NPD: Android is now top-selling OS in American smartphones
Step aside, BlackBerrys and iPhones, the American consumer has voted with his wallet and picked Android as his favorite flavor in the quarter just gone. NPD's number crunchers have just announced their findings for Q2 2010, concluding that 33 percent of phones sold during the period had Android on board. This marks the first time in eons (Q4 2007, to be more precise) that RIM has not held the crown of most purchased smartphone OS on US soil, with its BlackBerrys accounting for 28% of the market and Apple's iPhone occupying third spot with 22%. Motorola and HTC are the key suspects fingered for Android's continuing ascent, with the "large screen allure" of their handsets playing well with the buying public. Skip after the break for a more detailed breakdown.
Disclaimer: NPD's Ross Rubin is a contributor to Engadget.
Disclaimer: NPD's Ross Rubin is a contributor to Engadget.
The NPD Group: Motorola, HTC drive Android to Smartphone OS lead in the U.S.
Android now installed in one of every three smartphones sold at retail. BlackBerry OS share drops 9 points to 28 percent.
PORT WASHINGTON, NEW YORK, August 4, 2010 - Riding the wave of new handset introductions and wide carrier distribution in the second quarter (Q2), the Android smartphone operating system (OS) continued its upward climb in the U.S. consumer mobile phone market, according to The NPD Group, a leading market research company. For the first time since the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2007, RIM fell to second position, as Android took the lead among operating systems in handsets sold to U.S. consumers. NPD's latest wireless market research reveals that Android accounted for 33 percent of all smartphones purchased in Q2, ahead of RIM (28 percent) and Apple (22 percent).
"For the second consecutive quarter, Android handsets have shown strong but slowing sell-through market share gains among U.S. consumers," said Ross Rubin, executive director of industry analysis for NPD. "While the Google-developed OS took market share from RIM, Apple's iOS saw a small gain this quarter on the strength of the iPhone 4 launch."
Based on U.S. consumer purchases of mobile phones in Q2, the top 5 Android smartphones were as follows:
Motorola Droid
HTC Droid Incredible
HTC EVO 4G
HTC Hero
HTC Droid Eris
"Blackberry 6 will soon offer features that have been popular in recently launched Android handsets, such as support for capacitive touchscreens and a WebKit-based browser. However, the Blackberry Torch lacks the large screen allure that has characterized the best selling Android devices at its price point, including the Droid Incredible and EVO 4G," Rubin said.
Model selection and promotions continue to play a role in the race for carrier dominance. According to NPD's Mobile Phone Track, Verizon Wireless has maintained its lead among top carriers for the last three quarters comprising a third (33 percent) of the units sold in the U.S. mobile phone market in Q2, followed by AT&T (25 percent), Sprint (12 percent), and T-Mobile (11 percent). In Q2 Verizon Wireless continued their buy-one-get-one (BOGO) offers on all smartphones, including both RIM and Android models.
In spite of an overall decline in the number of mobile phones purchased year over year, the ongoing popularity of both messaging phones and smartphones, which are generally more costly than standard feature phones, resulted in slightly higher prices for all mobile phones in Q2. The average selling price for all mobile phones reached $90, which is a 3 percent increase since Q2 last year. Smartphone unit prices, by comparison, averaged $143 in Q2 2010, which is a 9 percent decrease over the previous year.
Data Note: The information in this press release is from Mobile Phone Track – NPD's consumer tracking of U.S. consumers, aged 18 and older, who reported purchasing a mobile phone. NPD does not track corporate/enterprise mobile phone purchases.






















@rommel
What the hell are you saying?
@LlamaRiot
What? How'd that comment get there?
I hope this means we can finally stop using the term "iPhone Killer".
@scoobydooby
Obviously its going to sell like crazy, if its free to license.
@uckApple
Androids platform is #1, because its free, and anyone can license it.
If it were truly #1, that means that their devices would have to also be #1.
This is media taking some data, and using it to the advantage that they have.
@scoobydooby
IOS killed
iPhanboys, commence your bitterness, resentfulness and flamage... NOW!
@uckApple Sounds to me like you're a little hurt at this fact. Why are you so defensive when a competing product is successful?
@uckApple
The Galaxy S and SuperSonic (Evo!) is No1, what're you on about?
@uckApple Licensing costs on Windows Mobile or Symbian were never that high - at least not when compared to hardware costs. I don't think licensing costs were ever that big an issue - the issue is that some OS platforms (WebOS, iOS and Blackberry) were never available for others to use.
The only options for hardware makers were WinMo, Symbian and now Android. So I'd like to think that Android wins purely on features and looks, not cost.
Also - companies like Motorola and HTC pump millions into development of their own Android apps and components, so the OS isn't exactly "free".
