Apple iPod touch 2G and nano 4G: The Engadget Review

It was just about a year ago that we saw a real ramp-up of an increasing trend with Apple: a dead-on leaked photo of an unannounced product. In August of 2007, we caught a glimpse of a short, fat, and let's be honest... ugly little MP3 player that the rumoratti claimed was the redesigned iPod nano. What was probably more surprising than knowing that somehow Apple had let the leak slip past its all-seeing eye was the fact that the company had actually taken the design in this direction. While one division appeared to be asleep at the wheel, another was cranking on high -- around the same time, Apple released the first generation touch to the world, thus heralding a completely new direction in iPods for the company, and significantly impacting our perception of what a music / video player can and can't (or should and shouldn't) do.
A lot has happened in the past year; Apple trotted out the MacBook Air, launched (with a few stumbles) the enormously successful trifecta of the App Store, iPhone 3G and MobileMe, the company lost (then found) its relationship with NBC, and battled rumors about Steve Jobs' health (as well as his mistakenly reported death). In the midst of this flurry, can the company still pull off a relevant iPod, and does the touch have any more ground to gain?
Hardware
Let's get this out there -- the old nano was gross. Look, it wasn't a bad little player, but there's just something about that squashed, stout design that was a major turn-off. Try as we might to like it, we never got into that shape. It wasn't just looks, either, the device was actually sort of uncomfortable to hold in your hands while getting to the jog-wheel.

That's all been rectified with the new version. Apple has essentially stretched out back towards the original nano form factor, long and lean -- though they've kept that screen resolution (though flipped the screen) and tapered the edges to follow a MacBook Air-like smoothness. And did we mention the colors? Apple has smartly moved away from those drab pastels to nine bright hues, a literal rainbow that should appeal to just about any potential buyer. Beyond the colors, these feel lighter and leaner, have a relocated hold switch (up top) which is easier to get at, and the whole thing generally squeezes into a pocket (without getting lost) better than before.
All in all, it's just like your favorite iPod, but slightly thinner and slightly more handsome. This isn't a quantum leap ahead, but it is certainly a welcome and reasonable step in the right direction.



The touch would appear to have gone on a similar -- if not exact -- diet as the nano, but looks can be deceiving. While the taper is more severe towards the top or bottom of the device, the thickness has actually increased a tiny bit (from 8mm to 8.5mm). You won't notice it when it's in your hand though, thanks to the more curved and palm-friendly design. The touch has certainly been worked over -- the whole package feels tighter and less plasticky, and Apple has mercifully added an external volume rocker as well as a built-in speaker that can be heard, though definitely not seen. Everything feels pulled together more cohesively, and just like the new nano and iPhone 3G, it now complements the company's curvy leanings.
The silver backing (which we questioned the wisdom of in our first touch review) is still very much here, and very much getting smudged like you wouldn't believe. It looks nice from afar, but up close and personal it's smear city -- a side effect of this glossy back which makes the device look dirtier than it actually is. Still, it's a small price to pay, and most people won't mind at all.



The screen on the touch seems to be on par with the recent iPhone 3G versions, though we did notice our model looked slightly, slightly more washed out than our iPhones -- still, it's incredibly clear, crisp, and easy to read.

Software
As with previous updates, the software is what's seeing the most changes. In the nano, Apple has made a substantial shift in direction, moving away from the original interface into a strange no-man's land between the iPhone / touch software and the more basic functions of its iPod line. Weirdly enough, it seems like just the right balance was struck by giving casual users increased functionality without pushing them too deeply into the PIM or PDA waters. Where the update really shines, though, is with the inclusion of Apple's latest parlor trick, the iTunes Genius playlist function (we'll expand on that in a moment), and the use of the player's built in accelerometer (which allows you to shake the device to shuffle songs, and flips it into Cover Flow mode when it's turned on its side). That shake function is more for show than anything (let's be honest, it's easier to click 'next'), though using the accelerometer to get into Cover Flow kind of makes this feel like a skinny iPhone. Additionally, a new menu option activated by a long press of the center button and other thoughtful little features make it easier than ever to navigate your library and play music.


But what about the touch you ask? Well you know that Steve made a big deal of the 2.1 update, and it doesn't disappoint in the new model. The interface is faster, smoother, and generally more pleasurable to use. We'd been annoyed by kinks with the software through the last few updates (as you probably know), but the latest iteration seems to put to bed a number of issues we'd seen. Not a lot has changed in basic functionality from the last version, save for that Genius feature being added, as well as a few small tweaks here and there (like album and artist listed in song view).


