Entelligence: App stores are not enough
Entelligence is a column by technology strategist and author Michael Gartenberg, a man whose desire for a delicious cup of coffee and a quality New York bagel is dwarfed only by his passion for tech. In these articles, he'll explore where our industry is and where it's going -- on both micro and macro levels -- with the unique wit and insight only he can provide.
A little over two years ago, Apple changed the face of mobile computing when it launched the App Store and broke down the barriers between app developers and end users. There was no longer a need for users to go to a third-party web site, hand over a credit card, download an app to their computer, and sync it to their device. The App Store's integration with iTunes made it easy for the consumer to purchase apps, and purchase apps they did. But while Apple now commands a major lead in the sheer number of apps for the iOS platform, it's far from game over in the mobile market, and other competitors can catch up. But it's going to take more than just an app store for other platforms to level the playing field -- that's just the table stakes now. Here's what mobile platform providers need to compete effectively.
First, the devices must stand on their own. Before Apple introduced the iPhone OS SDK, the developer program and the App Store, the company sold more than a million iPhones and iPod touches. That is, it had captured a large enough market for developers to notice before third-party apps were brought into the equation. Handset vendors and platform providers must have devices that are compelling to consumers out of the box, with features and form factors that attract buyers independently. Seeding a market with quality devices is one way to capture the attention of developers who will all want to be part of a platform with room to grow.
Second, developers want leverage -- they want the maximum possible utility from their hard work. In the case of iOS, that means apps can run on the iPhone, iPod touch and iPad. In the case of Windows Phone 7, the combination of Silverlight and XNA can enable apps to run across the phone, Xbox and PC platforms. Google has talked about Android running on everything from phones to tablets to TVs, all sharing a common Android app marketplace. Mobile will be increasingly become only a single aspect of the consumer's digital ecosystem, and platform providers must show developers the roadmap for connected screens beyond phones to get their attention.
Platform providers must show developers the roadmap for connected screens beyond phones to get their attention. |
Finally, show developers the money. It's an app monetization game, and devs want to make money. To do that, platform providers must create alternate business models for developers to tap into -- developers who feel they can monetize apps will create more apps, and more apps lead to more platform adoption, which ultimately leads to more devices sold. Both Google and Apple are betting heavily on ad platforms to help developers make money, but alternative monetization models, co-marketing efforts and discoverability resources are all critical to jump starting app platform development.
There's a battle going on for mobile platform supremacy, and right now there are simply too many platforms to succeed long term. And the old rules simply don't apply any more, as the criteria for mobile platform success in mobile reaches beyond simply having a well-stocked app store. It will take much more than an app store to drive success -- the key factor between success and irrelevance will increasingly be the cohesive application story each platform provider can tell. Look for the platforms with the out of-the-box and core experiences that also allow developers to best leverage and monetize their apps to make the cut long term. The wise vendors will figure this out sooner, while the others will begin a long slide into irrelevance.
Michael Gartenberg is a partner at Altimeter Group. His weblog can be found at gartenblog.net. Contact him at gartenberg AT gmail DOT com. Views expressed here are his own.






















A gadget blog that has posts about iphone's all way is not enough.
@graysquirrel
A gadget blog where all the commenters do is bash the iPhone and anything Apple is not enough, http://amirite.com ?
@antriver No, not really. =/
@N900
yes, he is. really.
@pleaseinsertacoin
technically he is, but thats what TUAW is for
@pleaseinsertacoin
nuh uh, times infinity, for really real.
triple stamp, no erasies, touch blue make it true.
@pleaseinsertacoin Is he, really? Because I don't bash anything Apple or the iPhone, and I know a significant amount of people on this blog that are the same. =/
@antriver A device like the iPhone is enough.
@woshishui Well, when you put it that way..
"no he's not" "yes he is" "no he's not" "yes he is" "no he's not" "yes he is"
this would happen in a michael gartengerg article
@Processing oh yeh, and I forgot about newbalance spam. Silly me.
