Why on earth does Intel even try to make video processors anymore? And why on earth does anyone buy the damned things? We should band together and force all retailers to put a gigantic "Warning: Intel Video Onboard" sign on all devices that lack PCI-E ports to replace them.
Portability requires performance on par with a c1998-1999 TNT2/GeForce 1 video card? An MX 200 or MX 400 still outperforms current offerings from Intel - To market Intel GPUs at all to anyone but the most dull business users is something I simply cannot wrap my head around. Why on earth can't they at least try to keep up? Matrox still exists - buy them out, and they'd have talent enough to at least catch up with the 6-series Nvidia cards. Surely they could manage that much with minimal power usage.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Pro7 @ Feb 15th 2008 6:21AM
Nice one, it would be awesome with a Gefroce 8600M GT.
OneLove @ Feb 15th 2008 12:11PM
yeah, what's with the crappy x3100
YoYoYo @ Feb 18th 2008 7:30PM
Why on earth does Intel even try to make video processors anymore? And why on earth does anyone buy the damned things? We should band together and force all retailers to put a gigantic "Warning: Intel Video Onboard" sign on all devices that lack PCI-E ports to replace them.
Ethyriel @ Feb 15th 2008 7:28PM
To piss off all the jackasses who know nothing about portability and make absurd criticisms of a machine that's not marketed towards them.
YoYoYo @ Feb 18th 2008 7:33PM
Portability requires performance on par with a c1998-1999 TNT2/GeForce 1 video card? An MX 200 or MX 400 still outperforms current offerings from Intel - To market Intel GPUs at all to anyone but the most dull business users is something I simply cannot wrap my head around. Why on earth can't they at least try to keep up? Matrox still exists - buy them out, and they'd have talent enough to at least catch up with the 6-series Nvidia cards. Surely they could manage that much with minimal power usage.