Sony OLED Walkman impressions

Design and feel
What can we say? The OLED Walkman (formally known as the NW-X1050 in Japan) looks and feels incredible. The build quality is top notch, and it really hits the sweet spot between being sturdy and not too heavy. There's no mistaking that this is a serious piece of kit when picking it up, and even the buttons are rock solid. We're really digging the size Sony chose here; the 3-inch OLED display is spacious enough, yet the overall player is plenty small to sneak into tight spaces without causing too much fuss. We're also big, big fans of the dark graphite border. Despite appearing somewhat chintzy in the press shots, the look and feel in person really impresses. The texture adds a sense of security / grip when holding it, and it definitely acts as a differentiator from all the other flat-faced PMPs out there.

Naturally, we greatly appreciate the standard 3.5 millimeter headphone jack, but the proprietary Sony connector at the bottom just rubs us the wrong way. Was throwing a mini-USB connector up there too much to ask? As it stands, you'll be forced to carry around a specialized cable (à la Apple's dock-connecting iPod) if you plan on charging it or adding / removing files via a computer. The built-in Noise Canceling switch is a welcome extra, though in our testing, we didn't notice a difference with it on or off. The volume rocker is perfectly placed atop the right side, and the Play / Pause, Skip Forward and Skip Backwards buttons are thoughtfully placed at the top of the unit, providing easy access when it's shoved in your pocket. In atypical fashion, Sony has placed the Hold switch on the rear -- rather than the side or top -- of its OLED Walkman. We can't say we're huge fans of it yet, but we suppose it's something you could adjust to with time. Finally, the single Home button on the bottom of the face makes it dead simple to escape whatever mess you're in and get back to the front screen -- nothing that we haven't seen mastered before, but hey, if it ain't broke...
Display
Without question, the standout feature on this here player is the 3-inch OLED display. Boasting a 432 x 240 resolution, which is a few pixels less than on Cowon's S9 (480 x 272), the panel is nothing short of awe-inspiring. The first time we spotted the home screen, we couldn't help but be taken aback -- colors were dramatic, crisp and downright lovely. It really shines when viewing album art, photos and video, though we can't help but bemoan the fact that Sony has inexplicably crippled the video mode to handle 320 x 240 clips at a maximum in most scenarios. Why, Sony -- why? Moving on, we can say that the actual touch response was nothing short of perfect. Swiping the panel to move from album to album was effortless, and every icon we tested reacted perfectly to even the most gentle touch. So yeah, the OLED panel itself definitely lives up to the hype, but unfortunately we're not so sure a fancy display justifies the steep increase in price versus LCD-based rivals.

Software / user interface
Hardware wise, Sony has generally had a knack for really nailing it, and that's evidenced in the construction of the OLED Walkman. Software -- on the other hand -- hasn't exactly been the firm's strong suit. We're happy to say that the user interface on this device is perfectly suitable, if not enjoyable to use. There's absolutely no lag to speak of when moving between menus, and while we'd appreciate a few customization options, the standard icons certainly get the job done. Unfortunately, the Japanese pre-production model we had wouldn't allow us to hop online or check out YouTube, so we weren't able to check out how well it handled the pressures of the web.

While checking out videos and tunes, we were pleasantly satisfied with the UI. Metadata was laid out well, changing artists / albums / tracks was a cinch, and browsing files was a lesson in simplicity. Even with many aspects in Japanese, we didn't have too much trouble navigating thanks to sensible pictorial cues. We should also remark that loading the player up with media couldn't have been easier. Rather than having to deal with proprietary software (ahem), users can simply drag and drop files from their PC into the appropriate folder when it mounts in Windows Explorer or on the desktop of a Mac (yes, we tried both and had great success).

Usability / sound quality
As for overall usability, Sony's OLED Walkman is leaps and bound more versatile than the litany of alternatives that lack WiFi, an FM tuner and a web browser (in theory, at least). Truth be told, it handles its core duties with class, playing back movie clips and audio files exactly as you'd expect a higher-end PMP to do. Navigation is a breeze, the external buttons are excellent additions and the 33 hours (maximum) of battery life should be more than sufficient for most. As we stated earlier, we weren't able to witness how it handled web content, which is definitely a shame.