Let's talk about that Genius feature. If you've used iTunes 8, you know all about it. The gist is that you can get thoughtfully arranged (though somewhat randomly selected) playlists put together without lifting a finger... er, well, by lifting one finger. Apple has gone to great lengths, they tell us, to build a system that not only bases its selections off of what music goes well together, but your listening habits and the listening habits of those with similar tastes. The feature is present on both the touch and nano, and works with some degree of success. In order to get it started on the touch, we had to copy one of our Mac-created genius playlists to the device, but once it got there, Genius seemed to know what it was doing. On both the touch and nano we had decent results, though it by no means takes the place of a mixtape (or playlist in this day and age) created by an honest-to-goodness human. We're sure they're going to get there, though.
Apple's inclusion of the Nike+ receiver and software on the touch will be a big... uh, plus to runners or walkers, though we think they could have taken it a bit further. It certainly does a good job of basics -- what you've come to expect on an iPod (with maybe a slight bit more flair), but frankly, we were hoping for more. It would be nice to see our runs, and heck, even upload them right from the device. C'mon guys, you put the software on a gadget with a WiFi connection that's capable of high-performance graphics -- why are you holding back? We're hoping there'll be some updates on this in the future; we know we're just an App Store alert away from full functionality for this.


That leads us nicely into our final thought on the touch and App Store combo. We know that the SDK opened a lot of doors for these devices, but Steve's bold proclamation at the 'Let's Rock' event that this is "best portable device for playing games" (as well as Phil Schiller's demo) makes the company's intentions somewhat clear. They're gunning for at least part of the gaming market here, and the new lower price of entry for the touch ($229 for the 8GB) makes it a hard contender to ignore. The early games we've seen certainly hold their own, and we expect big things in the future -- so this will be a space we're watching closely. Additionally, with the ever-increasing selection of all sorts of software (even down to VoIP apps and fairly robust productivity titles), the touch is moving further away from an iPod and getting closer to a mini-computer. Why spend the money on a netbook when you can get almost all of the functionality (plus a lot more entertainment options) for about half the price? That's a question we think a lot of people will be asking come December.
Battery life
We're not going to tell you we put the nano or touch through a litany of tests to suss out battery life. Instead, what we did was use the devices like we normally would -- we took them on road trips, walks, commuting on the train, and just about anywhere we went. We played music while going to sleep, when we woke up, and generally all day long. We watched videos on coffee breaks, late weekend mornings, and while getting our knees crushed on long plane rides. Here's what we found: both devices have amazing battery life. After hours of music and video playback, we kept ending up surprised we hadn't burned these further down. We don't have hard data, but as reasonably aggressive users, we think the batteries go above and beyond their duty. You have to hand it to Apple -- the players get smaller and sleeker, while the battery life keeps going up (well, unless you're on an iPhone 3G).
Wrap up
All in all, Apple has produced two perfect examples of why it runs things in this market right now. These aren't massive jumps in usability, rather the culmination of lots of little threads coming together. If you're in the market for a small player with decent features (especially if you're shopping for friends and family), it's easy to see the nano in the picture. Admittedly, the newest flash Zunes and a few other cheaper units may draw your attention away, but the market being what it is, you'll have to want to get away from iPods to choose another model. The cost is reasonable ($149 for the 8GB, $199 for the 16GB), and the selection of colors and updated software will lure quite a few shoppers in this direction.
The touch is another story altogether. With the lowered prices ($229 for the 8GB, $299 for the 16GB, $399 for the 32GB) and increased feature set, we can't recommend it enough. For some, the capacity won't answer your needs, and for those users the iPod classic or Zune 120GB models will be extremely attractive. For buyers in search of less storage and more functionality, however, there simply isn't another product like this. The App Store has opened a flood of possibilities for the device, and the minor tweaks Apple has made to the unit bring it to right about where it should be. We'll admit that even with the price cuts, the player isn't the cheapest on the market -- but that's not what the touch is about.
So you've got us this time Apple -- it's a win. You'd just better have some new laptops around the bend, or we're going to start to get real impatient.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Greg @ Sep 19th 2008 7:35PM
That yellow is just gross.
Nicotine teeth.
