T-Mobile G1 impressions: what we love, what we don't

Hardware


HTC's keyboards have been getting increasingly shallow of late, and there's not much feel to this one -- the keys are pretty flat with the surface of the phone, to make way for that sliding screen, and aren't very "clicky" when pressed. Still, it's a large and and well-planned keyboard, and should easily best all but the most practiced iPhone typists. A perk of the hybrid nature of the phone is that you can easily tap out a phone number on the screen without sliding out the keypad.
With a touchscreen to handle most of its functionality, we don't expect to get much use out of the trackball, but it's friendly and usable, and it's kind of nice to have the option. Dedicated call buttons on the face are also welcome. The 3 megapixel camera is nothing special, though it performs well enough in daylight and is able to autofocus on objects at a surprisingly close range.
A major concern is what kind of cellular reception people are going to get. Being a "cloud-based" device, that 3G connection is rather vital for most services, and T-Mobile isn't exactly an old hand at that game. A trouble point here could be T-Mobile's 1GB soft data cap, but we hope that T-Mobile just means that as a stick to deter abuse of the network, and won't be leveled against regular folk. We're also hoping the 350 minutes of 3G talk, and 402 hours of 3G standby are conservative estimates, and not flat-out lies, though the phone's deemphasis on media might save a bit of that juice in regular usage scenarios.
Speaking of media, we appreciate the inclusion of a microSD slot (easily accessed to the right of the keyboard), but the 256MB of built-in memory is a little stifling, even in conjunction with the included 1GB card. The good news is that we're hearing deep down the phone sports microSDHC compatibility, which means the sky's the limit for capacity.
Software
Despite all this focus on the actual HTC device, it's the software that really makes or breaks this thing, especially given the fact that Android boasts plenty of hardware and carrier partners that will have their very own devices to run the OS, many of which we can expect by early next year -- if the G1 isn't your style, you don't have long to wait for an alternative.
Let's not mess around: we really like Android. It's not just what it stands for, it's what it is. It really takes that Google simplicity -- which is often at the expense of aesthetics, depending upon your taste -- and turns it into a rather impressive phone OS.
The basic metaphor of a "drawer" for apps, with favorites being dragged to the "desktop" is fun and convenient, and might stand up to a 50+ app scenario better than the iPhone, though it's really all a matter of taste. The hardware home button bounces you back to the main screen with ease, and the inclusion of a hardware back button means applications can consume the entire screen -- though it can be disorienting at first. The hardware menu button is intuitively placed, and the icon-based menus it spawns are delicious, but sometimes it's hard to tell if we should hit back, tap and hold on the screen, or tap the menu button -- a learning curve that shouldn't be hard for the nerds among us, but might be more difficult to explain to mom.

One major criticism of the iPhone has been its icon-based notification method, supplemented by the sometimes-inconvenient method of pop-up messages. Android elegantly integrates notifications into a "drawer" at the top of the phone, meaning you can pull down the top status bar and see at a glance what's going on in your day, in your email and so forth, without leaving the app you're in. You can even see certain notifications without pulling it down at all, the text of the message will just hit the top white bar of the screen for a few seconds. This is one of our favorite parts of Android, and it's really beautifully implemented.


The browser is more of a mixed bag. WebKit naturally looks great and renders accurately, but the lack of multi-touch makes jumping around the page a tad more laborious, and the actual scrolling seems slow and stuttery. That said, Google has packed in some enhancements (check 'em out in the video up above) that really come in handy. You can tap and hold on images to save them or send them, tap and hold on the address bar to -- get this -- copy the URL, and the browser recognizes addresses and phone numbers, letting you tap them for use in another app like Google Maps or contacts. A lot of that functionality is hidden, however, so it could take a bit of learning, but it's good to have the options.
The "Google Apps" are all predictably good (Google's video on the topic is up above). Google has a universal login for the phone -- you enter it once when you buy it, and never have to worry about it again -- so that's a big win right out of the gate. Google also keeps all the apps synced, with Gmail messages, contacts and Gcal dates all available offline, in addition to Gtalk "presence" all of which will be clutch for the Google-addicted among us. In the apps themselves, the lack of visible options (remember that menu button!) might be a bit jarring at first, but leaves maximum room for those simple text-and-line Google interfaces. We did find the apps to be a bit sluggish at times, especially Gmail, which felt like it was "loading" messages that were already downloaded to the device. The maps app was also a tad choppy in standard view, though Street View is surprisingly smooth.
We elaborated on this elsewhere, but we have high hopes for the Android Marketplace, not because we think the apps will be sexier or more useful than the App Store, but because Google and T-Mobile seem to be very serious about staying "open" and letting apps come as they may. What we hope this means in the concrete is that apps like emulators and alternative mail clients aren't only allowed, they're embraced.
