Windows Vista upgrade guide, part 2: hardware

Sure, anyone can hit up Microsoft's Vista Upgrade Advisor to get a sense of whether their XP-based box can hack it under Vista's additional load; and yes, we all know by now that any PC with an 800MHz processor, 512MB of memory, and DirectX 9-capable graphics qualifies for the coveted "Vista Capable" designation. But what exactly is Vista doing with all that silicon? And more importantly, what does better hardware buy you? Here, we break down Vista's hardware-dependent features line by line to find out what they are, what they need, and what they mean for users so if you do want to upgrade (or buy new), you'll know exactly what to buy.
See also: Windows Vista upgrade guide - part 1: software
Tablet PC features - Yes, we know it's an obvious one, but we figured it was worth mentioning since Vista offers up some key improvements in the arena: configurable pen gestures, a new tab for pen input docked to the screen's side, and a variety of improvements to handwriting recognition, among others. By and large, a Vista capable tablets or convertible laptops are required to take advantage of the goodies, though some (like the Snipping Tool for selecting arbitrary areas of the screen) are available to all. Just remember, tablet functionality is only available Home Premium, Business editions, and Ultimate, and not Home Basic.BitLocker - Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs, as they're more lovingly known), essentially chips capable of effectively locking down the systems in which they reside, have been kicking around in PCs for some time now -- particularly business-class ones -- and whether or not you may agree with their anti-consumer digital rights capabilities, Vista intends to take full advantage where it can. BitLocker theoretically does wonders for data security by encrypting not just individual files, but entire drives; Microsoft's advertising it primarily as an enterprise feature, but individuals with a healthy dose of paranoia (justified or otherwise) will be able to benefit just the same. A TPM 1.2-compliant module is required to partake in Business editions and Ultimate.
Aero / Aero Glass - Ahh, Aero... the 800 pound gorilla of the Vista user experience. Sure, you can use Vista without Aero (in fact, you have to with Home Basic Edition or if your system isn't up to snuff) but you don't really want to. It adds that final spit and polish -- that (ahem) "Wow" factor, if you will. With all its features enabled, Aero is responsible for a variety of nifty UI features like Flip 3D, taskbar thumbnails, and the frosted glass translucency (that's where the "Glass" part comes in) surrounding windows, the taskbar, and the Sidebar. Microsoft dictates that PCs running full-blown Aero Glass must be "Premium Ready," which (in part) requires a video card with a WDDM driver, hardware Pixel Shader 2.0 support, and 128MB of video memory; in reality, though, there's been widespread success getting it rolling on the lowly Intel GMA950, a staple integrated graphics chipset with shared memory found in many notebook computers of the past year.SuperFetch - From the user's perspective, the fanciest thing about SuperFetch is the catchy name. In reality, SuperFetch should prefetch frequently-used programs into RAM before the user even requests them, significantly reducing load times normally associated with drive access. Sure enough, in our brief testing, Vista Ultimate happily gobbled up nearly every last byte of our 2 gigabytes of physical RAM, even when no interactive programs were running -- very un-XP behavior, indeed. The more memory you throw at 'er, the more SuperFetch benefit you'll theoretcially see, and the snappier the computer should be during normal use and frequent task-switching.
ReadyDrive - Perhaps the most interesting and promising of Vista's hardware-based performance initiatives, ReadyDrive uses hybrid hard drives. HHDs slap together a bit of Flash memory -- kind of like the thumb drive you've got in your pocket right now -- and mix it up with a traditional hard disk drive. The benefits are obvious: frequently-accessed data can reside on the Flash, saving seeks, which in turn leads to better battery life and reduced wear and tear on the drive's mechanical components. Best of all, it's faster than a traditional drive. ReadyDrive compatible drives and equipped PCs are virtually impossible to find right now, but momentum's been building for the initiative for some time; we suspect they'll be widespread within a couple years.
