media centric gpus overheating have alot to do with high end 600$ graphics card. Please post with sense next time. Oh and about the sales of the 280 gtx thier selling just fine which is about the same as the 8800 ultras sold which is decent but slow compared to the other models which nvida knew would happen when they put the huge price tag on it which happens to be lower than the ultras were
You have a release of an early financial statement or something? Where the hell could you possible know the rate at which their 280's are selling when they've been out maybe a month.
I HIGHLY doubt this time around given a mid ranged price competitor that is pretty close to the 280 for half the price. A similar product didn't exist with the 8800 series's release or not even soon there after.
I'm marking this as a win for common sense over some random dude spouting BS on the internet again unless you have something to back all that up.
well let's see. The 8800 ultras cost close to and some times over 700$ and they sold well with the enthusiths (gawd I suck at spelling) and due to the profit that they make on each card they do well concerning the 280 gtx market about other nvidia market detials i know about as muchnas they have told the public. I do know that history repeats itself the 6800 and the high end cards that followed sold decently ornas bout as well as they were expected to.
I don't really care about the actual content of your post, but for god sakes you need to learn how to write correctly! Your spelling is horrendous and punctuation is worse! The LEAST you could go is use Firefox's inline spell checker!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
LC @ Jul 2nd 2008 10:59PM
I'm willing to bet it also has to do with the low yields and sales of the GTX280s.
DefPo3t @ Jul 2nd 2008 11:14PM
media centric gpus overheating have alot to do with high end 600$ graphics card. Please post with sense next time. Oh and about the sales of the 280 gtx thier selling just fine which is about the same as the 8800 ultras sold which is decent but slow compared to the other models which nvida knew would happen when they put the huge price tag on it which happens to be lower than the ultras were
Matt A @ Jul 2nd 2008 11:29PM
@Defpo3t
You have a release of an early financial statement or something? Where the hell could you possible know the rate at which their 280's are selling when they've been out maybe a month.
I HIGHLY doubt this time around given a mid ranged price competitor that is pretty close to the 280 for half the price. A similar product didn't exist with the 8800 series's release or not even soon there after.
I'm marking this as a win for common sense over some random dude spouting BS on the internet again unless you have something to back all that up.
DefPo3t @ Jul 3rd 2008 12:09AM
well let's see. The 8800 ultras cost close to and some times over 700$ and they sold well with the enthusiths (gawd I suck at spelling) and due to the profit that they make on each card they do well concerning the 280 gtx market about other nvidia market detials i know about as muchnas they have told the public. I do know that history repeats itself the 6800 and the high end cards that followed sold decently ornas bout as well as they were expected to.
loosely_coupled @ Jul 3rd 2008 8:20PM
@DefPo3t
I don't really care about the actual content of your post, but for god sakes you need to learn how to write correctly! Your spelling is horrendous and punctuation is worse! The LEAST you could go is use Firefox's inline spell checker!