Wrap-up
Overall, we're very optimistic about this phone, and particularly the Android OS and what it represents. What's clear is that it's not for everybody. There's learning curve here -- it's rewarding, and not entirely geeky or pointless -- but it's there, and casual users might feel more comfortable with their Blackberry or iPhone for the time being, while power users might want to stick with more polished and complete operating systems. It's also clear that Google is putting a lot on the shoulders of 3rd party developers to release much-needed apps to the Marketplace. That's a good thing if we end up with killer apps, but it could turn into a sea of mediocrity, and we fear that third parties won't stick to similar design paradigms in designing their applications -- there's enough diversity even in the first party software to give pause. We haven't even gotten into business use here, because, frankly, your business probably isn't based around Google services. We can talk more about that when we get some Exchange to work with. We look forward to getting more time with the phone and testing out T-Mobile's NY 3G coverage -- which could make or break a purchasing decision -- but this is certainly a promising start.
You can find the rest of our T-Mobile G1 launch coverage here.
Update: We were told by T-Mobile reps that an ExtUSB to 3.5mm adapter would be included with the phone to allow for the use of regular earbuds / headphones, but that adapter wouldn't make it into the first shipments due to production constraints.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Jimmy Jones @ Sep 24th 2008 6:23PM
Another device in the mobile cloud..... let the GOOG stock price begin the jump
CraigJ @ Sep 24th 2008 6:32PM
I wish. I bought at 535...
Not in this market.
nerdtalker @ Sep 24th 2008 7:00PM
More like when are we going to finally split the stock. Oh wait, Larry and Sergey just like seeing their stock price be Über high to give them massive e-peen hardness/length/thickness.
Nevermind.
Too bad this is yet another case of the provider screwing up a perfectly good product. 1 GB soft caps on a barely-deployed 3G network? How about pass. Why can't we pick a CDMA carrier people, why?
d00b @ Sep 24th 2008 7:45PM
I think Android's blow-by-blow rundown from Engad and elsewhere are missing the forest for the trees. The thing to ponder isn't how well the pooch can sing, but that it can sing at all. This is Google's first operating system ever, and at least it doesn't BSOD out of the starting gate. Right now, it is already kicking WinMo's ass. As for missing/crappy functionalities, like the multimedia and mail/desktop syncing, this is basically a version 0.7 beta release (and all the first-run buyers are really beta testers), so I'd expect for Goog & devs to fill those holes down the road.
I'd also draw a distinction between the hardware and the OS. Unlike iPhone, where the hardware & software are an integrated package, Android is designed to run on multiple (mobile) platforms, like Windows. Even if you think the G1 is a dog (and personally, I'm not enamored of it myself), it doesn't necessarily reflect on the OS itself, just like Packard Bell isn't a qualification of Windows' quality. As with Win vs Mac, this open vs closed issue has its pluses and minuses. But at least now there is such a dilemma to ponder over.
Flashpoint @ Sep 24th 2008 8:47PM
Besides the fact this thing has a physical keyboard, you haven't said ONE THING that would make me trade my 4GB iPhone for this.
-256MB internal memory, 1GB mi-SD? After the experience I had with miSD on my Nextel i870, I'd steer clear of this thing.
Based on what I see here, I think If I really wanted a keyboard phone that badly, I would skip the touch screen interface altogether and get a sidekick or just keep waiting for the new blackberry.
Martijn @ Sep 24th 2008 11:35PM
I think the real point here is not so much that this is yet another mobile phone OS, but more of a Google Apps Delivery Channel. Knowing Google, I would not be surprised at all to find that most, ifnot all, of your activities are transmitted back to the mothership. After seeing the amount and type of data that Chrome sends back to Google, my love for the beast has rapidly cooled. I wouldn't touch Android with somebody else's account.....
Metkis @ Sep 25th 2008 3:07AM
@doob: To be fair, It is still their finished product that they chose to release without these functionalities and their lack of polish/features wouldn't be held against them if they simply were there. That being said, I actually feel that the Engadget review was a great deal more positive than the information I keep getting at Gizmodo. Time after time I find myself shaking my head at their articles. You have to remember also, that many of the gripes are about the G1 and not Android. The web browser's sluggishness may be a result of the lackluster CPU and such.
Dannief @ Sep 25th 2008 2:41PM
@Metkis I agree. I have been reading Gizmodo's coverage and find that they are unnecessarily negative and nit picky. This article is much better balanced
Dave @ Sep 25th 2008 4:32PM
thank god it's only 299 for existing tmobile customers... I can about terminate my contract and then resign up and be about the exact same money... really gives me no incentive to stay. for $20 more I can quit tmob get a iphone.. and get a phone/data plan that's cheaper.. if this is their idea of "customer retention" then I think they missed the boat..
