The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
June 28, 2010
Presidential Memorandum: Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
SUBJECT:Unleashing the Wireless Broadband Revolution
America's future competitiveness and global technology leadership depend, in part, upon the availability of additional spectrum. The world is going wireless, and we must not fall behind. The resurgence of American productivity growth that started in the 1990s largely reflects investments by American companies, the public sector, and citizens in the new communications technologies that are what we know today as the Internet. The Internet, as vital infrastructure, has become central to the daily economic life of almost every American by creating unprecedented opportunities for small businesses and individual entrepreneurs. We are now beginning the next transformation in information technology: the wireless broadband revolution.
Few technological developments hold as much potential to enhance America's economic competitiveness, create jobs, and improve the quality of our lives as wireless high-speed access to the Internet. Innovative new mobile technologies hold the promise for a virtuous cycle -- millions of consumers gain faster access to more services at less cost, spurring innovation, and then a new round of consumers benefit from new services. The wireless revolution has already begun with millions of Americans taking advantage of wireless access to the Internet.
Expanded wireless broadband access will trigger the creation of innovative new businesses, provide cost-effective connections in rural areas, increase productivity, improve public safety, and allow for the development of mobile telemedicine, telework, distance learning, and other new applications that will transform Americans' lives.
Spectrum and the new technologies it enables also are essential to the Federal Government, which relies on spectrum for important activities, such as emergency communications, national security, law enforcement, aviation, maritime, space communications, and numerous other Federal functions. Spectrum is also critical for many State, local, and tribal government functions. As the wireless broadband revolution unfolds, innovation can enable efficient and imaginative uses of spectrum to maintain and enhance the Government's capabilities.
In order to achieve mobile wireless broadband's full potential, we need an environment where innovation thrives, and where new capabilities also are secure, trustworthy, and provide appropriate safeguards for users' privacy. These characteristics will continue to be important to the adoption of mobile wireless broadband.
This new era in global technology leadership will only happen if there is adequate spectrum available to support the forthcoming myriad of wireless devices, networks, and applications that can drive the new economy. To do so, we can use our American ingenuity to wring abundance from scarcity, by finding ways to use spectrum more efficiently. We can also unlock the value of otherwise underutilized spectrum and open new avenues for spectrum users to derive value through the development of advanced, situation-aware spectrum-sharing technologies.
I therefore am hereby directing that executive departments, agencies, and offices, and strongly encourage that independent agencies, take the following steps:
Section 1. The Secretary of Commerce, working through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), shall:
(a) collaborate with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to make available a total of 500 MHz of Federal and nonfederal spectrum over the next 10 years, suitable for both mobile and fixed wireless broadband use. The spectrum must be available to be licensed by the FCC for exclusive use or made available for shared access by commercial and Government users in order to enable licensed or unlicensed wireless broadband technologies to be deployed;
(b) collaborate with the FCC to complete by October 1, 2010, a specific Plan and Timetable for identifying and making available 500 MHz of spectrum as described in subsection (a) of this section. For purposes of successfully implementing any repurposing of existing spectrum in accordance with subsection (a) of this section, the Plan and Timetable must take into account the need to ensure no loss of critical existing and planned Federal, State, local, and tribal government capabilities, the international implications, and the need for appropriate enforcement mechanisms and authorities;
(c) convene the Policy and Plans Steering Group (PPSG) to advise NTIA on achieving the objectives in subsections (a) and (b) of this section. The Secretaries of Defense, the Treasury, Transportation, State, the Interior, Agriculture, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, the Administrators of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Federal Aviation Administration, the Director of National Intelligence, the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard, and the head of any other executive department or agency that is currently authorized to use spectrum shall participate and cooperate fully, or in the case of independent agencies are strongly encouraged to, in the activities of the Department of Commerce in accomplishing subsections (a) and (b) of this section and promptly provide appropriate funding and staff resources for agency support to these efforts and the work of the PPSG; and
(d) submit, not later than 180 days after the Plan and Timetable described in subsection (b) of this section are completed, to the National Economic Council (NEC), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) an interim report to assess progress against the Plan and Timetable developed in accordance with subsection (b) of this section. Additional interim reports shall be submitted 180 days after the submission of the first interim report and then annually thereafter until such time as the Plan and Timetable are completed. In preparing these reports, the Secretary of Commerce shall work cooperatively with the FCC and other relevant departments, agencies, and offices.