ReadyBoost - So is there any way to get all of ReadyDrive's chocolatey goodness right this moment without having to hold out for the proliferation of hybrid hard drives? Yeah, sort of. ReadyBoost is another way of adding some flash into the PC's performance equation, this time by simply letting Vista use a USB drive for part of its cacheing storage. Any amount of memory from about 250MB up to 4GB can be contributed to the cause, though Microsoft's set some minimum performance standards that could disqualify many slower drives in circulation. Companies like Kingston are already starting to certify drives as ReadyBoost compatible, but in reality, any drive that can sustain 2.5MB per second for 4KB random reads and 1.75MB per second for 512KB random writes will suffice. And don't bother trying to cheat with a slower drive -- there's a test.
SideShow - Outside of Vista itself, SideShow is one of Microsoft's most aggressive initiatives for 2007, spanning a variety of devices from remote controls to picture frames. The concept is simple enough: small apps ("Gadgets") run on SideShow-compatible devices, syncing periodically with their Vista-based master PCs to offer up pertinent, glanceable information, powered-down interfaces to email and media, or just about anything else you would want an auxiliary display or widget platform to do. Prime examples include program guides and music browsers on SideShow remotes, Outlook schedules and contact information on secondary laptop displays; the list goes on. Obviously, SideShow requires specialized hardware to roll, and a pretty good selection has been primed for Vista's launch; if it takes off, we'll probably see a variety of interesting applications (and a wider selection of laptops and desktops with secondary displays) down the road.So will that ol' XP beater run Vista? If it's got 512MB of memory, yeah, it probably will. Is it a compelling upgrade on barely passable hardware? Probably not. The Premium Ready specification isn't hard to exceed by 2005 standards, and even the most inexpensive '07 box should be able to hold its own -- especially as 1 gigabyte becomes the lower threshold in all segments of the market. Over the next couple years, things should get even more interesting as Vista grows into its clothes with features like ReadyDrive and SideShow; in the meantime, we'll be passing the days amusing ourselves with Flip 3D.
So let's wrap this up by breaking it all down by the numbers, shall we? Below you'll find three separate hardware specifications: Microsoft's "Vista Capable" and "Premium Ready" recommendations, along with our slighly more aggressive ones that should provide you with a comfortable, obsolesence-resistant gaming experience.
|
"Vista Capable"
|
"Premium Ready"
|
Engadget recommends
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | 800MHz "modern processor" | 1GHz | Core 2 Duo for 64-bit and virtualization support, AMD Athlon 64 X2 or better... if you have a Core 2 Extreme, we hate you |
| Memory | 512MB | 1GB | 2GB |
| Video | Any DX9 card |
DX9, Pixel Shader 2.0, WDDM driver, 128MB video memory, 32 bits per pixel | Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX, ATI Radeon X1950 or better... you want to do this right, don't you? |
| Hard drive | No recommendation | 40GB, 15GB free space | RAID array for your home box, ReadyDrive-compliant hybrid for your portable |
| Optical drive | No recommendation | DVD-ROM drive | Blu-ray / HD DVD with write capability |
| Audio | No recommendation | "Audio output capability" | Digital output (TOSLINK, S/PDIF), 7.1 out |
| Monitor | No recommendation | No recommendation | 22-inch widescreen LCD or larger |















i hope is easy beacuse i'm a dog, a blogger dog
http://la-girasol.blogspot.com
cant wait to see the leopard install guide, 1)insert disk, 2) archive install, 3) cup of tea 4) enjoy
I wasn't sure what you meant by "Leopard." So I did a search and found this handy sneak preview on Apple's website.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html
Looks amazing!
Bah, it's never that easy for people using outdated machines. It's a feat to get Tiger to install on my lappy, Leopard will be even more impossible (if that were possible).
eww, tea is for homos.
Forgot the part where you setup Bootcamp and install Windows so your OS can "do anything Windows can". ^^
> 22-inch widescreen LCD or larger
Why do you recommend 22 inches? Wouldn't it be better to specify resolution instead (I assume 1680x1050 is what you meant)?
I think they were going for minimum-required sexiness. Personally I'd rather 1920x1200, since I'm used to 1600x1200, but a wide LCD with this native resolution demands quite the premium over a 1680x1050-capable LCD.
I see your point though; resolution would have been more helpful.
Lepord ftw, fo sho.
Windows will just never learn that their OS is a crippled old fart that needs to sleep.
I think engadget needs to stop tailoring their posts with an obvious MS biased which many others have pointed out.
