Australia to pay Telstra A$11 billion for entire copper network
The Australian government just found the infrastructure for its A$43 billion national broadband project and eliminated its largest competitor in one fell swoop -- pending shareholder and regulator approval, Telstra will receive A$11 billion of that money in exchange for its entire landline network. Telstra will decommission its monopoly of copper cables to make room for the government's fiber and migrate its customers to the resulting 100Mbps National Broadband Network (NBN) as those light-bearing threads roll out. While Telstra might become a smaller player in the internet and cable business without a land network of its own, it may get even larger in the wireless space -- the company says it's received "written confirmation from the Prime Minister" that it can bid on a chunk of precious LTE spectrum should the deal go through. Press release after the break.
Telstra signs Financial Heads of Agreement on NBN
Media Release 20 June 2010
Telstra today signed a non-binding Financial Heads of Agreement with NBN Co to participate in the rollout of the National Broadband Network (NBN).
The transaction, if completed, would deliver to Telstra a post-tax net present value of approximately $11 billion. This includes payment for the decommissioning of Telstra's copper network and cable broadband service, use of Telstra's infrastructure, and the value to Telstra of avoiding costs, including certain Universal Service Obligation (USO) costs. Payments would be made progressively to Telstra.
The transaction would see Telstra progressively migrate its voice and broadband traffic from its copper and cable networks to NBN Co's network as it is rolled out. Telstra will continue to use its cable network to meet its pay TV contract with FOXTEL.
Telstra Chairman Catherine Livingstone said the milestone was encouraging after a year of complex negotiations.
"The Heads of Agreement is consistent with the Government's high-speed broadband vision and desired industry structure. This agreement reflects a commitment by all parties to reaching a mutually beneficial outcome for Telstra investors, customers, employees and the industry," Ms Livingstone said.
Telstra Chief Executive Officer David Thodey said: "We will continue to work with the Government and NBN Co on the detail required to implement the principles agreed today. While today's agreement is an important step, a very significant amount of work must still be done on many complex issues."
These issues are as diverse as migration processes, taxation, the future of legacy regulations applying to Telstra and the consequences of any major changes to the NBN rollout schedule.
While the Government is not a party to the Heads of Agreement, Telstra has received written confirmation from the Prime Minister that Telstra would be able to bid for Long Term Evolution (LTE) wireless spectrum should the transaction be completed and that sufficient regulatory certainty will be provided on a range of matters for NBN Co and Telstra to enable the transaction to proceed.
In addition to requiring shareholder approval, the Heads of Agreement has a range of conditions, including the passage of necessary enabling legislation and ACCC approval. Accordingly, there can be no guarantee at this time that the transaction will progress to completion.
The Heads of Agreement provides the framework for definitive agreements to be negotiated over the coming months. Should those agreements be finalised Telstra expects they would be put to shareholders in the first half of calendar 2011. Shareholders and investors would receive comprehensive detail in relation to the definitive agreements and an independent expert's report on the transaction well before the shareholder vote.























Give'em A$11 billion, that's quite a way to break a monopoly
@JeremyBenthem ... there paying the company to shut down the network so yes yes it is
Ahh yes, now Aussies can feel better about their government passing Chinese style internet censorship laws, cause they own the network!
@JeremyBenthem
The government is loving it because they paid 11Bn for Telstra's infrastructure which they sold for 14Bn. Telstra is loving it because they get a boatload of money to divest a network they keep complaining has a capped wholesale value whilst costs of maintaining regional links are ever growing. Plus they get a boatload of money to buy up wireless spectrum.
@JeremyBenthem
And the government actually wants to decommission the entire copper network? Isn't that a huge waste of infrastructure? Isn't there a way to combine services with the planned fiber for a even faster network?
@SeeKo
they may be using cable down to at customer level, but I'm the company already has plenty of fiber optic lines at a higher level
@Ray W Pay 11B for something that is dwindling in value and loving it? Seems a bit odd, regardless of the sale price. That's like Apple selling you a computer for 1,400 AUD and then years later loving to buy it back for 1,100 AUD...it doesn't make sense.
And then give what I imagine would be a sweetheart deal on LTE. Ouch for govt, though you are right about Telstra loving it.
Good news for Australia, hopefully.
In other news, Australia installs giant supercomputer filtering system...
@SiXiam
Yeah, I'm surprised Engadget didn't make a joke about Australia's information censoring.
