Skip to Content
This guy obviously did this a while ago, or has been living in a hole when it comes to .NET. .NET 2.0 has serial support, which is the reason he said he had to use VB5 (why not VB6 in that case)System.IO.Ports.SerialPort is a nice little class.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
AyAn4m1 @ Aug 28th 2006 8:42PM
This guy obviously did this a while ago, or has been living in a hole when it comes to .NET. .NET 2.0 has serial support, which is the reason he said he had to use VB5 (why not VB6 in that case)
System.IO.Ports.SerialPort is a nice little class.