Sec. 2. The Director of OMB shall work with the Secretary of Commerce, through NTIA and in consultation with affected departments, agencies, and offices, to incorporate into the Plan and Timetable referred to in section 1(b) of this memorandum adequate funding, incentives, and assistance to enable executive agencies or other affected entities to accomplish the actions specified in section 1(a) of this memorandum.
Sec. 3. The Secretary of Commerce, working through NTIA, in consultation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, NASA, and other agencies as appropriate, shall create and implement a plan to facilitate research, development, experimentation, and testing by researchers to explore innovative spectrum-sharing technologies, including those that are secure and resilient.
Sec. 4. The FCC is strongly encouraged to work closely with the Department of Commerce, through NTIA, to carry out this memorandum as it relates to the FCC, including the repurposing of nonfederal Government spectrum as appropriate and identifying the mechanisms necessary to ensure compliance with the FCC's decisions.
Sec. 5. The NEC, the OMB, and the OSTP (in consultation with the Department of Commerce, working through NTIA, FCC, and the National Security Staff) shall assess, based on the interim report developed pursuant to section 1(d) of this memorandum, whether there has been sufficient progress in achieving the objectives of this memorandum or whether some other mechanism, such as an independent review panel, is needed to address those areas where sufficient progress is not occurring. The NEC, the OMB, and the OSTP shall make any necessary recommendations to the President regarding such progress 45 days after receiving the initial interim report required by section 1(d) of this memorandum and, as appropriate, following subsequent reports.
Sec. 6.
(a) To the extent permitted by law and within existing appropriations, the Department of Commerce, through NTIA, shall provide administrative support for the interagency groups created in this memorandum.
(b) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect the functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(c) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to require the disclosure of classified information, law enforcement sensitive information, or other information that must be protected in the interests of national security.
(d) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(e) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 7. The Secretary of Commerce is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
BARACK OBAMA
Get on it!
@pastorbob
wow, our government needs to back down already, let the private sector grow and fall on its own.. They really need to focus on one thing at a time because I can't remember the last goal they ever accomplished.
@ruby
Just FYI, FCC is the only one in the US that can reallocate spectrum. So they are the only ones that can do this job. Just lettin you know so you can stop sounding dumb. (Exception to this is world wide spectrum such as GlobalStar. FCC doesn't have complete control over there spectrum because of treaties to allocate the same spectrum world wide)
@ruby You must not be a big reader, there's a lot going on every day, read up. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/
@pastorbob
That's what she said.
@corylulu
thanks for the info on the subject, I don't know much about reallocating spectrum. I was just kinda speaking in general terms about everything.. I get frustrated whenever I hear about white house or obama "plans".
@ruby
Aside from the highway infrastructure, national/local law enforcement, Defence security, public schooling, fire departments, The list goes on and on.
@ruby
Stop watching Fox News. Stop listening to party politics. It's sad to say that the most balanced name on TV right now for news is The Daily Show, and THATS sad.
CNN second to that, if your into really dry news.
But when you actually put down individual things Obama has done and put it to poll, he has an overwhelmingly high approval rating on the actions he has done. especially for health care.
