Sony OLED Walkman impressions
By Darren Murph 
posted May 5th 2009 1:59PM
posted May 5th 2009 1:59PM
_103x88.jpg)
_103x88.jpg)
_103x88.jpg)
_103x88.jpg)
_103x88.jpg)
Design and feel
What can we say? The OLED Walkman (formally known as the NW-X1050 in Japan) looks and feels incredible. The build quality is top notch, and it really hits the sweet spot between being sturdy and not too heavy. There's no mistaking that this is a serious piece of kit when picking it up, and even the buttons are rock solid. We're really digging the size Sony chose here; the 3-inch OLED display is spacious enough, yet the overall player is plenty small to sneak into tight spaces without causing too much fuss. We're also big, big fans of the dark graphite border. Despite appearing somewhat chintzy in the press shots, the look and feel in person really impresses. The texture adds a sense of security / grip when holding it, and it definitely acts as a differentiator from all the other flat-faced PMPs out there.
Naturally, we greatly appreciate the standard 3.5 millimeter headphone jack, but the proprietary Sony connector at the bottom just rubs us the wrong way. Was throwing a mini-USB connector up there too much to ask? As it stands, you'll be forced to carry around a specialized cable (à la Apple's dock-connecting iPod) if you plan on charging it or adding / removing files via a computer. The built-in Noise Canceling switch is a welcome extra, though in our testing, we didn't notice a difference with it on or off. The volume rocker is perfectly placed atop the right side, and the Play / Pause, Skip Forward and Skip Backwards buttons are thoughtfully placed at the top of the unit, providing easy access when it's shoved in your pocket. In atypical fashion, Sony has placed the Hold switch on the rear -- rather than the side or top -- of its OLED Walkman. We can't say we're huge fans of it yet, but we suppose it's something you could adjust to with time. Finally, the single Home button on the bottom of the face makes it dead simple to escape whatever mess you're in and get back to the front screen -- nothing that we haven't seen mastered before, but hey, if it ain't broke...
Display
Without question, the standout feature on this here player is the 3-inch OLED display. Boasting a 432 x 240 resolution, which is a few pixels less than on Cowon's S9 (480 x 272), the panel is nothing short of awe-inspiring. The first time we spotted the home screen, we couldn't help but be taken aback -- colors were dramatic, crisp and downright lovely. It really shines when viewing album art, photos and video, though we can't help but bemoan the fact that Sony has inexplicably crippled the video mode to handle 320 x 240 clips at a maximum in most scenarios. Why, Sony -- why? Moving on, we can say that the actual touch response was nothing short of perfect. Swiping the panel to move from album to album was effortless, and every icon we tested reacted perfectly to even the most gentle touch. So yeah, the OLED panel itself definitely lives up to the hype, but unfortunately we're not so sure a fancy display justifies the steep increase in price versus LCD-based rivals.
Software / user interface
Hardware wise, Sony has generally had a knack for really nailing it, and that's evidenced in the construction of the OLED Walkman. Software -- on the other hand -- hasn't exactly been the firm's strong suit. We're happy to say that the user interface on this device is perfectly suitable, if not enjoyable to use. There's absolutely no lag to speak of when moving between menus, and while we'd appreciate a few customization options, the standard icons certainly get the job done. Unfortunately, the Japanese pre-production model we had wouldn't allow us to hop online or check out YouTube, so we weren't able to check out how well it handled the pressures of the web.
While checking out videos and tunes, we were pleasantly satisfied with the UI. Metadata was laid out well, changing artists / albums / tracks was a cinch, and browsing files was a lesson in simplicity. Even with many aspects in Japanese, we didn't have too much trouble navigating thanks to sensible pictorial cues. We should also remark that loading the player up with media couldn't have been easier. Rather than having to deal with proprietary software (ahem), users can simply drag and drop files from their PC into the appropriate folder when it mounts in Windows Explorer or on the desktop of a Mac (yes, we tried both and had great success).
