800*480 is to low a resolution. Side-scrolling may be fine with a phone, but once we have a proper tablet I expect at least a 1024*600-resolution. But 1280*xxx would be even better. While most websites work just fine with a 1024-horizontal resolution more and more seem to work best with larges resolutions than that.
@Stranger2 I don't really expect better resolution at that price, but I do wish they had worked on the battery life a bit more. And while I know that a snapdragon is well out of this price range that CPU makes me sad.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
800*480 is to low a resolution. Side-scrolling may be fine with a phone, but once we have a proper tablet I expect at least a 1024*600-resolution. But 1280*xxx would be even better. While most websites work just fine with a 1024-horizontal resolution more and more seem to work best with larges resolutions than that.
@Stranger2 It's $150. If it were 1024x600, it'd cost more.
@Stranger2 I don't really expect better resolution at that price, but I do wish they had worked on the battery life a bit more. And while I know that a snapdragon is well out of this price range that CPU makes me sad.