Baby-G @ Sep 24th 2008 6:23PM
Put it on verizon.....
neodorian @ Sep 24th 2008 6:36PM
Not anytime soon. Verizon and ATT did not join the OHA and have no interest in providing a more open user experience. Why Verizon anyway? They have some of the most expensive data packages available in the country and tend to cripple their smartphones.
Baby-G @ Sep 24th 2008 6:24PM
Put It On Verizon
phanbouy @ Sep 24th 2008 6:27PM
put it on Failizon
futurepastnow @ Sep 24th 2008 6:30PM
Why? So they can lock it down even worse than an iPhone?
matthewmrussell @ Sep 24th 2008 9:33PM
Put phone on head.
Unbiased @ Sep 24th 2008 9:39PM
Dude, phanbouy, you need some serious help. You've posted 70 times today(and there are still a few hours left in the day)!
Here are all of your post times. I guess you got a nice 12 hour sleep last night, huh?
8:59PM
8:53PM
8:43PM
8:42PM
8:37PM
8:35PM
8:32PM
8:27PM
8:23PM
8:18PM
8:17PM
8:14PM
8:13PM
8:08PM
7:56PM
7:49PM
7:29PM
7:24PM
7:10PM
6:55PM
6:53PM
6:50PM
6:37PM
6:36PM
6:34PM
6:33PM
6:29PM
6:27PM
6:27PM
6:25PM
6:23PM
6:19PM
6:15PM
6:11PM
6:10PM
6:08PM
6:06PM
6:04PM
6:03PM
6:02PM
6:00PM
5:58PM
5:52PM
5:50PM
5:49PM
5:49PM
5:48PM
5:46PM
4:58PM
4:56PM
4:39PM
4:35PM
4:33PM
4:29PM
3:56PM
3:55PM
3:53PM
3:53PM
3:51PM
3:50PM
3:45PM
3:44PM
3:43PM
3:42PM
2:31PM
2:29PM
2:28PM
2:15PM
12:37PM
12:20AM
Eddie @ Sep 24th 2008 10:16PM
thank god we have unbiased. Its impossible for us to click on his profile ourselves.
chickenator @ Sep 25th 2008 12:51AM
@ Unbiased,
*yawn*
JJV @ Sep 25th 2008 1:15PM
@unbiased
wow... just wow
I reeeeeeeally dont think you should be the one suggesting help at this point...
anonymouspimp @ Sep 25th 2008 2:35PM
@ Unbiased... OK, we hear you, brother... yeah, nobody likes the guy... yes his number of posts is, well, sad... :(
but at this point i'd rather see his posts and skip over them without reading them (like usual) than have to waste time scrolling down through yours... you are spamming... and kind of stalking him, too.
Nick @ Sep 25th 2008 4:52PM
Unbiased.. Look who's talking.
js14 @ Sep 24th 2008 6:26PM
I only buy Archos... made in france, the greatest technology is from france.
TheGeektoriousBIG @ Sep 24th 2008 6:27PM
I thought it was french fries.
phanbouy @ Sep 24th 2008 6:27PM
totally man, my beret protects my head so much better than the usual ham sandwich
Samurai Jack @ Sep 24th 2008 6:42PM
I was not notified of the Conehead's return to Earth...
enrique @ Sep 24th 2008 7:30PM
french fries are originally from belgium..
youngstunna @ Sep 24th 2008 7:49PM
how? belgium doesnt exist.
Valicore @ Sep 24th 2008 9:02PM
Right, someone's had a little too much absinthe. French fries are probably Belgium, but the French in french fries comes from the fact that french fries are frenched lol, oh, and berets are Basque, not French.
Caleb @ Sep 24th 2008 9:16PM
Coneheads are from France!
stefan @ Sep 25th 2008 5:00AM
but absinthe is from switzerland.
Quix @ Sep 24th 2008 6:29PM
Brown? Really??? Didn't Microsoft prove, via the first gen Zune, just how unpopular with consumers brown is for electronic devices?
At least people will be able to get a killer deal on a brown G1 on Woot.com. Just like the brown Zune.
CraigJ @ Sep 24th 2008 6:34PM
I don't think it was the color that was the issue...
What's wrong with brown? as an added bonus if goes well with orange...
Shunnabunich @ Sep 24th 2008 8:46PM
I dunno...from the photo in the article, it looks like a nicer, more muted shade than the Zune's infamous Turd Brown.
yui @ Sep 24th 2008 10:43PM
Canon, Fuji and Sony do have some cameras in brown. They are all nice.
Allen @ Oct 3rd 2008 4:01PM
I, for one, love my brown Zune, and I plan on getting my G1 in brown.
Heshmati4 @ Sep 24th 2008 6:28PM
I'm VERY excited about the possibilities of Android
Though I'm totally disappointed at the G1.... Come on! No 3.5mm! 1gb 3G capping!