One thing that we can't possibly praise highly enough is the audio quality. We tested this player with a range of earbuds -- from the stock ones bundled with an iPod to a set of Westone UM1s -- and we were simply blown away with the dynamics. Hands down, this is the best sounding PMP that we've had the pleasure of using, and sticklers for good sound will definitely be impressed. Regardless of the genre, the OLED Walkman served up crisp, balanced audio. Devout audiophiles will no doubt bang on this unit's inability to handle FLAC, OGG or other lossless formats, but hopefully they'll find solace in the fact that this one does lossy files about as good as one could possibly expect.
Wrap-up
Obviously, it's too early for us to tell if the OLED Walkman is a great value or not. We've yet to come across a definite US price for either the 16GB or 32GB model, and we weren't able to test out every single feature due to the language barrier and pre-production status. If the Japanese price for the smaller of the two proves true (it converts to around $400), it still makes the OLED Walkman nearly twice the price of Cowon's OLED-infused 16GB S9 and a full Benjamin higher than Apple's 16GB iPod touch. We have to believe that the MSRP here in the States will be a bit under $400, but without knowing for sure, it's hard to rank the three. Obviously, those who find value in the App Store won't have a need for this player. The OLED Walkman may do music, movies, radio and the web, but it won't ever track down a nearby taxi, figure out what restaurants are around you or call a friend via Skype via an elegant application. If you're into those type things, Apple's iPod touch still has the market cornered.

