It's a shame the dropped Nick's comments, but I have to say, Jason pretty much nailed it.
Engadget should chagrined to have allowed an obvious misrepresentation of the situation between the wifi and battery standards groups. Trust me; these are NOT the same folks. The commenter was either incredibly naive, or trying to spread misinformation.
To his point on .11n, yeah, the latest I've heard; comments in the thousands, and at least half of them are 'technical' not 'editorial', so there is still a big chunk of work going on.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
It's a shame the dropped Nick's comments, but I have to say, Jason pretty much nailed it.
Engadget should chagrined to have allowed an obvious misrepresentation of the situation between the wifi and battery standards groups. Trust me; these are NOT the same folks. The commenter was either incredibly naive, or trying to spread misinformation.
To his point on .11n, yeah, the latest I've heard; comments in the thousands, and at least half of them are 'technical' not 'editorial', so there is still a big chunk of work going on.