As an avid Mac User and a huge fan of their products. I should be able to safely say without getting hazed too badley: "Who cares. Enough on the MBA...it's a P.O.S. anyways. Why spend $500 more for less performance than the already wonderfully light and portable Macbook."
The whole line-up consists of the $60 Amps in-ears and $100 Tracks on-ear headphones, which both also come in slightly souped-up and pricier HD variations at $100 and $130, respectively.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
As an avid Mac User and a huge fan of their products. I should be able to safely say without getting hazed too badley: "Who cares. Enough on the MBA...it's a P.O.S. anyways. Why spend $500 more for less performance than the already wonderfully light and portable Macbook."
Because it's a UMPC.
There is a market for that you know.
Shut up.
Mike, can I just point out that your "wonderfully light" Macbook is 2 lbs heavier than the MBA? Don't use weight as a selling point.
It's 2 freaking pounds...