T-Mobile G1 impressions: what we love, what we don't

Hardware


HTC's keyboards have been getting increasingly shallow of late, and there's not much feel to this one -- the keys are pretty flat with the surface of the phone, to make way for that sliding screen, and aren't very "clicky" when pressed. Still, it's a large and and well-planned keyboard, and should easily best all but the most practiced iPhone typists. A perk of the hybrid nature of the phone is that you can easily tap out a phone number on the screen without sliding out the keypad.
With a touchscreen to handle most of its functionality, we don't expect to get much use out of the trackball, but it's friendly and usable, and it's kind of nice to have the option. Dedicated call buttons on the face are also welcome. The 3 megapixel camera is nothing special, though it performs well enough in daylight and is able to autofocus on objects at a surprisingly close range.
A major concern is what kind of cellular reception people are going to get. Being a "cloud-based" device, that 3G connection is rather vital for most services, and T-Mobile isn't exactly an old hand at that game. A trouble point here could be T-Mobile's 1GB soft data cap, but we hope that T-Mobile just means that as a stick to deter abuse of the network, and won't be leveled against regular folk. We're also hoping the 350 minutes of 3G talk, and 402 hours of 3G standby are conservative estimates, and not flat-out lies, though the phone's deemphasis on media might save a bit of that juice in regular usage scenarios.
Speaking of media, we appreciate the inclusion of a microSD slot (easily accessed to the right of the keyboard), but the 256MB of built-in memory is a little stifling, even in conjunction with the included 1GB card. The good news is that we're hearing deep down the phone sports microSDHC compatibility, which means the sky's the limit for capacity.
Software
Despite all this focus on the actual HTC device, it's the software that really makes or breaks this thing, especially given the fact that Android boasts plenty of hardware and carrier partners that will have their very own devices to run the OS, many of which we can expect by early next year -- if the G1 isn't your style, you don't have long to wait for an alternative.
Let's not mess around: we really like Android. It's not just what it stands for, it's what it is. It really takes that Google simplicity -- which is often at the expense of aesthetics, depending upon your taste -- and turns it into a rather impressive phone OS.
The basic metaphor of a "drawer" for apps, with favorites being dragged to the "desktop" is fun and convenient, and might stand up to a 50+ app scenario better than the iPhone, though it's really all a matter of taste. The hardware home button bounces you back to the main screen with ease, and the inclusion of a hardware back button means applications can consume the entire screen -- though it can be disorienting at first. The hardware menu button is intuitively placed, and the icon-based menus it spawns are delicious, but sometimes it's hard to tell if we should hit back, tap and hold on the screen, or tap the menu button -- a learning curve that shouldn't be hard for the nerds among us, but might be more difficult to explain to mom.

One major criticism of the iPhone has been its icon-based notification method, supplemented by the sometimes-inconvenient method of pop-up messages. Android elegantly integrates notifications into a "drawer" at the top of the phone, meaning you can pull down the top status bar and see at a glance what's going on in your day, in your email and so forth, without leaving the app you're in. You can even see certain notifications without pulling it down at all, the text of the message will just hit the top white bar of the screen for a few seconds. This is one of our favorite parts of Android, and it's really beautifully implemented.


The browser is more of a mixed bag. WebKit naturally looks great and renders accurately, but the lack of multi-touch makes jumping around the page a tad more laborious, and the actual scrolling seems slow and stuttery. That said, Google has packed in some enhancements (check 'em out in the video up above) that really come in handy. You can tap and hold on images to save them or send them, tap and hold on the address bar to -- get this -- copy the URL, and the browser recognizes addresses and phone numbers, letting you tap them for use in another app like Google Maps or contacts. A lot of that functionality is hidden, however, so it could take a bit of learning, but it's good to have the options.
