit the review. These are very professional tools. They're affordable, and awesome! :)
@Generic42 You're right, the article uses "quick release" to mean a different thing. The problem is that in the common photographic vernacular, quick release refers to releasing the camera from the tripod.
@Generic42
I though you meant Joby's site, but yes, I do now see what you mean. Engadget wants a faster way to reposition the ball head. However, I don't think there's many heads that have a quick release for tension because you could very easily do some serious damage. Still, it'd be a nice feature.
Oh, that note, I think the quick release PLATE does deserve a mention. Arca-swiss style plates are incredibly useful, and it means you can buy a whole bunch of other accessories, or use many replacement plates if you lost the Joby one while working.
Magnets how do they work?????
@DefPoet
For the physics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetism
For the Joby Magnetic GorillaPod:
http://joby.com/gorillapod/magnetic/
@grandmainger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtube_gdata&v=_-agl0pOQfs
You must know your internet meme
@DefPoet frakking miracles
I'm still too afraid to trust my DSLR to one of those.
@Baconbits I'm with you.
@Baconbits
The smaller gorillapods do seem a little wobbly, I agree. However, the focus is something on it's own. The aluminum makes the thing REALLY stiff, and it grips very well.
I'm always careful when I let my camera go, to be able to catch it, and I use the neck strap while securing it, if possible. However, I left my camera in a tree from an hour one time, and it worked very well! A great unique angle for a project. :)
You're pricing is a little off:
Manfrotto 496RC2 ~$85 at your favorite retailers, holds upto 13lbs
$140 can also get you a Manfrotto Magic Arm setup - although it can't stay standing by itself, it can clamp on to just about everything in sight with an insane amount of grip, which (depending on your intended use) can make it more useful than the Joby.
It's definitely worth checking out..
@peshgel
I was thinking the same thing, the Super Clamp, and Magic Arm are MUCH more secure, I've personally used one to attach to the support strut of an airplane to shoot pictures in flight. I certainly wouldn't trust this to do the same.
@PPGMD
Exactly. No matter how hard it may be to pull the legs apart on the Joby after its attached, i wouldn't trust it to hang off the handlebars of my bike with $5k of equipment attached.. I dont think twice about doing the same with the Magic Arm/ Super Clamp combo. Im not trying to discount the quality of the Jobo (as I havent tried this new one), but the Manfrotto setup sets a really high bar that will be tough to beat.. and all for around the same price.
@peshgel aw c'mon. They are two totally different products for two totally different tasks. It's not designed to be hung off airplanes or bikes. The joby is useless for those, while a clamp is useless if you have a thick branch. Or no branch - just uneven ground like on a rocky beach. Or in cramped areas. It's less bulky and has fewer bits and pieces too.
Saying the magic arm is better than the gorillapod is like saying .... a clamp with an arm is better than a tripod. They are two different things meant for use in different situations. They're both good at what they're designed to do. They complement each other, not replace each other.
@eug
I agree that they are different products for different purpose- that's why I qualified my original statement with "depending on your intended use". I may be going out on a limb here, but I assume that the person that would be looking at the Joby because of their large cameras and lenses already has a decent tripod, so the Joby would be meant to attach the camera to the oddball object.. similar to what the Manfrotto setup would accomplish. And although the Joby does work as a tripod, its pretty darn short so its utility *may* be limited (though your point of uneven ground is very valid, and the Super Arm can do nothing to fix that problem).
To each their own, I just wanted to make the recommendation that people looking at the new Joby should also check out the Magic Arm/ Super Clamp.
I had the slr zoom, was great till the cups holding the balls started to break.
So not is just a floppy tripod that cant hold a shape.
@redhotlama
I've had the exact same problem, two cups on two legs have cracked, strangely it's the fourth ball up on both of them. Tempted to see what sort of warranty/guarantee I have with it as now I have a decent tripod it doesn't get much use.
still looks like a sex toy
"-- we even put a shoulder into the camera while mounted in an attempt to knock it over, and it managed to withstand minor bumps with ease"
-hope you still have that receipt for the shoulder, may want to get another one if you couldn't move the camera.
the ballhead (other one- ballhead for focus or zoom) is a good idea and it has a quick release and bubble level.
i have a slr-zoom and ballhead and it is a champ to keep in the bag. camera used with it is a mark II and 24-105mm with it and 0 problems
"if you're a pro in need of a new tripod head, you're probably better served by one with a grip handle and a quick release mechanism."?
Right. The writer clearly hasn't seen many actual pro ballheads. They tend to be the same basic design as this joby, with the addition of a tension knob (of course they're also much beefier and better machined.) You generally won't find a pistol grip on any of them. And as others have pointed out, the joby does have a QR plate (and an Arca-swiss system one, no less.)
FWIW - I've carried this around on my backpack @ Disney World. It was paired w/ a Manfrotto 486RC2, and was used with my 7D and 17-55. For someone looking for a little stability and alot of portability, I would not hesitate recommending this.