Skip to Content
This might be a dumb question, but is it possible that the CPU score was lower on the Wind due to Vista?
No.
Or possibly yes.
Very well maybe.
There should be speed/watt table, then ATOM would probably come on top, ATOM is *much* slower then Celeron, but is also much less power hungry about ~2 Watts!
I don't think so because PCMark scores tend to be higher on Vista (look at other review, it really is :))
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Akshat @ May 21st 2008 6:00AM
This might be a dumb question, but is it possible that the CPU score was lower on the Wind due to Vista?
gad get @ May 21st 2008 6:25AM
No.
gad get @ May 21st 2008 6:27AM
Or possibly yes.
Mile @ May 21st 2008 7:10AM
Very well maybe.
white_ultras @ May 21st 2008 8:12AM
There should be speed/watt table, then ATOM would probably come on top,
ATOM is *much* slower then Celeron, but is also much less power hungry about ~2 Watts!
MMaster23 @ May 21st 2008 8:37AM
I don't think so because PCMark scores tend to be higher on Vista (look at other review, it really is :))