Frankly, Sony needs to price this one at or below the going rate for the touch in order to make those in the market think twice about how often they'll actually use applications downloaded from the App Store. Between the S9 and the OLED Walkman, we're giving the early edge to Sony; the software here is far more polished and it actually has WiFi, something the S9 is sorely missing. On a more general level, we're just stoked to see someone nail an OLED-based music player, and we can't help but be giddy that more are hopefully on the way from other manufacturers. The OLED revolution may be stuck in first gear, but this device is a brilliant example of why this technology deserves a slot in today's consumer electronics arena. We'll be waiting on pins and needles to hear Sony's decision on US pricing and availability -- we know it's obvious, but the asking price will definitely make or break this unit's ability to be taken seriously in the all-too-saturated PMP market.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Xentro @ May 5th 2009 2:06PM
Pricing will be the same as the apple ipod touch.
xcrunk @ May 5th 2009 2:30PM
If Sony integrates this device with their PSN store for downloadable movies, they could have something here. That is one stellar looking device.
Amazing that these OLED's are dropping everywhere it seems.
What are the chances that the iPod Touch 3rd gen will have this technology? Too soon?
PowerTorsk @ May 5th 2009 2:38PM
How can you be so sure?
xentro @ May 5th 2009 2:43PM
Because I work for Sony...
And the pricings are already available in Belgium, where the 32 gig's has the same price as the Apple touch
http://www.sony.be/lang/nl/product/nws-x-series/nwz-x1060
prateeko @ May 5th 2009 5:06PM
God I hope so. I want to pick up a 32GB so badly and get back to good sound quality. I love my iPod for ease but I've missed the brilliant (and unmatched by any iPod) sound quality Sony is known for.
I'm not going to fornt, I sometimes look back at my MiniDisc and miss it for the audio fidelity alone.
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 2:09PM
Is it gapless capable? Why is it that every review/impression of a DAP fail to test this basic audio playback?
Attillia @ May 5th 2009 2:47PM
Becuase, sadly, its no longer about the music!
Gnormie @ May 5th 2009 2:10PM
The limit on video resolution is really killing it for me. I used to not mind taking the time to convert videos for my old D2 but now I'm too used to dragging and dropping DVD quality files onto my S9 and them playing without a hitch. However in almost all other aspects Sony has a very strong player on their hands, a worthy contender to the Cowon S9 and Samsung P3 (The iTouch is excluded from this list as these types of players aren't really aiming for the masses, more then enthusiasts and audiophiles who care about sound/video quality).
Carpet @ May 5th 2009 2:56PM
I agreed on the video resolution. If Sony had really ramped this up, this could have been ground-breaking.
I was surprised to see the low resolution. I now have a touch HD and okay the screen is 3.8 rather than 3 inches, but that handles 800 x 480. Although thats not really big enough for watching feature length movies on so maybe Sony didn't see much benefit in it.
It's great to see high quality ipod alternatives, but we all know that unfortunately this won't affect the MP3 player market much as the way I see it, people either choose cheap alternatives (Sansa) or if they have the money, they get an ipod. You can't really argue with the range of docks available.
voodoo @ May 5th 2009 2:59PM
Yeah, those on-paper video capabilities are very poor. I hope they turn out to be a mistake, or maybe they'll upgrade the firmware. If I have to transcode something to play it, usually I don't bother.
Epsilon-Not @ May 5th 2009 2:13PM
I'm seriously looking at this to replace my 8GB first-generation iPod touch... music-wise it seems to blow the touch away, but what I'd really like to see more detail on is the web browser, shame that didn't work on the pre-production unit.
PowerTorsk @ May 5th 2009 2:34PM
I've heard the web borwser sucks. Not sure where, but it's from the crew behind the one on the PSP (Netfront) which BLOWS, sadly.
jakem @ May 5th 2009 2:50PM
Doesn't the PSP use Opera?
Vidikron @ May 5th 2009 3:09PM
@jakem
No, that's the Nintendo DS.
John Doe @ May 5th 2009 3:23PM
Yeah...if it could only have Opera...may be we could have it in some time.
Ultiman @ May 5th 2009 2:13PM
Ace Young? Nice.
Who else you got on there, Ruben Studdard and Constantine?
FreshJulius @ May 5th 2009 2:24PM
Sanjaya Malakar: Collector's Limited Edition
xcrunk @ May 5th 2009 2:40PM
Ace Young. LOL.
I knew he looked familiar. Season 3 loser??? Not sure. Then again, does it really matter?
Darren @ May 5th 2009 3:02PM
Ha, Mr. Young was loaded up there straight from Sony. As them, not me!
jekoln @ May 5th 2009 2:14PM
you say that the ipod touch can do things like find info about a taxi or figuring out what restaurants are around you, ugh, it can't, unless you're around a wi-fi. i have a touch and i'm only able to do it at the very random coffee shop if i'm out and about.
jekoln @ May 5th 2009 2:17PM
unless those apps have the info built in and don't need the internet, i don't know.
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 2:18PM
He refers to the Touch OS being platform, allowing applications, while the Sony is just a standalone unit.
darkmax @ May 5th 2009 2:16PM
gapless capable player?... haven't seen one yet.
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 2:21PM
Gapless was only important when the iPod didn't support it. Now that all iPods except the Shuffle support gapless playback, apparently it's not an important feature anymore.
