Now the world will have trouble pickin' which mp3 from Apple will they get .Nano ? Classic ? or Touch .Heck i have been sitting here all day thinking which would be a good choice .Small ,External HD or plain and simple Cool .Decisions decisions tsk tsk
1) The iPod is an MP3 player, not an MP3. 2) The two spaces come after the period, not before. 2) I think I'll wait to see what Creative and other competing companies come out with. The 160 GB iPod is the first iPod to seriously make me consider dropping Creative players, but we'll have to see how the market reacts ... I still rather dislike iTunes, though. I just use Winamp to sync and play music; user-friendly, easy-to-use input plugins, and (using the "windowshade" mode in a Winamp2 style skin) takes up FAR less screen real-estate than iTunes does, not to mention not hijacking my media settings ...
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Now the world will have trouble pickin' which mp3 from Apple will they get .Nano ? Classic ? or Touch .Heck i have been sitting here all day thinking which would be a good choice .Small ,External HD or plain and simple Cool .Decisions decisions tsk tsk
1) The iPod is an MP3 player, not an MP3.
2) The two spaces come after the period, not before.
2) I think I'll wait to see what Creative and other competing companies come out with. The 160 GB iPod is the first iPod to seriously make me consider dropping Creative players, but we'll have to see how the market reacts ... I still rather dislike iTunes, though. I just use Winamp to sync and play music; user-friendly, easy-to-use input plugins, and (using the "windowshade" mode in a Winamp2 style skin) takes up FAR less screen real-estate than iTunes does, not to mention not hijacking my media settings ...