Usability / sound quality
As for overall usability, Sony's OLED Walkman is leaps and bound more versatile than the litany of alternatives that lack WiFi, an FM tuner and a web browser (in theory, at least). Truth be told, it handles its core duties with class, playing back movie clips and audio files exactly as you'd expect a higher-end PMP to do. Navigation is a breeze, the external buttons are excellent additions and the 33 hours (maximum) of battery life should be more than sufficient for most. As we stated earlier, we weren't able to witness how it handled web content, which is definitely a shame.
One thing that we can't possibly praise highly enough is the audio quality. We tested this player with a range of earbuds -- from the stock ones bundled with an iPod to a set of Westone UM1s -- and we were simply blown away with the dynamics. Hands down, this is the best sounding PMP that we've had the pleasure of using, and sticklers for good sound will definitely be impressed. Regardless of the genre, the OLED Walkman served up crisp, balanced audio. Devout audiophiles will no doubt bang on this unit's inability to handle FLAC, OGG or other lossless formats, but hopefully they'll find solace in the fact that this one does lossy files about as good as one could possibly expect.
Wrap-up
Obviously, it's too early for us to tell if the OLED Walkman is a great value or not. We've yet to come across a definite US price for either the 16GB or 32GB model, and we weren't able to test out every single feature due to the language barrier and pre-production status. If the Japanese price for the smaller of the two proves true (it converts to around $400), it still makes the OLED Walkman nearly twice the price of Cowon's OLED-infused 16GB S9 and a full Benjamin higher than Apple's 16GB iPod touch. We have to believe that the MSRP here in the States will be a bit under $400, but without knowing for sure, it's hard to rank the three. Obviously, those who find value in the App Store won't have a need for this player. The OLED Walkman may do music, movies, radio and the web, but it won't ever track down a nearby taxi, figure out what restaurants are around you or call a friend via Skype via an elegant application. If you're into those type things, Apple's iPod touch still has the market cornered.
Frankly, Sony needs to price this one at or below the going rate for the touch in order to make those in the market think twice about how often they'll actually use applications downloaded from the App Store. Between the S9 and the OLED Walkman, we're giving the early edge to Sony; the software here is far more polished and it actually has WiFi, something the S9 is sorely missing. On a more general level, we're just stoked to see someone nail an OLED-based music player, and we can't help but be giddy that more are hopefully on the way from other manufacturers. The OLED revolution may be stuck in first gear, but this device is a brilliant example of why this technology deserves a slot in today's consumer electronics arena. We'll be waiting on pins and needles to hear Sony's decision on US pricing and availability -- we know it's obvious, but the asking price will definitely make or break this unit's ability to be taken seriously in the all-too-saturated PMP market.
Pricing will be the same as the apple ipod touch.
If Sony integrates this device with their PSN store for downloadable movies, they could have something here. That is one stellar looking device.
Amazing that these OLED's are dropping everywhere it seems.
What are the chances that the iPod Touch 3rd gen will have this technology? Too soon?
How can you be so sure?
Because I work for Sony...
And the pricings are already available in Belgium, where the 32 gig's has the same price as the Apple touch
http://www.sony.be/lang/nl/product/nws-x-series/nwz-x1060
God I hope so. I want to pick up a 32GB so badly and get back to good sound quality. I love my iPod for ease but I've missed the brilliant (and unmatched by any iPod) sound quality Sony is known for.
I'm not going to fornt, I sometimes look back at my MiniDisc and miss it for the audio fidelity alone.
Is it gapless capable? Why is it that every review/impression of a DAP fail to test this basic audio playback?
Becuase, sadly, its no longer about the music!
The limit on video resolution is really killing it for me. I used to not mind taking the time to convert videos for my old D2 but now I'm too used to dragging and dropping DVD quality files onto my S9 and them playing without a hitch. However in almost all other aspects Sony has a very strong player on their hands, a worthy contender to the Cowon S9 and Samsung P3 (The iTouch is excluded from this list as these types of players aren't really aiming for the masses, more then enthusiasts and audiophiles who care about sound/video quality).
