[resource Posted Nov 2nd 2007 6:30PM]

Installable on Windows boxes!

I'd love to try Leopard but don't want an expensive MacBook.

[paloooz (Unverified) Posted Nov 2nd 2007 7:01PM]

A Windows box could also be a Mac. ;)

[Xtopher Robin (Unverified) Posted Nov 2nd 2007 7:32PM]

If you have an Intel processor, you can. Google OSx8686.

[Xtopher Robin (Unverified) Posted Nov 2nd 2007 7:34PM]

Oops, make that OSx86. My bad!

[aughscreennames Posted Nov 2nd 2007 7:34PM]

http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showforum=85

[Solipsism Posted Nov 2nd 2007 9:00PM]

a windows box could also be a mac.... if you bought a mac. You can install windows on either, but then you need to hack around to get mac os on the other. The inability to install Mac OS on non-Apple hardware is my main problem with it.

[Nathan (Unverified) Posted Nov 2nd 2007 9:43PM]

@Xtopher Robin

i thought for a second you said OSX 8086
i was having terrible flashbacks.

[JT_X (Unverified) Posted Nov 2nd 2007 10:34PM]

Then get the cheap MacBook.

[Scooby Doo (Unverified) Posted Nov 3rd 2007 10:59AM]

Then Apple would have to deal with all the different hardware drivers/issues. It's not going to happen. It's a closed system which is it's strength and it's weakness. Personally, I'd prefer to choose my own hardware.

[RedBull Runner (Unverified) Posted Nov 3rd 2007 3:35AM]

Hey, Writing this from an Osx86 Leopard box with an AMD 64 3400+

Running beatifully. I honestly would only change one thing with leopard... make the stacks nestable, where if I open a stack, then click on a folder, it should open that folder in the current stack, not open it in finder.

[Giroro Posted Nov 20th 2007 6:56PM]

I agree, Mac hard ware is (WAY) overpriced. comparable PC laptops cost half as much