Right, because Engadget is obviously biased against Mac users when they were practically spooging all over the iPhone announcements.
It just happens to be the release of a new OS. Regardless of what kind of OS it is, it deserves coverage since it will benefit someone. Considering that the majority of home and business computers around the world run a Windows OS, it affects a lot of people.
Not just Engadget, every single techblog is comprised of Apple fanboyd. So what do you expect?
Btw, I find Extremetech, PCWorld and PCMag to be more realistic in their articles. Most of their people have real jobs and not 20-yr old Apple loving yuppies. They appreciate good work by Microsoft and also criticize when needed. Lets face it, Mac OS X is good enough if all your computing is limited to browsing, blogging and using digital media. For everything else its useless.
You Mac fans are so worried about what Vista means that you make a comment on every Vista post. It sucks that Microsoft is going to continue to dominate a market that you try so hard to stop.
Leopord looks fine (even though Norris can't spell it). I've actually been using Vista for months now and I have really began to enjoy it. You can show us Leopard pics all day and it isn't going to help anything. The fact is, until you get the major retailers to start selling Mac, you won't win (Like Best Buy, Circuit City, etc).
Slow news day, huh?
I don't know one single person who has been anticipating the release of this OS, not even gamers.
It's a complete non-event.
Windows vista upgrading thats great news, now a days, everybody using windows vista. Upgrading it will be good.
http://cheap-computers-review.blogspot.com
Here's what I did to install Vista Business (standard, not enterprise) on my 1.7Ghz, 512MB of RAM, Dell laptop:
Inserted disk. Told it to reformat the drive (XP had been on there) and chose that partition to install. Answere two, maybe three screens of questions and walked away, expecting to come back and have it waiting for input from me, like XP always did. But, much to my surprise not only wasn't it waiting for me, it was done!
Damn thing took less than half the time of an XP install and even less of my attention.
A very nice surprise!
Oh, and Vista rated my video card in the laptop a '2' so it decided to use Vista Basic not Aero. I manually turned on Aero and it's fine. Last night, I did plug in a Kingsdton 1GB DataTraveler II to use as a readyboost drive. Vista took over 850MB of it. Can't say I've noticed any real speed increase - it was fine before believe it or not - but the little blue light on the jump drive is always flashging so Vista's doing something with it!
Running Office 2007 as well. That runs fine, but Outlook is a pig. What else is new? Course, so am I with my Outlook store being near 700GB. :)
I remember when a 66MHz 486 with 16MB of RAM was sufficient for 99% of all office tasks. Vista requires 50* times more processing power and RAM! Think about how much processing power this is. Opening a 1 page letter in Word now takes more processing than decompressing video or running a scientific simulation!
*(Note: I'm considering not just MHz, but instruction throughput, modern CPUs can process more instructions per clock tick than a 486.)
Hey Evan, I remember when an IBM Selectric Typewriter was good enough for 99% of all office tasks!
Other than that, good point!
ReadyBoost is limited to 2GB because of the file system. So a 4GB flash drive can only have 2GB devoted to ReadyBoost.
"cant wait to see the leopard install guide, 1)insert disk, 2) archive install, 3) cup of tea 4) enjoy"
You forgot the very first step, 1) Buy a ridiculously overpriced Apple computer.
:O
Oh yeah, $599 for a Mac Mini is EXTREMELY expensive. Give me a break, especially when the Mac Mini's upgrade to C2D $599 is cheap.
It's a good sign that you can run Aero Glass on 3-year old systems, I definitely plan on messing around with Vista on my MacBook Pro.
apple is just provides over priced crappy products
Not sure what you Mac boys are bitching about. Windows currently owns 92% share of computer users. Did you really think that the less than 5% of you out there were really going to be the dominant voice here? Please. That's like bitching that Psychiatry Today doesn't cater to the Scientologist perspective. You don't have to be a Windows fan but don't expect to not hear about it on a technology Blog site.
One VERY important thing not mentioned in this article is HDCP. If you plan on watching movies from your HD-DVD or Blu-Ray drive you MUST have both an HDCP compatible video card and monitor.
The problem with Vista is that it is literally 10 times the size of XP, and brings very little for the size.
For all you Mac/Linux boys out there...
