SERIOUSLY though... I have an 8gb Nano and I LOVE IT, but this looks like a major step in the wrong direction.
Its not common for Apple's design team to mess up, but this is definitely one example of it. I mean, why go 4:3 in this day and age? Especially when it means making your device wider in a world that can't seem to get anything TOO thin... Well, I've always felt like the nano would make perfect sense if it was just a tiny tiny bit wider than the 2g, equally as thin, and with a WIDESCREEN screen. All of you readers (naturally) agree with me in our utter disappointment with this design, I know.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
SERIOUSLY though... I have an 8gb Nano and I LOVE IT, but this looks like a major step in the wrong direction.
Its not common for Apple's design team to mess up, but this is definitely one example of it. I mean, why go 4:3 in this day and age? Especially when it means making your device wider in a world that can't seem to get anything TOO thin... Well, I've always felt like the nano would make perfect sense if it was just a tiny tiny bit wider than the 2g, equally as thin, and with a WIDESCREEN screen. All of you readers (naturally) agree with me in our utter disappointment with this design, I know.
BOO Apple. VERY BOO.