I predict HTC with BT 3.0 specs and BT 3.0 headsets will still sound like your talking to someone on the moon using a cheap AM radio. Why is it free phones have better BT than $500 HTC phones?
Is that why? I've never known why the suck so much just that nearly EVERY HTC model sold in the US had crappy BT - snap, crackle, pop or worse - such as the mogul which took several firmware updates until they got it so you were understandable to your callers. I have the Touch which has one of the better BT stacks.
I think on xda developer they were working on a widcomm stack or something that improved the sound quality but then it wouldn't work with voice command and other apps.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I predict HTC with BT 3.0 specs and BT 3.0 headsets will still sound like your talking to someone on the moon using a cheap AM radio. Why is it free phones have better BT than $500 HTC phones?
Because they use QC Bluetooth chip :)
Is that why? I've never known why the suck so much just that nearly EVERY HTC model sold in the US had crappy BT - snap, crackle, pop or worse - such as the mogul which took several firmware updates until they got it so you were understandable to your callers. I have the Touch which has one of the better BT stacks.
I think on xda developer they were working on a widcomm stack or something that improved the sound quality but then it wouldn't work with voice command and other apps.