I agreed on the video resolution. If Sony had really ramped this up, this could have been ground-breaking.
I was surprised to see the low resolution. I now have a touch HD and okay the screen is 3.8 rather than 3 inches, but that handles 800 x 480. Although thats not really big enough for watching feature length movies on so maybe Sony didn't see much benefit in it.
It's great to see high quality ipod alternatives, but we all know that unfortunately this won't affect the MP3 player market much as the way I see it, people either choose cheap alternatives (Sansa) or if they have the money, they get an ipod. You can't really argue with the range of docks available.
Yeah, those on-paper video capabilities are very poor. I hope they turn out to be a mistake, or maybe they'll upgrade the firmware. If I have to transcode something to play it, usually I don't bother.
I'm seriously looking at this to replace my 8GB first-generation iPod touch... music-wise it seems to blow the touch away, but what I'd really like to see more detail on is the web browser, shame that didn't work on the pre-production unit.
I've heard the web borwser sucks. Not sure where, but it's from the crew behind the one on the PSP (Netfront) which BLOWS, sadly.
Doesn't the PSP use Opera?
@jakem
No, that's the Nintendo DS.
Yeah...if it could only have Opera...may be we could have it in some time.
Ace Young? Nice.
Who else you got on there, Ruben Studdard and Constantine?
Sanjaya Malakar: Collector's Limited Edition
Ace Young. LOL.
I knew he looked familiar. Season 3 loser??? Not sure. Then again, does it really matter?
Ha, Mr. Young was loaded up there straight from Sony. As them, not me!
you say that the ipod touch can do things like find info about a taxi or figuring out what restaurants are around you, ugh, it can't, unless you're around a wi-fi. i have a touch and i'm only able to do it at the very random coffee shop if i'm out and about.
unless those apps have the info built in and don't need the internet, i don't know.
He refers to the Touch OS being platform, allowing applications, while the Sony is just a standalone unit.
gapless capable player?... haven't seen one yet.
Gapless was only important when the iPod didn't support it. Now that all iPods except the Shuffle support gapless playback, apparently it's not an important feature anymore.
Being gapless isn't so much a function of the player as it is the codec and container format. E.g. ATRAC has always been gapless (having roots in CD dubbing). MP3 is not, although LAME hacked on (i.e. non-spec) support for doing gapless playback if your MP3 decoder can read the gapless hints that LAME provides. AAC is not gapless, however the MP4 container does support gapless playback, ergo you *can* do gapless playback of AAC as long as it's in an MP4 container.
@archie4oz Apple can develop gapless playback for MP3 and AAC. A group of people can develop gapless playback capable firmware on their free time for free (Rockbox). A big electronics company like Sony can't? In 2009? Sad.
Seems to have the both of best worlds its able to be used in a pocket or anywhere without looking at it and it has a touchscreen.
I'm still not convinced about the faux granite. I hate faux anything. If it's plastic, it's plastic. Put some grooves in it if you want a better grip.
Real granite would be kind of heavy, wouldn't it?
If you're gonna commit, commit.
I do realize they call it graphite, but doesn't it look like a formica countertop with a granite texture?
Personally I like it. And it makes the player stand out from the competition.
I think it would look a lot better without the writing down the side, that really spoils it.
You said you're holding a Japanese unit in your hands...that's funny.
On a related note, anyone coming to my 6th birthday party?
I gotta be honest here, the first part of your comment made me kinda chuckle.
The second part was dipped in 24K Win. Well played, sir.
It plays AAC files but not AAC Lossless? Damn, was really considering this :(
There is no such thing as AAC lossless.
Awesome OLED screen + crappy video support = missed opportunity.
For those complaining about lossless support (including the article writer), the Japanese unit support Atrac Advanced Lossless, Sony's lossless version of Atrac. It's proprietary, but it's lossless.
Yeah, but the US models won't support ATRAC...