@corylulu
What? "...overwhelmingly high approval rating on the actions he has done. especially for health care??" With 52% in favor of repealing the health care bill, I don't know how that translates into overwhelmingly high approval ratings.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law
@corylulu
Haha don't even get me started.. I don't watch any news station.. I actually form my own opinion from listening to actual house meetings on cspan and articles from around the world.. but thanks for assuming you know me.
you must not care much about the foundation America was built on if you don't see what's happening to this country. you are the one that sounds dumb now.. I may not be an expert on the spectrum crap but I'm very educated on the history of this country, free markets, world economies and human interaction.
.goodnight.
sorry, I have to get back to work because I don't believe in the government giving me "Change" if you know what I mean.
@ruby
I hear Somalia has a Government that stays out of peoples business..
i actually think it has no government at all, you might really like it there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QDv4sYwjO0
@Abe
Rasmussen is a media outfit by their own description, not a polling firm. They are also blatantly and openly Republican.
During a campaign they put out surveys that will almost always show the GOP candidate far out in front, often to a ridiculous amount, all to drive the news cycle.
Then other polls, from real polling companies like Gallup or PPP or SurveyUSA come out with stats totally different that Ras. Only when the election comes close does Ras do a real poll because its the one that is remembered.
Rasmussen is the Fox News of polling: totally worthless.
@corylulu
Just about everything you said was wrong. The opinions on Fox News are biased. They are on every other channel as well. It's just that Fox goes right as everyone else leans left. O'Reilly may be the smartest man on the planet.
Really with Jon Stewart???
Ohh and every poll is now showing him sinking below 40 % (not just Rathsmusen). He has around 50% dissapproval.
Spew your left wing talking points elsewhere.
@cobjones "O'Reilly may be the smartest man on the planet"
Dear God.
@ruby
So you get frustrated when a government put in place by the people and for the people tries to protect the people from big industry and the top 1% of the US population? so... Lets apologize to BP, give them back their money, let the Tax payers pay for it, and screw the fisherman, because, you know, that not the only place where shrimp is catches? Or better yet, play them (BP and others) to drill in the sea (thru subsidies) while they have already got the capital and make plenty of money to already make it a very profitable biz? I think I've found the solution to the debt problem, remove silly subsidies from giant corporations and actually collect the royalties that we are owed and i think we can significantly reduce our debt.
@cobjones "O'Reilly may be the smartest man on the planet"
If true, the world has to create a fund for giant spaceships to leave this planet and actually fund schools in it. Because O'Reilly is dumb as George Bush, and if i'm not mistaken he might wear a tin foil hat.
@cobjones
Ohh and every poll is now showing him sinking below 40 % (not just Rathsmusen). He has around 50% dissapproval."
I'm sure the fact that Fox (sickeningly the most watched "news" station) is laying the blame for the BP oil spill and his lack of response, despite him having people flown down there the day after it happened, doesn't have anything to do with it.
The other stations lean left, there is no doubt about that but Faux news leans so far to the Right that they might as well just go ahead and rename it to the Republican Conservative News Network. They sure as hell don't follow their "Fair and balanced" tag line.
@rstoplabe14
If you took the time to watch and research you would understand. Its funny when he is on Stewarts show Jon has nothing to say. I don't agree with everything on Fox, but a hell of a lot more than MSNBC, NBC, or ABC... CNN is okay, but boring as hell. If you would watch O'Reilly then you would see how rational he is. He is far from far right on his views.
I am a libertarian and I still think he is smart. I think the government should be as small as possible. The FCC isn't needed. If we really need the spectrum then someone would invest in it. We don't need some lifetime politician telling us what we need. If a company does you wrong, then switch companies. Don't complain to the government. You can do what you want, but don't force it on me too.
Also, these comments are filled with this liberal crap all the time, and I don't get it. The free market (capitalism) gave us the technology that enables us to post here. As much as everyone here complains about big companies, where would we be without them? Do you thing the government would have come up with the iPhone or Android OS? I really doubt it.
I know most don't realize this, but these big corporations hire millions of people. I think companies should be responsible and held liable. I know not every company does the right thing (ei BP), but most do the right thing. Do you know why? Because that is what grows business.