The "Google Apps" are all predictably good (Google's video on the topic is up above). Google has a universal login for the phone -- you enter it once when you buy it, and never have to worry about it again -- so that's a big win right out of the gate. Google also keeps all the apps synced, with Gmail messages, contacts and Gcal dates all available offline, in addition to Gtalk "presence" all of which will be clutch for the Google-addicted among us. In the apps themselves, the lack of visible options (remember that menu button!) might be a bit jarring at first, but leaves maximum room for those simple text-and-line Google interfaces. We did find the apps to be a bit sluggish at times, especially Gmail, which felt like it was "loading" messages that were already downloaded to the device. The maps app was also a tad choppy in standard view, though Street View is surprisingly smooth.
We elaborated on this elsewhere, but we have high hopes for the Android Marketplace, not because we think the apps will be sexier or more useful than the App Store, but because Google and T-Mobile seem to be very serious about staying "open" and letting apps come as they may. What we hope this means in the concrete is that apps like emulators and alternative mail clients aren't only allowed, they're embraced.
Wrap-up
Overall, we're very optimistic about this phone, and particularly the Android OS and what it represents. What's clear is that it's not for everybody. There's learning curve here -- it's rewarding, and not entirely geeky or pointless -- but it's there, and casual users might feel more comfortable with their Blackberry or iPhone for the time being, while power users might want to stick with more polished and complete operating systems. It's also clear that Google is putting a lot on the shoulders of 3rd party developers to release much-needed apps to the Marketplace. That's a good thing if we end up with killer apps, but it could turn into a sea of mediocrity, and we fear that third parties won't stick to similar design paradigms in designing their applications -- there's enough diversity even in the first party software to give pause. We haven't even gotten into business use here, because, frankly, your business probably isn't based around Google services. We can talk more about that when we get some Exchange to work with. We look forward to getting more time with the phone and testing out T-Mobile's NY 3G coverage -- which could make or break a purchasing decision -- but this is certainly a promising start.
You can find the rest of our T-Mobile G1 launch coverage here.
Update: We were told by T-Mobile reps that an ExtUSB to 3.5mm adapter would be included with the phone to allow for the use of regular earbuds / headphones, but that adapter wouldn't make it into the first shipments due to production constraints.






















In the first video when the y were setting the downloaded image for a contact, did that app just automatically find people's faces?
agree with pablo. Watch it flop!
In a word, if a mobile phone is bought for the first time, is the android
recommended?
First of all, it's a gadget that seems to envy it.
Honestly in my opinion this phone looks just like an ordinary phone out there, nothing so good about it. Overall there has no hype for it compared to the iPhone 3G. HTC will be lucky even if it sell a million of these phones in a year. Compared to the iPhone, the G1 has a really bad looking interface... I won't ever believe that it actually took Google 3 years to design this operating system...
Visual Voicemail, or am I still going to cycle through dozens of messages to get to the one I want (eating up all my minutes)?
I have had a few HTC phones. There are 3.5mm adapters available all over the place. I even have a spliter so I can charge/transfer data and listen at the same time.
here is a 3.5mm adapter
http://www.boxwave.com/products/stereoconverteradapter/stereo-converter-adapter-at_t-tilt_2906.htm
Here is the 2 in one charging adapter
http://www.wirelesshunt.com/product_info.php?cPath=4_2175_2180&products_id=1460
Really it would be nice to have a 3.5 jack, but you are making a huge fuss out of nothing.
Here is what I don't get. Why do they keep tossing on tiny bits of system memory? Why not make the system memory 1 gig, and allow us to put an SD card in, to expand it. My Tmobile wing was forever running out of system memory, since it needed to store certain items there. For a phone like this, I don't want to have to juggle installs, running in 256 megs. grrrr
What I haven't heard mention of (or maybe I haven't read enough), is, with this phone being "Open" - how hackable is it going to be, That would be paramount on my decision making.
Full disclosure: I have a 3G iPhone and there are things left out of it's capabilities because of security (which I hope they can get around:
Flash support
Texts with mulimedia
Hmmm.
From the perspective of a consumer, the G1 phone isn't amazing. It has a few missing features and it isn't thrilling looking. The user interface might be terrific, but consumers don't buy phones for the UI (and it is not easy to even find reviews of a user interface.)