@archie4oz Yes, but this impression is for the Japanese NW model, and the writer said it didn't support playback of lossless format, which is incorrect.
I've got my paws down on the Zune HD until further notice.
Using the S9 and lovin its UCI capabilities, btw!
MTP or MSC?
Since the writer said they used it on a Mac, I assume it's UMS compliant.
No gapless playback from Sony, Cowon or Samsung. I don't care about wifi, FM or video for that matter. I like to listen to my mixes uninterrupted as I currently do on my Apple device. I am very surprised that no one has called them out on this.
I find it absurd that people complain about gapless playback when they use players with poor sound quality (iPod and Zune). It is very important to have some form of lossless (and I believe that Sony does, it just does not support FLAC), however I would much rather have my music sound good rather than have it lossless. Why would you have all of your tracks (or a decent amount) in FLAC if you do not have a PMP that sounds good. That is like putting Nos on a cheap car.
So long as the device makes sound that resembles the track it's supposed to be playing, most consumers don't actually care about sound quality.
My friends' music libraries are - for the most part - full of badly tagged MP3s averaging the 128k mark. Mention 'FLAC' or 'lossless' to them, or try to explain why a 320k MP3 will sound better than the 128k equivalent, or how Apple continue to sell them sub-standard rips through iTunes, and they look at you like your head's just fallen off.
Considering a lot of kids rarely use headphones and play music at high (and horribly distorted) volumes through their appalling-quality mobile phone speakers while walking down the street or travelling on public transport, sound quality doesn't make a lot of difference.
I still have to agree though - good sound quality + gapless = perfect. Gapless would be a very nice thing to have.
Can anyone explain why sony has limited the video resolution to 320x240 on a screen that is capable of way more?
For me this is the dealbreaker making me want to wait for the zune HD.
Remember, Sony is Sony Pictures too. It was the same thing with the PSP, only capable of 320x240 for non-UMD video. Sony didn't unlock the PSP video res until later.
On the psp, it was to help promote UMD's... until they officially gave up. On this, I imagine it was more a case of convenience. Not many files are encoded at 432x240.
@tobz1000 Screen res doesn't have to match playback capability. The Cowon A3/O2 doesn't have HD res screen, but they support playback of 720p res videos. More and more video online are available at least in 480p or 420x240 (iPhone/Touch friendly). Having to transcode videos just for 1 device will annoy customers.
I find it more odd that 320x240 is 4:3 aspect ratio when the screen is much wider. Maybe the software can compress it correctly so it doesn't stretch pictures but it'll still result in a big loss in quality and OLED displays have a habit of making the source video look rubbish.
yeh thats what i was kind of driving at Gnormie why wiould they make you use a 4:3 aspect ratio and therefore loose loads of space when you watch widescreen even though the screen itself is widescreen. It just seems stupid to watch a widescreen video in a 4:3 box on a widescreen screen
Hell yeah firewind!
The logo looks a lot like the Four-thirds logo with a little added perspective.
My ipod is seriously beat up, I just may replace it with the oled walkman... As much as I enjoy the ipod, the audio fidelity is not where it should be.
wow... when will people learn that simply converting price, especially, from Japan into US dollar is not accurate? Things are almost always more expensive in Japan.
And when will you learn that a ball park figure is better than none? If it's almost always more expensive then you can then figure that the converted price is a maximum which is quite helpful.
The problem is that people take the price as the price in the U.S. As there are people complaining for not supporting AAC lossless when there is no such format. The statement that I made was more to prevent comments saying "it's 400 for 16," "too expensive" when it'll be more like 300 for 16gb and 32gb, which has been said countless times through out different stories regarding this particular product or not.
Such a detailed and praising review of a non-Apple product?
Thanks Darren.
My pleasure.
Hey, the format .ogg is lossy not loss-less, but it is nice to say that it's open sourced! (my favorite part).
i wish it had an sd reader
This is not the one with built-in noise cancelling..isn't it?
Yes, and it will come with a pair of the NC22 earbuds without the noise cancelling part, as it's built-in to the player.
