I'm having a hard time seeing any difference between this and the already released FX-12. Specs seem identical, camera body seems identical. I don't see an annoucement for this camera on any of the common photography sites (dpreview, dcresource, etc) Is it the same camera?
"I'd buy one for $199, but I imagine it will retail for more."
The FX-12 can be had sub $200. This camera is fairly small, but it's a bit shy of ultra-compact status, and the LCD is fairly low res (112k pixels)
"I'm a college student looking for a new laptop, but almost all of my media I receive digitally. I'm looking for a laptop, not a netbook, without an optical drive, and budget sensitive. The optical drive will just be a waste of space, when I can have thinner laptop. What's out there?"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I'm having a hard time seeing any difference between this and the already released FX-12. Specs seem identical, camera body seems identical. I don't see an annoucement for this camera on any of the common photography sites (dpreview, dcresource, etc) Is it the same camera?
"I'd buy one for $199, but I imagine it will retail for more."
The FX-12 can be had sub $200. This camera is fairly small, but it's a bit shy of ultra-compact status, and the LCD is fairly low res (112k pixels)
Addendum: looking at the dimensions, it actually could be considered an ultra-compact. (94 x 51 x 24 mm)