@Processing It's true, he rarely makes a good point (i.e. something non-obvious to the average Engadget user) and believes "fair and balance reporting" means taking one side and then the other. 10 to 1 this guy has worked in marketing (if not he should).
@DBG er, I was talkin about the random banter between comments in this thread, but yeah I see what you mean.
@DBG and also, when you put it that way, I'm not saying there's not a lot of good apps in the app store, but there needs to be some regulation.
@N900 Oops, comment fail.
@N900
Needs to be some regulation? Are you kidding? Developers submit around 20k apps per week. If Apple didn't regulate these submissions there would be 500k apps by now.
@jellotime91 No no I wasn't talking about the App Store app store. My comments ended up in the wrong place.
@graysquirrel
exclude/apple.
I swear, I'm going to make an account called "exclude apple" and tell people to just look at the name.
Seriously, if you're so pissed at the apple posts, use the exclude/apple addition to the URL or just relax a little
@graysquirrel
+1. There's never an article about another phone without some sort of comparison to Enfanboy's favourite Cupertino non-phone. Why shouldn't this happen every time there's an iPhone article then?
@geekthree
To be honest exclude Apple is not what he is looking for, and not me either. But there simply is a bit much apple on this site, and the balance tips over.
I want to read when apple launch a new phone.
I dont mind a review, if its not biased.
What we want is a non biased version of Engadget. Where sles numbers of Apple units are not presented more often than by other brands.
Where not every phone is compared to iPhone, and the iPhone considered the best smartphone out there. I want fair reviews, and if they are going to compare a device to iPhone, in unserfriendlyness, then compare to satio or Pixon 12MP for the camera, xonim for build quality, and so on. Just dont compare to iPhone, and make iPhone look superior, and also, all that mentioning of Apple and iPhone, has some positive effect on their sales. Its not only Engadget that does this, so they are not the only ones to blame. But for beeing the worlds biggest tech-blog, it is a bit strange, how much Apple news they can fit compared to other news, as there is so much tech product coming out, all over the world.
If there was a non apple biased version of engadget, I would use that one.
But to exclude all new about Apple is not nearly the same thing. Still some reviews are biased. And you miss out on some interesting news. Apple has some interesting products, but they simply are not interesting enough for the article balance to be the way it is.
@JonHolstein
Exactly. I always wondered how much of apples sales are because of how much overwhelming hype they get.
When apple releases a phone, there's an epic 60 day countdown, coverage of te countdown, and a world class launch event with a nerd dancing around his new god device.
When someone else releases a phone... The product just sort of, slips into availability. And thats it.
@JonHolstein
Take a look at the comment frequency - the red dots are almost invariably related to Apple articles. It generates traffic and hits. The readers should hold the blog editors to account, but to expect them to de-emphasize Apple is as bad as accusing them of being Apple-biased. If this site was fundamentally biased, the ratio of Apple to non-Apple posts wouldn't be 1:15 (which is is on average). This is a free market and if there is a need for an Apple-ignorant gadget blog, it will be created and nourished by those in similar mind.
Personally, I want to read about all gadgets and any site that excludes one source or another would be like reading Pravda during the Cold War.
@JonHolstein
The comments are alway so flooded with "there's too much apple". If you hate it so much, stop visiting this site. It doesn't matter if your comments are positive or negative, as long as all of you keep generating traffic you are creating ad revenue for the website.
Actions speak louder than words. Stop complaining and start doing. There are plenty alternatives.
Apparently Goole bought the rights to Android :P
Sorry, I'm a grammar nazi
@wizkidweb
Too bad spelling ≠ grammar.
@wizkidweb
Nazi, should be capitalized.
You fucking fail.
@A25i
It is so funny how someone will be first to correct a flaw in someone else's sentence while clearly having an error in their own.
You don't need a comma after Nazi buddy.
@A25i There shouldn't have been a comma in that sentence.
You effing fail.
@seanGadget
Unless less he was calling that other guy a Nazi.