AFAIK, the walkman needs to have some sort of earbuds made for noise cancelling? The NC22 earbuds have a mic built in to the earbud I believe that works with the noise cancelling part to remove outside sounds. This is according to the Sony rep I talked with in their Ginza Tokyo store a week or two ago.
From the Sony Hong Kong site: http://www.sonystyle.com.hk/ss/product/walkman/nwz_x1060_e.jsp
---
Video Formats (Codec)
(other codecs)
Windows Media Video 9
Media file format: ASF
File extension: .wmv
Profile: VC1 simple profile, main profile
Bit rate: Simple: max. 1700 kbps,
Main: max. 5000 kbps
Frame rate: up to 30 fps
Resolution:
Simple: up to 480 x 270,
Main: up to QVGA (320 x 240)
---
It looks like the Walkman will support larger resolutions?
Dear Sony
It's 2009. I had gapless on my tape Walkman and have it on MiniDisc, which - oddly - many people like to bag. What's up?
Dear Sony
It's 2009. I had removable media on my tape Walkman and have it on MiniDisc. Imagine how cool it would be if you stopped selling models with fixed storage on-board for inflated prices and allowed us to pick up some SD in the store, much like tapes? Flash memory also has limited writes, so if something bad happens we could continue using our precious Walkmans with no trouble simply by replacing the storage with a fresh card (much like PSP).
Dear Sony
It's 2009. In 2009 flash media is dirt cheap. Even Fred Flintstone doesn't listen to WAV on his portable to enjoy the benefits of lossless audio. Perhaps you can consider FLAC http://flac.sourceforge.net to bring Walkman into this millennium. Tell your financial people that it won't cost a cent in additional royalties. You may also consider Ogg Vorbis as a superior lossy alternative to MP3 and AAC, too. Also no additional royalties required. You can also tell your financial people that several of your competitors have smelled the coffee, including:
http://www.sansa.com/
Dear Sony
I had removable batteries with my tape Walkman and MiniDisc and have it on my PSP and Sony Ericsson phone. What's up? You know they only get 400-500 charges, at best, before their useful life holding usable charge is over, and you know you never like to mention replacement battery costs (with surgery), so how about some honesty and anti-disposability in 2009? It would be such a shame to see fine electronics tossed all because of a battery that can't hold a charge beyond its useful life. Not only that, but not allow replacements when 'on the road', especially when watching vids on this otherwise fine unit.
Much love,
tekdroid
http://www.sony-asia.com/microsite/walkman/
If you want a removable battery+expandable memory, just get a Sansa E200 series
and then again, make an "open letter" to apple...they've been that way FOREVER.
Baba Booey @ May 5th 2009 6:39PM
...make an "open letter" to apple...they've been that way FOREVER.
----
Agreed, which is why it's disappointing to see Sony be a copy-cat when once they were THE THING in portable audio, driving innovation so far ahead of everyone else (I'm talking 90s here). They are doing just enough for feature-parity it seems. Though it's always nice to see their focus on audio hasn't totally diminished.
Non-removable batteries and storage I'll never understand. Everything from their camcorders to digital cameras to phones have it (with perhaps one or two exceptions). The level of Apple-cloning is surprising (throughout the whole portable audio industry, not just Sony).
While the UMS support is great, it means that this will not likely be compatible with subscription models. I know it's not popular, but I've become addicted to the Zune Pass, and would need a compatible player before I made a switch. Most "Plays for Sure" devices will work with Zune tracks (though you'll need to use WM10 or Rhapsody to transfer files), but I'm holding out to see what the Zune HD has to offer.
omg u press every icons besides the, i assume, internet one! I need to know about its wifi capability!!!
RTFA.
does the thing have a capacitive or resistive touch screen. It looks capacitive
Capacitive.
So what market are they targetting - there couldnt be more than 10people left in the world without some sort of mp3 player, and probably an ipod.