Now that I am done I will be happy to realize that the downrank will garner me more attention.
@cobjones
"The free market (capitalism) gave us the technology that enables us to post here. " Not true, the computer was developed by the US Army. It was called the ENIAC, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENIAC also, the internet was developed by the US Military to network together radars and nuclear bunkers during the cold war. GPS technology was developed by the US Department of Defense in 1973.
Good, only about ten years late, but good.
What a double standard ! Federal worker and military not suppoposed to use wireless technology in the office afraid of been hack, yet white house can use such, don't they afraid of hacker nearby?
@techlord The article says nothing about the WH actually using wireless, and they don't.
@techlord
has anyone ever really been as far as decided to look more like
@avengeryarr
going on what the fuck is?
Obama Does.
@Cwill127 yes we can!
@Cwill127 spend money
@Cwill127 What Nintendon't?
@MrGrinch
Better to spend it on things that are needed.
I still want to know where of the "I'm outraged that the government is spending money!" people were when our last President was borrowing untold amounts of money to fund wars we didn't need. Why were you complaining then. Oh, wait because it was "your guy" doing it and that makes it okay.
@Bacchus027 Bush? The war we didn't need? I'm not saying that I agree with everything he did but at least he had the balls to do it. And as for Obama, he talks out of his ass. Everything he says makes him sound like a jack ass.
@Bacchus027
Those of us with brains (as opposed to registered members of a major party) were even angrier at Bush than we are at Obama.
So I suppose we just throw the Constitution out during these four years? It doesn't work that way... it can't work that way. History dictates that we are heading to end if we continue down this path. Freedom is what this country was founded on... do we really want to lose it?
@AdamZSG what the hell are you talking about?
@AdamZSG
Whatever you're high on, I want two.
@sevenVIIghosts
obama is the antichrist and all of our freedoms are being taken way... isnt it obvious?
or was i the only other one who caught this fox news nonsense in an article about bringing internet to the population......
@AdamZSG
I think I'd like it better if you were uninformed, instead of misinformed.
@AdamZSG
lol
@AdamZSG
Good God, another Tea Partier nut. Where did all these fruitcakes come from all of a sudden, I miss the days of Bush and his backers already.
@AdamZSG
Glen Beck?
is that you?
@AdamZSG
I support the ideas behind the Tea Party movement, but I have to say that your comment seems bizarre considering that we are talking about reallocating spectrum... Government DOES have it's legitimate uses, you know.
@Abe
Supporting the "IDEAS" and actually supporting a party are 2 very different things. And I can list to many examples, and how those ideas can be warped. One good example is those tea party militias (does hutari ring a bell?) or how about we abolish the civil rights act because "its big government telling businesses what to do" , or how about Ms. Angle from Nevada, well there are too many things to list about her, lol.
Too late
who's ass is he going to kick?
@eli your's if you don't STFU.
I like how the government thinks ten years is fast. How about this time next year? This seems like a fancy way of saying they will put this on the backburner and it might get done... Someday.
@gfrantz Welcome to Democracy, the slowest form of government ever
@sevenVIIghosts
You must be talking about some other country, because the United States is not a "democracy."
@gfrantz
You need to realize it takes time, resources and collaboration to make sure spectrum available except if it is current unused. Organizations need to order equipment, put out RFPs, bids, schedule with vendors who may need to provide custom solutions; the list goes on.
Also, you have to consider laws that mandate how public institutions must interact to get this spectrum swap completed. There has to be transparency to avoid/limit any appearance of favoritism or discrimination, etc. When you begin to consider all these hurdles, 10 years does not seem that long.
It is good for the industry and consumers that the WH is focusing on high speed broadband as a resource that everyone can have access to.
@sevenVIIghosts
That is the saddest thing I've ever heard...
@sevenVIIghosts
I guess you're in support of Dictatorships, seeing as they are the most efficient.