I think I will wait until the next Android device.
thedesolate1 @ Sep 24th 2008 11:40PM
They tried to address those issues. Obviously they are listening to people's concerns unlike certain other carriers. They are going to ship the 2nd batch with adapters and also softening the 1gb cap.
Steveorevo @ Sep 25th 2008 8:22AM
NO VISUAL VOICEMAIL!??
I'm suprised no one has asked or brought this up. Am I still going to have to envy iPhone while I'm listening cycling though too many messages from Mom, 20 saved messages, and 10 new ones before I can get to the one message I want to extract a phone number I keep missing?
phanbouy @ Sep 24th 2008 6:29PM
"There's learning curve here -- it's rewarding, and not entirely geeky or pointless -- but it's there"
what in sam hell does that mean?
BlissX @ Sep 24th 2008 6:40PM
It means you have no reading comprehension.
Kennyb123 @ Sep 24th 2008 6:48PM
"There's learning curve here -- it's rewarding, and not entirely geeky or pointless -- but it's there"
It's referring to using the UI of the phone, and it's referring to understanding what the statement itself means. Clearly, you are below the learning curve, thus not rewarded.
phanbouy @ Sep 24th 2008 6:50PM
wow you two angry dipshits sure like to defend a sentence full of gibberish. i know what a learning curve is, ass-clowns. the question was rhetorical.
Kennyb123 @ Sep 24th 2008 6:54PM
You clearly haven't been around long enough to know that no comment on this site is rhetorical... we all have a right to respond.
Besides, if it was rhetorical, and you didn't want a response, than you should have probably just let the thought pass through your head, instead of taking the time to type a meaningless "rhetorical" post.
I don't resort to name calling... I was told to avoid that during my time in "Ass-Clown College."
Lowest Ranked @ Sep 24th 2008 7:02PM
Kenny, maybe you should check phanbouy's postcount. He's been around, or at least, been commenting more than anyone else on this site.
Ass-clown.
aznofazns @ Sep 24th 2008 7:06PM
Just because he didn't understand the statement (which I agree is somewhat confusing) doesn't mean you assholes have the authority to make personal attacks against his intellect.
phanbouy @ Sep 24th 2008 7:10PM
Well ya got me, Kenny G. Clearly, you're above the fray and should be lauded for your effete tranquility.
Here's a non rhetorical question: explain what a "rewarding and not entirely geeky or pointless variety of a learning curve" is and how it differs from a regular learning curve. Enlighten those of us still in remedial assclown college.
MasterCKO @ Sep 24th 2008 7:16PM
I agree with one part of what Kenny said. Calling a question posted on a public blog with people constantly reading and responding (and with functionality meant to allow and encourage commenting and responding) "rhetorical" when you get answers you don't like is a bit silly. They were pretty jack-assy in response, though (honestly, also kinda funny).
As for the original question, I will list out the assertions made in the statement (as I see them):
1) There is a learning curve.
2) The learning curve is rewarding.
3) (implied) The learning curve is somewhat geeky and pointless.
4) The learning curve is not entirely geeky and pointless. (implied: the features learned are somewhat cool and useful)
5) Once again, there is a learning curve.
Kennyb123 @ Sep 24th 2008 7:24PM
Sure, no problem.
"There's learning curve here -- it's rewarding, and not entirely geeky or pointless -- but it's there"
The learning curve is rewarding once you overcome it, as you can utilize cool features of the user interface.
The learning curve is not entirely geeky - not only geeks would be able to figure out how to utilize these features.
The learning curve is not pointless - once you overcome it, you actually gain extra functionality with the phone.
I didn't say it was the world's best writing, but it does make sense to me. I've gotta go put on my makeup and hop in a bus - we're graduating from ass-clown college tomorrow, and to celebrate, we're going to set a record for "how many clowns can moon traffic at a single time." It'll be a blast!
phanbouy @ Sep 24th 2008 7:24PM
@GrandMasterFlashTKO
no, the reason it's rhetorical isn't that people aren't allowed to reply, it's that it's a way of calling the sentence gibberish, and simply going "dude... you so don't get it, u r teh dumb" is pretty ignorant
MasterCKO @ Sep 24th 2008 7:42PM
I'm not going to get into a definition argument. I'm aware of what you meant. Neither am I defending the responses you got (I found them humorous, but I agree that they were jackass-y). However, everything you write here will be taken at face value by someone. It's naive and silly to retroactively call a plain question ON ENGADGET rhetorical once you realize you've set yourself up for a joke.
If you meant the question to only be read as rhetorically indicating that the sentence was gibberish (and subsequently wouldn't need to be answered), you really should have made it more obvious. The fact that the sentence in question is grammatically and semantically correct led a few people (myself included) to conclude that you actually didn't understand it (I tried to give you a reasoned response, others not so much). Perhaps just stating your opinion would have served your purposes better.