@scoobydooby
Biggest mistake by Apple- exclusivity with AT&T. I know us techies love android, but I know a whole bunch of regular people who want an iPhone but are stuck on a different carrier and are 'settling' for something that's ''similar''.
I know I'm gonna get downranked for this, but if the iPhone was on Verizon and Sprint there would be a lot more iPhones sold and a lot less Android phones sold.
@OCJP Sorry it is more like hemorr-droids commence your gloating :-) Jokes aside, this is completely expected. This is like comparing Apples to a bushel of oranges (pun intended). How many Android phones are there and how many iOS phones are out there? How many carriers have Android? This is not a fair comparison. But I congratulate Android on the milestone. And this trend will only continue as more and more companies embrace the free platform. The main thing to see is who makes the most profit.
@scoobydooby I personally have the iPhone 4 and love it. but I'll admit that Google has been doing great things with Android. this sort of competition as great and will drive both companies to do better.
@DonClark - No downrank at all, you are spot on. If the iPhone made it to all major carriers, there would be no Android. Android was a hit because people on T-mobile, Verizon and Sprint wanted a good phone without having to switch to AT&T.
In the end, the contract with AT&T will probably go down as one of Apples biggest mistakes ever made.
@scoobydooby Ok, let me be the first to say I love Android and I own an EVO. But c'mon, let's face facts. In 2Q, people were waiting to buy the iPhone 4 and can account for drop in sales of Apple sales.
I'm curious to see what the next quarter's sales figures will be. If the results are the same, then yeah - Android is the new "king of the hill".
@uckApple Don't downplay success just because the outcome wasn't the one you wanted. Makes you look bad.
@kstagg Sure -but how many of those people already had an iPhone?
I'm going to make a completely random guess here and claim that 80% of iPhone 4 buyers already owned an iPhone, 3G or 3GS - so their 4G purchase isn't going to raise numbers that much.
@uckApple
Large companies understand that "free to license" doesn't mean much when you figure in in-house development and support costs, and it's often cheaper to pay a reasonable license fee for stable well-supported code. I'm pretty sure that if Android were a piece of junk that needed a lot of custom development work before being fit for production they wouldn't touch it, free or not.
Therefore, I think it's fair to conclude that companies like Motorola, Samsung, HTC etc. have found that Android is good enough on its own to allow them to create compelling and desirable products, irrespective of its free status.
@scoobydooby
You sir are an idiot...Do you think Apple making billions off of iPhone sales is a mistake? It isn't like they are in the red, they are FAR from it! lol
And of course there would still be Android. Do you think everyone in the world wants 1 company to dictate what their phone should and shouldn't do? It is all about choice!!
@JojoMojo Thank you for reiterating my point. Next...
@DonClark Did you know pizza is food, you know you can get to point A to point B in a car. I'm just joking but you stated the obvious.
@JojoMojo
You're an idiot!
"Comparing apples to a bushel of oranges" there is no pun because they are both plural you idiot.
Nice try with the slight and the fake congratulations
@therealbiglou So it took 2-3 different manufacturers to complete this task. Imagine if iOS4 was available to different manufacturers. Think Mcfly.....THINK !
@JojoMojo
Thats a short term look at things. This phone war is no different from the PC wars of the 1980's.
Apple sat on their a$$ tried to become exclusive and tried to demand developers around their way. What happened - Microsoft came out with a more 'open' OS and we know how that went, mac os is a niche platform with 5% of marketshare.
The same thing will happen with iphone, less developers will be motivated to target iphone os when competing platforms have well above 90% marketshare (in a few years), and then you will have the same as the mac - less developers making software for it and a device for a niche.
At one time the mac dominated, and all developers flocked to it - mostly because that was where the money and marketshare was it, once that fell apart everyone flocked to the bigger platform and that hasnt changed for 30 years. iPhone already within 3 years is getting put to the curb.
Apple once was the biggest seller of computers = no longer the case
Apple once was the biggest seller of phones = no longer the case
@tute the survey closed before the iPhone 4 went on sale.
@JojoMojo " How many Android phones are there and how many iOS phones are out there? How many carriers have Android? This is not a fair comparison."
It's a comparison of SMART PHONE OS sales numbers. It's not a comparison of which manufacturer or carrier is "the best one". Jesus Christ. Is it that hard to understand?
@Immortal78 Yes McFly - imagine if HTC made an iOS phone - it wouldn't hang up if you held it wrong, it wouldn't be called "magical" and it wouldn't be made of ground up unicorn placenta.
It would probably even have a sliding keyboard and 100's of custom roms.
Cool, now that Android is #1, can we *please* see a reduction of the massive Fandroid astroturfing campaign? "ANDROID FTW" got tired about 6 months ago.
