We got up pretty close to the
iPhone 4's retina display in
our review, but we can't say we got quite as close as PhD candidates Ryan White and Bryan Gauntt of Penn State University, who have kindly provided us with some images of the screen under a microscope (along with an iPhone 3G for comparison). According to their measurements, the iPhone 3G's pixels measure 13 x 40 microns, while the iPhone 4's measure 6.5 x 20 microns, which adds up to
exactly four times as many pixels. As impressive as sounds that sounds, however, it's the pictures that really tell the story -- hit up the gallery below to check them out.
JonathanPaulIve:
"I messed up big time with the iPhone 4 antenna design, I only get 2 bars when I touch it but full when I leave my hands of it."
LOLz
enough already?
INSANE. Wish the Evo 4G employed a similar screen. Oh well, both phones are good.
I bet if you take everyone in line at the apple store. Ask them if they have ever touched a breast. Those people that have, step out of line. The ones left add up to about 600,000. Guaranteed.
@Arealjerk
I have touched a breast...... Of chicken
@Arealjerk What is this "breast" you speak of?
Sooo the iPhone 4 has beautiful screen density thus displaying beautiful yellow spots and tries hard to make phone calls... that's a hell of a device XD
Too bad this beast of a screen is getting yellow spots on most manufactured ones arriving to people...very dissapointing for such a nice display.
I don't see the point of doing this over and over, it's like comparing the pixels on a 1080p 22" monitor to a 1080p 47" TV.
How many times are we going to hear how great the iPhone 4 screen is? We get the point Engadget. Personally, I cant tell the difference anywhen when looking at the screen from arms length away. When Apple makes a phone that gives a happy ending, then I'll get excited.
Ok, now compare the iPhone 4 vs something nice with a WVGA screen, like a HTC Desire.