Go to one of your dedicated blogs and bash MS. WTF? As is was already pointed out about every 3rd story has been about the IPhone. If you don't like what you see here go some where else. Complain to Apple if there just are not enough things to report on!
Guys: Anyone know if a 3.2Ghz processor (not a core duo) can handle this baby?
Stupid Vista Upgrade Advisor keeps telling me I'll be fine with Home Basic. Give me a break.
Thoughts? Thanks.
Mac is irrelevant now. Time for Apple to start making cute Chinese-made PC`s for the OS that rules the world.
Hey Chris, if that tablet feature pic is one of Engadget's screenshots, which one of you has such awful, awful penmanship? :-P
But thanks guys, for the guide. I'm sure every (rational) person here appreciates it.
I have a few questions though, and I'd REALLY appreciate it if you guys helped, especially Engadget staff since I'll be more likely to trust you (not that I wouldn't trust well-stated facts by commenters!).
I just bought a new PC. Here's the specs. Will this baby run Vista Ultimate? I can't use the adviser because I refuse to install SP2. I'm happy with SP1.
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+
1GB RAM
160GB HDD
Onboard display, NVidia 6150
If need be, I can overclock the processor. Now, PLEASE help me here. I'd really really appreciate it.
Vista Enterprise ran fine on my laptop with 1 gig of ram and a 1.8ghz Pentium 4
I have RC1 running on my desktop:
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (939)
2GB DDR
HDD doesn't matter
nVID GeForce 7800GTX
Runs perfectly fine for me.
Linux, Beryl, AIGLX
This really is an emperor's new clothes deal. For spending thousands of dollars and enduring all kinds of migration and upgrade woe you get... some nice eyecandy. Microsoft must be quaking in its well-lined boots.
what would be a good name for a Pepsi sponsored Black Eyed Peas Tour?
I have a 2006 liquid cooled Sony Vaio desktop (was their top of the line model last July) and yet the "Vista Upgrade Advisor" still found a number of hardware and software issues before upgrading. - The Bottom Line - not worth the hassle!
To make matters worse for me, I was going to simply buy Sony's new top of the line desktop but they come with "Blu-Ray" which I want no part of.
Does any manufacturer have a Vista Ultimate Computer with an ATSC tuner for Windows Media Center and perhaps an HD-DVD Drive (but not Blu-Ray)? That's what I'm looking for.
If you can not find exactly what you want, you can just purchase a powerful media center computer and add the tuners in manually. HD-DVD is a cheap addon with the Xbox 360 HD-DVD drive (it can be used on vista without any hacking or special drivers)
Anyone have any experience running Vista on Intel's built in GMA 950? I'm looking into buying a new laptop and wanted to know if it runs decent on it. The rest of the setup will be good, Core 2 duo T5600 and 2GB RAM.
Readyboost and Sideshow are the two Vista features I am REALLY looking forward to. A quick search on Newegg reveals a 1 gb flash drive with readyboost for $15. A gig of ram? $78.99. Of course the flash drive is not as fast, but an extra gig of memory is very useful.
It simply doesn't convince me. The most hype I've seen about vista is Aero. Come on people, XGL has been out for so long and still owns Aero (it isn't an easy install for average consumer though). Open source is the future.
I'll wait until I get a new laptop for Vista. Anyway, what resolution is needed for "premium ready"? I know for sure my current one (1280 x 768) can't handle it. Also, why don't they put that information on tags when you're buying a computer? They should put like "17-inch 1024x768" or something. Or at least enable the system info (which isn't for a lot of them in the Best Buy here)
Anyway, this is a Vista page. Lets not bring apple into this. I would try Mac OS when it becomes available on non-apple hardware. The white stuff looks childish to me, but the OS looks decent.
Im running Vista RC 1 on AMD 2400, 512MB Ram, 10 GB partition, Nvida FX5600.
I get a 2.0 from Vista Advisor but Aero runs fine even though I dont use it
windows vista is just downright disappointing, not that it will prevent me from buying a vista pc in the future. even though i respect apple's effort on leopard because it's an impressive OS, i'm just not a Justin Long.
I just have a question for the open source folks - about when is the future? Been listening to that phrase for over three years and believe it or not open source people are still trying to tell me that "open source is the future". Give me a realistic time frame.