@seanGadget however, you need a comma after Nazi :P
Exactly, Apps doesnt mean that much if the phone cant do anything by itself. iPhone has lots of apps but it cant do too much by itself.
@statickeith
so much android trolling lately
@statickeith The iPhone can do plenty by itself...
@Godfail like? Can it do HDMI out? Does it have USB-on-the-go? Free GPS? FLASH? Does it have an open source OS? Does it have true multitasking? Great Multimedia capabilities?
Nope.
Nokia can easily do all that. So can Android
@Godfail
Lol
I see what you did there, and it's very clever :P
@statickeith
"Great Multimedia capabilities?"
Well the iPhone does have this one IMO.
@Godfail
Except make calls if you're not wearing gloves.
@statickeith
Wtf are you talking about?
I am not a fan of the iPhone by any means, but I have to admit that it has some of the best, if not THE best, multimedia capabilities out there.
@statickeith Yeah... Too bad the user experience isn't nearly as nice. Features on paper are easy; creating an amazing user experience that can only be described after using one isn't.
@statickeith
well i guess an open source OS and flash... oh wait FLASH must be great but i'll go for the usable device.
trololololo
@statickeith
the F does that mean??? it can't do stuff by itself?
You mean if you take all the 3rd party software off an HP computer... it should... what? Still be an awesome computer cuz... you can party in Notepad?
Huh? Now the Anti-Apple guys are... bashing 3rd party development? The Hell??
@BigJayDogg3 the piece of shit still can't even play divx/xvid. Here's the deal when it comes to codecs the "scene" makes the rules and everyone falls in line to make players compatible EXCEPT Apple. Nothing like spending 2 hours to convert a TV show to "ipod compatible" It's exactly what Apple wants "ugh this player doesn't play divx and takes forever to convert it so I will just buy the show from iTunes even though I already pay for cable, I like buying things twice"
@teh jughead jailbreak it.
is it really taking people this long to realize that you can do much more when its jailbroken?
jailbreak has had everything the ios 4 has had for a long time, including divx support. flash? who cares honestly. are you really using your phone that much that you need flash? if so, use a computer. its not worth it. open source os? why, so a shxtload of security flaws come out like a possible virus?
@statickeith
So by implication, you have a body that (I assume) is pretty much like everyone else's, but without a brain you can't do much (no assumption). See how easy it is to be nasty. Good comments are a little harder. So try harder.
@BigJayDogg3 media yes, not multimedia in a true sense, try playing a mkv or xvid file you grabbed of the internet on an iPhone, now do that with a Galaxy S, now thats "real" multimedia.
@xJavonta "Jailbreak it" wow. That is a lame answer. Jailbreaking is a great thing, don't get me wrong, but those jailbroken apps/features SHOULD be standard.
@Wesscoast I did give you a +1, because you are absolutely correct. However, IMHO, 3rd party support is great for a user experience, but it's also great when developers can do things like: improve the browser (there were always options, but they were all the same thing essentially with a skin until Opera Mini came, and if there wasn't such a fuss over Google Voice and the FCC & FTC breathing down Apple's neck we may have very well seen it get rejected...maybe 50/50, but forgive me for speculating there).
Doing things like attempting to improve a keyboard, duplicate and possibly improve upon things like dialers, VOIP (skype took forever to be properly supported).
...There's something to be said for the 3rd party supports it, in the past, has limited itself from getting and what will not happen in the future.
@Godfail "The iPhone can do plenty by itself..."
Great, the only thing bothers me is Apple's false claim and get away with it so "many" times.
@teh jughead
Two hours, lol. Maybe you should be using a Mac if it's taking that long on your PC.
@MrLinux
Be familiar with the OS and it's Apps before Bashing it. I can play ANY video file from ANYWHERE using the "Air Video" app. All my videos are transcoded in real time and I can stream them even over 3g. It works on my ipad and my iphone. It's almost magical. Best $2.99 I ever spent. iOS is a beautiful complete package.