Hybrid robot runs on gasoline
By Nilay Patel 
posted Sep 23rd 2007 10:33AM
posted Sep 23rd 2007 10:33AM
[Via Hack A Day]
posted Sep 23rd 2007 10:33AM
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
omgwtfbbq... steorn is totally pwn'd!11!
I for one, welcome our lawnmower robot overlords...
I think Engadget is confusing robot and RC Car.
Right, I think we all need to get onto burning more fossil fuels, as quickly as possible. The sooner they're all gone, the sooner the Robot uprising can be stopped in their tracks.
Ah, we learn so little from Hollywood. Once they run out of fossil fuels, the robots will just turn to us humans for battery power. :)
How did I know this would have a "fossil fuel" comment in it? Or "I thought we were trying to move away from gasoline"
The reason that it makes sense to build a robot that runs on gasoline is the same reason that cars run on gasoline and probably will continue to do so for the next few years at least. Gasoline and other hydrocarbon fuels offer considerably better energy density than any battery-based technology currently avaliable (although they are getting better). It's also much easier to refuel and preforms better with less expensive and complex equipment than any hydrogen fuel cell based system and can provide more power than something like solar energy could in such a device.
Granted, the internal combustion engine is something that will (hopefully) be replaced by something more sustainable and with comparable practicality and energy production. Batteries have gotten a lot better, but they've pretty much hit the theoretical ceiling of electrochemical storage. Nano-capacitors look very interesting and hydrate-based hydrogen systems have some promise too.
But seriously do we need to bring up the idiocy of badmouthing a gas powered robot from your coal-powered computer? Seriously... it makes sense and I'm really a lot more concerned about power plants, vehicles, industrial processes and wild coal fires in that whole area.
I don't expect the price of fuel to be effected or the world to get significantly hotter because of the robots...
Whooooshhhhh - The the sound of the sarcasm from my original post going straight over your head. :)
I diagree,
the sooner that occurs, the sooner they will turn to renewable energy sources.
Let them build their army, THEN we use up all the fossil fuels.
they won't have enough gas to power themselves to upgrade!
I thought we were trying to move away from gasoline.
I find the steam powered robots more impressive
This is in no way a robot.
This is an RC car with a crude hybrid powertrain.
This robot is demonstrated in an R/C mode, but it may also be autonomous or guided by GPS. The purpose of that video clip was simply a demo under R/C of the engine-alternator under power - that's all.
What does this "robot" do?
If you read the article, the reason why it's not mechanically powered by the engine is because he wanted it bi-directional and theres no transmissions for engines like that. It's still very inefficient and stupid. Not worthy to be posted here if you ask me.
Might give some student or tinkerer or engineer an idea that's more useful, perhaps attach it to a satellite phone when you are a billionaire going around the world alone in your plane.
Or if you need to power something small on the northpole or something, electrically heated socks maybe.
@Wwhat
ya, thats what a generator is. That's all this is too, a battery powered rc car with a generator on it. There's nothing new about this.
Don't you all see?
It's a robot piggyback on, driving that car!
Once it gets roadrage, we're all doomed!!!
That is some beautiful machining work on the base of that thing.
Oh, and almost anyone who says anything about what a robot is or isn't is most likely not involved with robots in any way, shape or form.
Folks who are tend to understand.
What's hilarious is when robots are everywhere, it's the normal people who will own them, not you robot elitist dorks living in basements.
i didn't see a robot..is it controlling that rc car?
Stop calling these wheeled carts 'robots'. Robots have legs or arms.
Beeping is also an acceptable substitute for legs or arms (it's ok R2, I got ya covered.)
unlike batteries, gas offers higher energy concentration, longer run times, and continuous power until it runs out of fuel. Batteries on the other hand tend to have lower overall energy densities, less continual output, and tend to reduce in power as they are discharged.
For heavy duty applications, gas is the way to go.
The drivetrain is electric because electricity offers more torque at lower speeds and is more efficient on startup. it also allows independent control or 2 or more main driving wheels.
So, while this solution is not pretty nor environmentally friendly, it is a very effective and powerful base for great projects to run on, offering long range, high output, and lots of power.
It's 2007 people! They are still building robots that
'Robowars' were building in the late 80's.
Every robot I've seen is just another take on an 1800's animitron, levers, wires.
Where's the artificial muscle powered, DNA brain based organobot?
Here's a tip just grow humans without brains..insta-robot. We used to call them slaves, but now we can de-humanise without guilt...until the revolution.
May I ask how this is considered a robot? It looks like he made his own RC car...
If some of you would read the specifications you would find that it is capable of autonomous mode complete with active sensors feeding a small processor.It can also run on biofuel alcohol.This inventor is way ahead of the game.What are you supposed to propel it with? Cosmic rays from the ether maybe?Give it a rest.
I'm glad there finally integrating American culture into robots.