archie4oz @ May 5th 2009 3:17PM
Being gapless isn't so much a function of the player as it is the codec and container format. E.g. ATRAC has always been gapless (having roots in CD dubbing). MP3 is not, although LAME hacked on (i.e. non-spec) support for doing gapless playback if your MP3 decoder can read the gapless hints that LAME provides. AAC is not gapless, however the MP4 container does support gapless playback, ergo you *can* do gapless playback of AAC as long as it's in an MP4 container.
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 3:31PM
@archie4oz Apple can develop gapless playback for MP3 and AAC. A group of people can develop gapless playback capable firmware on their free time for free (Rockbox). A big electronics company like Sony can't? In 2009? Sad.
Xoyuji @ May 5th 2009 2:17PM
Seems to have the both of best worlds its able to be used in a pocket or anywhere without looking at it and it has a touchscreen.
thyomorb @ May 5th 2009 2:20PM
I'm still not convinced about the faux granite. I hate faux anything. If it's plastic, it's plastic. Put some grooves in it if you want a better grip.
Epsilon-Not @ May 5th 2009 2:22PM
Real granite would be kind of heavy, wouldn't it?
thyomorb @ May 5th 2009 2:26PM
If you're gonna commit, commit.
I do realize they call it graphite, but doesn't it look like a formica countertop with a granite texture?
Xlar @ May 5th 2009 3:38PM
Personally I like it. And it makes the player stand out from the competition.
ilh @ May 5th 2009 4:27PM
I think it would look a lot better without the writing down the side, that really spoils it.
uhgotnegum @ May 5th 2009 2:22PM
You said you're holding a Japanese unit in your hands...that's funny.
On a related note, anyone coming to my 6th birthday party?
TheAngryGamer @ May 5th 2009 2:43PM
I gotta be honest here, the first part of your comment made me kinda chuckle.
The second part was dipped in 24K Win. Well played, sir.
Aaronage @ May 5th 2009 2:29PM
It plays AAC files but not AAC Lossless? Damn, was really considering this :(
KIFF @ May 5th 2009 2:51PM
There is no such thing as AAC lossless.
voodoo @ May 5th 2009 2:34PM
Awesome OLED screen + crappy video support = missed opportunity.
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 2:35PM
For those complaining about lossless support (including the article writer), the Japanese unit support Atrac Advanced Lossless, Sony's lossless version of Atrac. It's proprietary, but it's lossless.
archie4oz @ May 5th 2009 3:13PM
Yeah, but the US models won't support ATRAC...
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 3:34PM
@archie4oz Yes, but this impression is for the Japanese NW model, and the writer said it didn't support playback of lossless format, which is incorrect.
PowerTorsk @ May 5th 2009 2:35PM
I've got my paws down on the Zune HD until further notice.
Using the S9 and lovin its UCI capabilities, btw!
Neil @ May 5th 2009 2:38PM
MTP or MSC?
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 2:49PM
Since the writer said they used it on a Mac, I assume it's UMS compliant.
tony valentine @ May 5th 2009 2:48PM
No gapless playback from Sony, Cowon or Samsung. I don't care about wifi, FM or video for that matter. I like to listen to my mixes uninterrupted as I currently do on my Apple device. I am very surprised that no one has called them out on this.
JohnWesleyHarding @ May 5th 2009 8:42PM
I find it absurd that people complain about gapless playback when they use players with poor sound quality (iPod and Zune). It is very important to have some form of lossless (and I believe that Sony does, it just does not support FLAC), however I would much rather have my music sound good rather than have it lossless. Why would you have all of your tracks (or a decent amount) in FLAC if you do not have a PMP that sounds good. That is like putting Nos on a cheap car.
Loki @ May 6th 2009 1:33PM
So long as the device makes sound that resembles the track it's supposed to be playing, most consumers don't actually care about sound quality.
My friends' music libraries are - for the most part - full of badly tagged MP3s averaging the 128k mark. Mention 'FLAC' or 'lossless' to them, or try to explain why a 320k MP3 will sound better than the 128k equivalent, or how Apple continue to sell them sub-standard rips through iTunes, and they look at you like your head's just fallen off.
Considering a lot of kids rarely use headphones and play music at high (and horribly distorted) volumes through their appalling-quality mobile phone speakers while walking down the street or travelling on public transport, sound quality doesn't make a lot of difference.
I still have to agree though - good sound quality + gapless = perfect. Gapless would be a very nice thing to have.
randome @ May 5th 2009 2:58PM
Can anyone explain why sony has limited the video resolution to 320x240 on a screen that is capable of way more?
For me this is the dealbreaker making me want to wait for the zune HD.
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 3:02PM
Remember, Sony is Sony Pictures too. It was the same thing with the PSP, only capable of 320x240 for non-UMD video. Sony didn't unlock the PSP video res until later.
tobz1000 @ May 5th 2009 3:03PM
On the psp, it was to help promote UMD's... until they officially gave up. On this, I imagine it was more a case of convenience. Not many files are encoded at 432x240.
pika2000 @ May 5th 2009 3:09PM
@tobz1000 Screen res doesn't have to match playback capability. The Cowon A3/O2 doesn't have HD res screen, but they support playback of 720p res videos. More and more video online are available at least in 480p or 420x240 (iPhone/Touch friendly). Having to transcode videos just for 1 device will annoy customers.