The fact that it runs Android and you can add new apps, change them, whatever, is probably irrelevant to most consumers. After all, for most consumers a PC is Microsoft Office and a browser (and maybe some games). The fact that you can install umpteen million other apps on it is a non-benefit.
So I don't predict they will sell lots of these guys.
From the developer/industry perspective, Android is cool, but there are a few competitors, one or two perhaps further ahead than Google, but not as well marketed. Android isn't really revolutionary. Developers will sell a few apps, and the really popular ones will get bought out, and over the next few years, will become bloated, buggy, and insecure (i.e., Microsoft will happen to them.)
From Google's point of view, the entire thing makes sense. Android is not meant to take over the world. It is meant to pipe people to Google online services like Gmail. Anything which encourages that is good, including other OS projects, the Apple App store, etc.
Google's mission is to sell ad views. It does everything it can to increase that. It works from web pages up to the consumer. So you get slightly clunky stuff like the G1. Apple's mission is to sell stunning consumer devices. It works from the consumer downwards to the information. So you get the iPhone, and some stumbles in the online services.
Google's strategy would seem to me to have pretty thin margins, but apparently it makes sense to them.
To consider the other side, I compiled a list of all software, hardware and service flaws of G1 and asked the question, "Would Apple have been utterly crucified if the iPhone came out with so many shortcomings?" in:
The Big List: 30 critical issues with Google G1 phone
http://counternotions.com/2008/09/24/g1/
In honesty, the iPhone _was_ crucified, and for a lot of the same problems this has: no A2DP, no HID, no DUN, limited (or no) copy-paste, SIM-lock (and this _is_ unlockable, just locked when you get it).
In the end, though, this will receive less crucifixion because people think they (or someone else who can actually program) can fix those problems -- open source has irrational fanboys too, even if they are slightly more rationally based than those counting on Apple to fix everything. While most if not all of these can be fixed without cooperation from Google or T-mobile, it's unreasonable to expect they necessarily will be fixed soon.
Right now, it's a non-awesome phone.
So I'm inclined to hang loose, even though I'm on T-mobile, and see about switching up later. DUN at least is necessary for me, and A2DP is big, but I'm sure they'll be there... eventually.
solving many of the G1's flaws would result in a higher price, and it wouldn't compete with the iPhone, which is its target. give it multitouch, a better CPU, better integrated storage, that would all push the handset into the price range of the touch pro. right now that doesn't make business sense, as that would caniballize diamond, pro, and HD sales, particularly the Qwerty touch pro.
offering two OS's on a phone would be interesting. having windows vs linux on phones sounds just like the netbook scenario. opinions?
Has anyone addressed why the HTC page shows the phone having built in GPS capabilities, yet T-Mobile doesn't mention this anywhere? Wha's up with that??
does anyone know if you'll be able to purchase music on the G1 from amazon, and then transfer that music later to your itunes library on your laptop?
appreciate it!
By "cloud-based," o you mean a network phone? If there is no 3G service, do the apps not work? Are they web-apps or native apps? Do both native and web apps exist? If so, which are which?
Details man...details!
On a side note, please don't call it a "cloud-based devise." Wikipedia states
It is a style of computing where IT-related capabilities are provided “as a service”[2], allowing users to access technology-enabled services from the Internet ("in the cloud")[3] without knowledge of, expertise with, or control over the technology infrastructure that supports them[4]. According to the IEEE Computer Society "It is a paradigm in which information is permanently stored in servers on the Internet and cached temporarily on clients that include desktops, entertainment centers, table computers, notebooks, wall computers, handhelds, etc."[5]
I don't want a phone that stores everything on the Internet if that info is not available when the 3G tower(s) goes/go down... Why are network computers "crap" but "cloud-based phones" okay? Perhaps everyone else has better connectivity from their ISP... :)
So I just went down to look at it. I've been intrigued for months. Google phone? Full internet? On the cheapest carrier (and as a result the carrier I use)? woo hoo!
Well I finally got to see it in person.
First impression? I was disappointed. When you pick up an iPhone, it's substantial. You feel like you are holding a $200 phone. Maybe it's the metal. Maybe it's the glass. I don't know. You pick up the G1 and you may as well have picked up a toy. it's all plastic. Even the screen seemed plastic.