Golden shower.
Dirty earwax.
Ugly yellow.
nickd @ Sep 19th 2008 7:44PM
I believe that's just their camera. But I could be wrong. Does it actually look this dark?
who? @ Sep 19th 2008 7:45PM
No, from what I've seen it is a bright yellow.
water.and.sand @ Sep 19th 2008 7:48PM
I've seen most of the colors in person, and I can say that viewing them on a screen doesn't do them justice. There's something about them in person that just looks gorgeously sleek.
The Dude @ Sep 19th 2008 10:45PM
LOL @ golden shower yellow.
Jeff P. @ Sep 19th 2008 11:04PM
You forgot baby poop.
DM @ Sep 19th 2008 7:36PM
I prefer the tactile feedback of the old iPod clickwheels, otherwise a great product.
Vink @ Sep 20th 2008 3:43AM
But you would be giving up one of the most important specifications people associate with sleek and sexy devices. The thin-ness. An actual click wheel would add at least 50% more thickness to the device. That would make about as much sense as putting a tactile QWERTY on an iPhone. This blog is about the nano and the touch. This would be a more relevant comment on the classic review. That thing is already fat by today's standards and has been pushed into a new demographic. It's no longer for trend setters, it's now just a means of toting all or most of your music along with videos, TV shows, and movies for people who don't carry a laptop.
avester @ Sep 20th 2008 7:20AM
I don't get the whole fad about making everything thin on the cost of usability.
I'd prefer to have something that works easily even though it adds 2mm of thickness.
who? @ Sep 20th 2008 5:56PM
So what's different about the click-wheel on this one? (It looks the same to me...)
Penguin Warlord @ Sep 20th 2008 6:23PM
I'd agree. I upgraded my touch and while I do appreciate the speakers and nike + integration I was extremely disappointed to find out after the fact that apple removed firewire charging from the touch, rendering my iHome useless as well as a couple other accessories.
Dian @ Sep 22nd 2008 5:23PM
avester @ Sep 20th 2008 7:20AM
I don't get the whole fad about making everything thin on the cost of usability.
I'd prefer to have something that works easily even though it adds 2mm of thickness.
I disagree. Maybe I don't get the fad but that functional i dont care how it looks kind of attitude is the downfall or going to be downfall of a lot of companies. People underestimate the cool factor, i mean look at Starbucks, Apple they are generally considered cool (maybe not with geeks yeo) and have "superior quality". I suppose people think they want that works well but the truly successful companies sort of been ahead of the curve. They've come up with things that you didn't know you wanted. I didn't know I wanted a thin ipod and until I saw it. I desired it, it was sexy.
Jeff @ Sep 19th 2008 7:36PM
so?
Alex @ Sep 19th 2008 7:38PM
Uh-huh.
Yes, all other companies = fail!
Bobby @ Sep 19th 2008 7:38PM
Boooooooring ! Same stuff over and over again. This is not evolution. Tiny small improvements. Kind of like next model of Pontiac or Plymouth.
who? @ Sep 19th 2008 7:55PM
As if you wouldn't buy one of those if they had coverflow...
Saul102 @ Sep 19th 2008 9:45PM
Small improvements over time... isn't that what evolution is?
It is evolution. It just isn't a reinvention each time. I just bought the new 2G touch for my wife and it is a joy to use. Now I am trying to find an excuse to buy one for me...
Mike @ Sep 20th 2008 10:05AM
You're aware, I'm sure, that the Plymouth brand was killed off almost a decade ago?
Cow Bell @ Sep 19th 2008 7:40PM
You gotta have that cowbell baby....
who? @ Sep 19th 2008 7:56PM
Was I just spammed? [sigh]
Derek @ Sep 19th 2008 7:41PM
I have to echo your thoughts on the new iPod Touch. I just grabbed one the other day and have been more than impressed by the experience.
who? @ Sep 19th 2008 7:49PM
I know! It's like the iPhone 3G: Thicker than the old one at the thickest point, but less overall volume and very comfortable in your hand. Too bad no good cases are shipping for it yet- just silicone crap.
tumnasgt @ Sep 19th 2008 8:50PM
I bought a DLO case that was made for the 1G touch and it fits perfectly, and because it was clearance, I got 80% off.
who? @ Sep 19th 2008 9:02PM
Yeah, I use an old case too, but they don't fit properly and don't allow you to feel the shape of it, because the old cases are pre-molded to be flat on the back and curve only on the sides.
I can't wait for that hard outside/soft inside case to come out for the new one already, that'll be sweet!!!
MONA @ Sep 19th 2008 11:56PM
I was wondering if you were having an issue with saving a picture. when you receive a pic in your email and then choose the option to save it, it saves fine BUT when you go back and open it up to view the pic in your library, its very blurry....are you having that problem? I had the old touch and the pics were saved as clear as they were received in the email but this new one the saved pictures look horrible. I returned mine and was told it was a software issue.
you may want to test yours to see if you have the same issue and please let me know. maybe I had a bad one, I dont know but I would like to re-purchase one when they fix that issue.
who? @ Sep 20th 2008 11:48AM
MONA- Go to the Macrumors.com forums. Make an account (just for the forum login, it's free, just like Engadget), and they will be your 24/7 support line for all Apple products.