@scoobydooby
Sure you can... when you realize that the iPhone is still the best phone in the world, still has the best App ecosystem, still has the best media, still has 100 million iOS devices already in people's hands...And Google hasn't done anything to take market cap away from Apple... Apple keeps going up and GOOG keeps going down.
I guess thats cuz Google doesn't sell phones, or OSes.
Oops.
@JojoMojo This is no different than the computer market. There are zillions more Windows PCs by countless makers sold than there are by the sole-source for MacOSX.
I'm an Apple fan but that's the reality.
@therealbiglou So it took 2-3 different manufacturers to complete this milestone. Imagine if iOS4 was available to different manufacturers. Think Mcfly......THINK! ! !
@DonClark
That exclusivity is what made Apple billions in profit. AT&T paid for that exclusivity in the form of high subsidy to the phone. If there were several carriers offering the phone, the device would have been more expensive to the customer up-front.
The AT&T exclusivity was a very lucrative move by Apple. But time will tell if it was a good long-term strategy.
@OCJP
I'll bite: by pointing out this was, before iphone 4, and really doesn't mean anything compared to the world wide share (where ATT isn't a problem)...
Apple's not 'locked to one Carrier' in every market, girls.
Oh yeah, and then there's the lawsuit against HTC...
*snickers
@DonClark I agree if Apple did not have that contract with AT&T they would be so far out in front by now. Things will get really interesting once that contract expires. Should be good for buyers.
@scoobydooby
You are joking right?
You must mean RIM killer.
@scoobydooby
I can't agree it was a big mistake... With Apple's pricing model, they had no choice but to lock in with a carrier who would subsidize the phone. The majority of the buying public would not pay the unsubsidized cost of an iPhone.
So... 2 options. Shave your margins, or lock in with a carrier to pay a chunk of it. They chose option 2, and have sold a lot of phones as a result. And since they were able to keep their high margins, they have made quite a lot of money for themselves and their shareholders.
I'm saying all this as a semi-educated consumer. I decided to get an iPhone knowing full well I was locking into AT&T. I'm not crazy about it, but I can live with it.
"the American consumer has voted with his wallet and picked Android"
=
Sure, Engadget, you can vote with your "brains" for Apple. Because this is how you translate this news.
F* off & make sure you don't drop your shiny glass phone. Because you may crack his quality.
@scoobydooby
I agree; the Android OS is a success, and iPhone still is doing record numbers. There's plenty of room for everyone here.
iPhone is dead - long live the iPhone...
@scoobydooby I hear there's an Android killer being released next year ;)
@scoobydooby: Apple still wins regardless of whether majority of iPhone4 owners previously owned an iPhone. AT&T on the other hand, not so much. It helps them with retention though. On the subject of Android, I agree that had the iPhone been released on all carrier, Android wouldn't be doing as well; however, I don't know if it would have changed the eventual outcome.
@DonClark Well put
@jonbruc
Uhh no. Q2 incledes June any ip4l
Launch
@DonClark that's a lie. In UK Android grew 3x. Some people just don't want to jailbreak their phones.
@AndroidFanBoy
No more iPhone Killer, now it's Android Killer bitches!
iPhone 5, the new Android Killer?!
@Metaluna
"Android were a piece of junk that needed a lot of custom development work before being fit for production they wouldn't touch it, free or not."
Hahahah, and MS gets royalties from the OEMs whenever they ship Android... So funny...
@OCJP More like you keep fooling yourself that Andriod achieved not because it was free so you hide behind calling us names.
@scoobydooby
Don't discount the power of Free and Open. Not only is there no charge, but you have the source code, to make changes and you don't have to worry as much that provider will change the terms on you, or let it stagnate like Microsoft did with old WinMo.
I see Android staying on top for years to come...
I am not a fanboy of any sort. Android/Apple/Rim will all do well, all backed by North American companies. It is all good. I think Nokia is going to hurt more.
Nice to see Motorola back in the game on Phone design as well.
@DonClark
I don't think a WHOLE lot of more iPhones would be sold and a whole lot less of Androids would be sold. Infact, it could actually be the opposite. iPhones are known for having build quality issues and that bad publicity would be more widespread thus leading to bad reputation and lower sales. Right now the exclusive deal with ATT gives people iPhone envy and so it creates Apple hype. I for one am not tricked into by hype and see through the lies of Steve Jobs and all the cApple issues. So it's very possible that iPhone sales would be less then what they are now because more people would know about these issues and would lead people into NOT wanting an iPhone.
@kstagg Still, Apple has never been #1. They've always been #2 to RIM. And now Android has entirely leapfrogged Apple.
A change in the release date of iPhone 4 wouldn't have changed this.
Go Android
I knew this day was going to come.
Happy Nexus One owner here.
Next Step: Android tablets (+ TV)