The phone flips open ala the sidekick to reveal a keyboard. Although slightly better than the sidekick style of opening where you would feel like the screen was just going to fall off, this was not much more impressive. Again, it's more about feel here, but it felt cheap. It was a very quick, jerking motion, with no smoothness to it. The buttons on the keypad, on the outside of the phone, and the rollerball all seemed to work fine, but still had that "I'm going to break before you even leave the store" feel.
The salesman came up to me and began to show me the features of the phone on one that he had in his pocket. Despite the weeks of e-mails I got from T-Mobile warning me to pre-order so I could get one before the Second Coming of Christ, the G1's seemed to be in ample supply, and this salesman was giving me the full court press.
Alright, so on to the features.
Initially slated to release with over 50 apps, it only had about 13. Some highlights included a barcode scanner built into the 3MP camera that would tell you on the fly where you could get a product cheaper. Scanning the G1 box sadly produced no hits, but amazon had a great price on the new Indy DVD. While I saw the usefulness of something like this, I wanted to see the meat and potatoes.
He went on to show me Google Maps, "This comes with something NEW called 'Google Maps'. You may not have heard of it, but soon everyone will be using it. " While I grinned through my teeth, the salesman tried to show me the street view functionality moving the phone around to have the street view move. This seemed a bit jumpy but did work.
It also had features like "Taxi" which upon a press of a single button would find the closest taxi co and call you a cab, and a quick mixology reference to tell you how to make any drink... ho hum.... on to the web .
The web browser loaded very quick, and did show "the REAL internet". The zoom function seemed a little wonky, having to either press magnifying glass icons or using a magnify box that would zoom into a particular area. Since there is no multitouch functionality on the G1 this was as close as you were going to get to an effective iPhone style zoom. It was a bit wonky and not the most responsive, but once you got past the bit of jumpiness of the zoom, the pages loaded easily. Sadly even the salesman had yet to get the hang of the zoom feature yet, giving me reason for pause.
He offered to take my picture and put it on the internet with "your new G1 phone". I said "Thanks but no. I have enough pictures on the internet for now, thanks." and left.
All in all, I know I'm being a little hard on the poor G1. Still, at $179 for a two year contract, or the simply outlandish price of $400 without a contract, I would expect something better than what appears to be a rushed prototype of what could have been a much better manufactured device. I'm sure Android is going to be the mobile operating system of the future. I'm sure there will be more open source apps than you can shake a stick at.
Until they come up with a better device though (Word is several other phones are already in development) I'm hard pressed to pay iPhone prices for a device that just doesn't measure up. Drop the price mark by $100, and I'm in. Heck, make it an even $100 and I'm there. This phone is simply not worth what they are charging.
the only good thing about the g-1 is that you can order it then get billed for it later. it only cost 179.00 which is a fair price. the down side is i still have the old suncom account which is ulimited minutes and text for two phones for 69.00 a month. add other charges it comes to 100.00. two reps from t-mobile told me the phone would work before i brought it. now that i got the phone they now tell me it won't work. i'm willing to pay for the data plan at the cost of 35.00 more but i refuse to pay 200.00 a month for two phones and switch my plan. if t-mobile want to keep thier customers they best get this problem sovled. right now my brand new g-1 sits in my closet because i can't use it unless i switch to thier plan which is way higher than what i'm paying now.
Gosh.. I bought this phone and just found out that no Visual Voicemail.. that kinda sucks.....I found that one of the most appealing features on the iPhone.. oh well..
I absolutely love the G1. However, I wish it came with a 8GB memory card. They should give people and option of a sale price or regular price with 8GB memory card. I guess when I save up for that I can take full advantage of the additional phone features. Or perhaps someone (hint-hint) will offer a much lower sales price on the memory card. After all Christmas is only a month away. My favorite thing so far is the you tube feature. It takes a while to figure out how to navigate, but it is so cool..... well worth the time. It is the best phone I've seen and there are some really nice phones and blackberry's out there. Great job!!! :)