@r34p3r : why would card-carrying Apple worshipers do that? They love top-down control of what you can and can't do online.
@r34p3r Because it's unrelated, and on the whole this fibre network is a Very Good Thing. And there really is no reasonable argument against the government owning crucial national infrastructure.
@SiXiam Wouldn't be surprised if that "Supercomputer" would end up being a P4 box that the prime minister can kick every time someone tries to bypass the filter.
@Kirril I agree with you on both counts (the NBN being a good thing, and there being nothing wrong with the govt owning the infrastructure)... For the most part. My lack of full endorsement is because I KNOW they will find a way to screw it up.
If only the national broadband plan called for something like this...
@10nisman94
Thats that I thought, just have the US Government buy AT&T's copper and fiber networks, invest a couple of extra billions on upgrades to enable every household in America have FTTx, and have a way to fund the system. Low income citizens can have subsidized service while wealthier people can pay for their connection. Also, there can be a couple of speeds that you can upgrade to. This will make the now monopolies offer voice and video as a service, therefore making them compete against each other in a level playing field. I mean its not like the US gov did not already spend billions of tax dollars to create the infrastructure, so why not have it benefit tax payers instead of big monopolies.
@rstoplabe14 Since when have the wealthy paid for something to subsidize it for those with low incomes? Sheesh, it's taking forever to get equitable healthcare much less an arguable luxury live fast wire to your house.
@Sp4rky for a while now, it is called taxes
@Sp4rky
Really? Do you live in the US? All of those social welfare programs, you know the ones that the Far Right are so afraid of? Either way, with all of the subsidies that we give the telecoms (and the oil industry), we practically own the infrastructure. We should do it the same way school lunches work. If you qualify, you can get free or reduced lunch, if not you must pay full price, and if you don't qualify for free or reduced lunch and still don't have the money for lunch ( or forgot it ) we'll give you a PB&J sandwich w/ Milk. and if you want soda instead of milk ( thats before all the moms went crazy) you can buy it but pay full price for the upgrade. This model works great for a fiber to every household program.
Been talking about this for so long its not funny.
And we still have to pay $40 a month for a 10gb download (and upload) quota.
Telstras evil, they prey on the elderly and people who think Telstra is "true blue aussie", so anything that gives them less control is good.
@Adamgs
Amen brother, with those speeds the quota will be reached in no time at all.
The Melbourne fibre trial areas have quotas limited to 30Gb.
Its not enough if we are to go ahead with streaming movies and downloading games and household video calling.
@Bort Simpson yea im tired of my ausie friend not being able to play games with me, or watch a movie with me/webcam just becuase shes only allowed 5 gigs of internet per month, and she goes over it every month. kinda stupid if you ask me. also australias considered one of the worlds internet black wholes, right up there with china and places.
@Adamgs Get your priorities right, Australia. Fix your download caps first.
@Adamgs
We have a 12gb download and 7gb upload quota for $70 a month. We were using dial-up unitl 3 months ago, now were on satellite internet which has an inherent lag. We don't have options for cable/broadband/dsl, just dial-up and satellite.
@Adamgs Ive got a 90 Gig download quota with Optus. and for 50 bucks a month you can get 180 gig with TPG so stop complaining and get off your arse and look for a better plan.
@Adamgs
I pay $80 a month including line rental and get 130gb dl, unmetered ul with exetel. AFAIK they are also participating in some of the fibre rollouts (tasmania).
@Adamgs seriously you need to get out more, my parents are on TPG and they pay $49 for 180GB cap on ADSL 2+. I pay $69 on TPG and get a 200GB cap.
@Adamgs
while i don't know anything about the Australia internet game, what if when they get the network up and running they can eliminate the caps? thats probably the best that can happen
@Adamgs
You do realise ADSL2+ isnt available in all areas?
We cant all live in Sydney....some of us have to survive on ADSL1 which is going UP in price while MOST ISPs now count uploads (they never used to)
@Adamgs ADSL1 is NOT going up in price. At least not if you pick the right ISP.
TPG for example recently lowered the price of their ADSL1 plans. I pay 59.95 per month. The plan I am on would now cost 49.95 per month. Other plans from TPG have dropped in price as well (i.e. the amount you would pay for a given quota amount has fallen)
Other ISPs like Internode are also introducing reasonably priced plans (plans that are available to anyone on any Telstra DSL port I might add)
Usually, the people complaining about the increasing costs of ADSL just need to find a better ISP instead of the crappy one they are on now (usually Tel$ra or Optarse). If said person is on contract, they need to either leave and pay the early termination fee or they need to learn a lesson and switch to someone else at the end of the contract.
