The Hague to Samsung: no injunction for 3G patent infringement if Apple's willing to FRAND license
![](https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/MI91fKgfRA9SgoQYVHGkQQ--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTM1MA--/https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/BjzrQEFyuvcR.x30jcB7Aw--~B/aD0xOTA7dz01MjE7YXBwaWQ9eXRhY2h5b24-/https://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/03/apple-v-sammy.jpg)
Since it's been more than 24 hours since the last bit of news in the ongoing legal battle between Samsung and Apple, we figured you could do with another litigation revelation. Late last year, the Hague shot down Sammy's request to prevent iPads and iPhones from being sold in the Netherlands. Today, the Dutch court went a step further, telling the Korean company that it can't pursue any other injunctions based upon its FRAND 3G patents as long as Cupertino's willing to talk about licensing them. Not only that, it went on to hold that those patents don't apply in Sammy's case against the iPhone 4S due to the theory of patent exhaustion. The allegedly infringing bits in the handset are made by Qualcomm, who licensed the technology directly from Samsung -- granting Apple protection under the license as a third party beneficiary -- and Apple prevailed using arguments not unlike those it made in a suit it recently filed against Motorola. Score one more legal victory for Tim Cook and company, but as you already know, the war is far from over.