Heshmati4 @ Sep 19th 2008 7:41PM
Oh Clak.......
Muhammed @ Sep 19th 2008 7:43PM
what's an iphone doing in there?
who? @ Sep 19th 2008 7:47PM
Exactly.
/not being serious
Chris Macdonald @ Sep 19th 2008 7:46PM
DFTT
water.and.sand @ Sep 19th 2008 7:46PM
"That shake function is more for show than anything (let's be honest, it's easier to click 'next')"
Of course if you're already listening randomly it's easier to hit next.
I wonder if it occurred to the reviewer to be listening to an album straight-though, decide you don't like a song and just want to hear random, and shake.
luzzio @ Sep 20th 2008 12:19AM
my thoughts exactly
Germ @ Sep 20th 2008 11:57AM
What I am wondering is what would happen when I put this thing and my pocket and start walking...is it going to go crazy? Or, maybe the hold button turns the "shake" off.
---Germ
water.and.sand @ Sep 20th 2008 6:58PM
@ Germ
I don't know, but I lean so strongly towards "yes, the hold button turns shake off" that I'm willing to tell that to customers.
After all, they make an armband for the nano, and I just can't believe that Apple would overlook such a potentially glaring flaw.
TehNomad @ Sep 20th 2008 10:32PM
Why would you have songs you don't like on your iPod? Isn't the big advantage of MP3 players over radio the ability to listen to YOUR songs?
water.and.sand @ Sep 21st 2008 12:13AM
@TehNomad
There are many reasons why I'd have songs I don't like on my iPod.
1. Ever since getting my first iPod (2nd gen, the one I still have), the world of music just opened up to me (i.e. I started pirating freakin' everything). I found myself with a Ton of music I had never heard on my little player.
I don't pirate any more, but even
2. On new albums I buy, there might be a few tracks I dislike.
I also tend not to erase things that I don't like on the first try just in case I may be making a mistake in its beauty. Maybe I don't see what makes it good now. There's a lot of music that I Love that had to grow on me. (Tool, The Mars Volta...)
3. The track doesn't fit the mood I'm in, therefore I don't want to listen to it.
4. It's a song I used to like, but I've since grown tired of its repetitious hooks and I've heard it so much it now disgusts me.
I'm sure you can come up with some reasons you might have music you dislike/'want to skip a track but not delete it' on your iPod too.
Spork @ Sep 19th 2008 7:50PM
So when can i expect a non Apple product review?
msm @ Sep 19th 2008 7:53PM
When you stop being a complete idiot/douchebag and open your eyes up a little.
Nilay Patel @ Sep 19th 2008 8:00PM
Well, we just did quick review of Zune 3.0 this last Tuesday and we've been promoting our upcoming in-depth look at the G1 this coming Tuesday. Plus we should have an Archos 5 review on Monday, if I can get it done over the weekend.
Looking at http://www.engadget.com/tag/review, I see our last review was the Sony VAIO Z, with the Palm Treo Pro and Samsung Omnia before that. In fact, the last Apple product we reviewed was the iPhone 3G, in July.
Like I always say, you see what you want to see.
Derek @ Sep 19th 2008 8:00PM
http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=review
Amazing.
Spork @ Sep 19th 2008 8:02PM
@msm
Wow, my eyes must have been closed. When was the last time Engadget made a review? Oh wait.
Alberto @ Sep 19th 2008 8:21PM
Niley can;t wait to see what you have to share about the G1. The only thing i would love the itouch to have is Bluetooth. It seems to me a feature that should be on it since the beginning.
james @ Sep 19th 2008 10:21PM
Nialy pwnt you.
skant @ Sep 20th 2008 11:37AM
No actually he didn't pwn anyone.
If you count this as a proper review http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/zune-3-0-hands-on/ then this blog is as apple biased as some fanboys want me to believe. I look at gizmodo's multi page review and I actually felt like they're subjective opinion had some basis in logic. Your review, to be honest, was shite. 5 paragraphs only!!!
It really seems like you're equal coverage to all the DAPs. It really does
http://gizmodo.com/5051440/microsoft-zune-30-software-review
who? @ Sep 19th 2008 7:51PM
Click, clak, click, clak.
What the hell is that noise?
dotAaron @ Sep 19th 2008 7:51PM
Can't wait to get me an iPod Touch :D
The App Store was an instant win for me :)
who? @ Sep 19th 2008 7:53PM
If you associate the words 'micro' and 'soft' with being straight and well-endowed, you're in for a big surprise.
CraigJ @ Sep 19th 2008 7:54PM
hey, your mom's calling you, she wants you to turn off the computer and take out the trash/
nerdtalker @ Sep 19th 2008 7:55PM
Oh clearly, of course, you know, including all the ODMs and OEMs that supply and build all "apple" hardware. You know, like Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. (better known as Foxconn) who makes just about everything for everybody. They must suck too, because they're clearly not apple.
Pfft. Clak, you're such an attention whore I think you'll prostitute your mind out to and least your wasted breath to any innane topic merely to get attention.
dotAaron @ Sep 19th 2008 7:57PM
Oh c'mon.
The new iPods have just rolled out the door, its a hot new product you expect them NOT to review it?
Its fair to say both the new zune updates and new iPod's have been getting equal bloggage over the last week :)