In any case, no matter what Telstra ADSL hardware you are connected to, for ANY standard Telstra ADSL1 plan (i.e. not one-off deals or special bundle deals where you have everything including home phone, mobiles, ADSL, Foxtel etc all on the one plan and bill) there will be alternatives out there that are cheaper.
@Adamgs
Wouldn't ADSL1 be nice... The best we can get is NextG, around 5km from the town centre by road.
And no one see's anything wrong with a government-owned and operated internet? Seriously?
11 Billion dollars of tax payer's money just to replace one monopoly with an even worse one. Now *that's* progress.
@Cash9007
and that 11 billion will probably come from people who won't even use the service.
@Spiky haired boy
At least with a democratic government the public has some say so over the way things run. When corporations have control only shareholders have any sway, leaving much more potential for screwing over the general public.
@plyx but now the democratically elected corporate owner can pass a bill saying you have to pay for it whether you like it or not. Now the democratically elected corporation can filter it because the majority now wants to throttle P2P connections since it is slowing down their speed.
@plyx we live in America,the company's rule anyways, and this crap will never hapen here
I pledge allegence, to the stocks, of the corperate states of america.
Meh, better than socialism
@plyx I think you're seriously underestimating the situation. When the government has control of something, there's very little the public can do, because a single issue that does not affect all of the population is unlikely to bring down a government. But with a corporation, there's a much more direct relationship to consumer response, and if enough people don't like the product there is a chance for competition to develop. Not so with any government monopoly.
@Cash9007
The government owns the infrastructure, not a SINGLE company that has both the infrastructure and the delivery. Think about it. Do you remember the halcyon days of AT&T before the split?
@plyx
You want a say in a company, don't buy their products. See how fast they are to change their policies.
Now try that with the government. Don't want social security? Don't pay for it....oh wait, you don't have a choice.
@Mr Pips I don't want to pay for Cable Set Top Boxes, so I cancelled their service. I wanted "Clear QAM" "Expanded Basic" Service. 2 years later, they haven't budged. Unless 40%+ of their customers cancel in protest, change ain't coming. At that point, they sell out and the new overlords enact their new policies.
Nobody said you need to accept your Social Security Income. Refuse it in protest!
@Cash9007
No I don't see whats wrong it...but thats cuz I'm not some paranoid nut job....
@Cash9007 at the moment a small network provider can't easily bypass the telstra internet pay-wall to supply services to end users. What the government is proposing is to remove the telstra pay-wall and allow anyone to offer services on the network. In the long run the government wants to let the resulting company go public but first they must have the rules in place that defines what the final entity can do, to do that they must buy Telstra out (cant make telstra play nice legally). The upside though is it is cheaper to buy testra's copper than build a new network.
@Mr Pips sorry doesnt work, if your demands dont give them high returns they tell you to go jump. Also pure capitalism always creates a wealth vacuum as all the money is sucked out of the general population so the corporations can buy each other out and create monopolies that can be used to over charge the plebs, thus the cycle continues until they own all the money and you are wondering why the hell the service is crap and it costs so much.
@Mr Pips
Uhh, don't want to pay for SS? Move to another country. Just as you can switch ISPs so can you emigrate. You act as if you are being forced to stay in the U.S. when I'm sure someone outside the U.S. would be happy to take your place.
@Meeso Yea, government is so different than that, one person always makes a difference.... Oh wait, democracy by definition requires 50+%
@Cash9007
It's an investment. Government believe they'll start getting money back in 7 years and then a profit in 14 years, which from there they'll privatise it again. Telstra are hopeless, a monopoly, and would never provide better technologies.
Broadband network are like our roads, rail and ports. Shame they're going to privatise it after 14 years.
Like was said on the Engadget show: Anyone putting copper in the ground now is, quite frankly, an idiot.
Buying copper is, in my opinion, just as bad. Fibre isn't the future - it's the present.
Sent from my Fibre connection.
@Coptician
75.00 Terabytes/sec = Light through glass fiber optic cables.
@SiXiam 10 kW - power through copper cables?
@Coptician They didn't buy it for the copper, they bought it for the infrastructure that houses the copper, they now don't have to dig extra pits.