The only way to poach ipod users (myself included) would be if
a) it could take songs from my itunes library.
b) there was a small connector (or extra attachment) that allowed the player to be docked in istations (seeing as any house i ever go to has one, as well as some hotels) and
c) there was promise of a decent itunes esque music management software piece coming down the line (albeit not as important as points a and b).
iTunes is what makes the iPods so great, so I don't think it's a good thing that this player has drag n drop support like an old floppy.
Fanboy alert.
itunes is a POS...
@Wam: Not at all.
Using PMPs the old fashioned way by dragging and dropping files is really not a good idea, and here's why:
The Windows Explorer was never designed for this purpose, which clearly shows in how it handles music files. In Windows Explorer, you will have to manually arrange files in folder, make sure they have the right file names and manually update your PMP whenever your music collection on your PC grows.
With software like iTunes or the like, you can manage your music with ID tags, hence have a lot more information about them without ever worrying about making a fuckload of folders. There is no need to sort your best songs manually in a folder - just rate them five stars and a smart playlist will do it for you. There is no need to do this for most played tracks either. It's all done automatically. It's all about statistics. When did I last listen to this track? Have I listened to it at all? What are my most played tracks of all time? Which tracks do I really hate or have forgotten?
Also, another great feature about iTunes is the built in store where you not only can buy new songs, but also benefit from all the knowledge available in the store. By that I mean what songs other people likes in the same genre and, most importantly, the Genius functionality which automatically makes playlists of songs that sound alike, making it less likely for that fucking Rammstein song to begin playing when you're making love to that sweet realdoll of yours. Also, iTunes can pull down really hi-res album art for all your songs as long as they are tagged correctly. Saves a lot of time.
The iTunes DJ feature is also a nice touch, automatically adding new songs as the ones you've manually added play out. This eliminates embarrasing silence on your party, and also eliminates bitchin' from people tired of the same fucking songs playing all over again like they do with ordinary repeat functions.
Last but certainly not least, all tese statistics are carried over to my PMP. I never have to manually add the latest track of my collection to my iPod. These stats are perhaps even more important when it comes to portable devices with limited storage space. By syncing smart playlists like Most Played, Highest Rated and Recently Added, it's dead easy to always have all your favorite and newest songs, along side with your old-school manual playlists.
If the iPods could learn to _also_ functions as a mass storage device and then sync the added files back to iTunes, making it easy to steal songs from friends, that would be awesome. But I don't think Warner and the other dudes would like that at all.
Hell, I listen to all the music I have. Why'd care how many times I listen to it? If I hate it, I'd have deleted it a long long time ago.
Was it mentioned that Genius needs an internet connection?
To begin with, why make it so complicated to have highest rated or recently added, just dump everything together.
Math and music never went well with each other. Screw statistics, I don't want what I enjoy made complicated. Period.
@azure.
You obviously missed the point by a mile.
If you have lots of music like me, you'll find that grouping everything together doesn't work very well. In that case statistics make things super easy as they do everything for you, as you'd noticed had you actually tried.
Obviously you haven't read the people who would do *anything* for drag-and-drop on the iPhone / iPod, just so they can ditch iTunes for transferring one or two tracks.
Seriously, drag-and-drop rawks.
For the record, I still use iTunes to organise my music library. I just drag playlists into folders on my Walkman, which works fine for me.
@Loki:
Yeah, I know of those people. However, most of them seem to use iTunes merely as a way of transferring songs from their folders to the iPod. They haven't grasped the concept of software like iTunes, Winamp 5 and Windows Media Player. From that POV, I fully understand why they hate iTunes so much - they think it just adds an unneccessary step to their oldschool drag n drop behavior. That's kinda sad because they miss out on a lot of benefits, stated above.
Also as stated above, I too would love to see drag n drop on the iPod, but for a totally different reason. It would be great to be able to add songs using Windows Explorer and then sync them back to iTunes when I come home to my own computer.
Except there do happen to be other applications with which you can tag & manage audio collections, and some of us prefer to do things with small utilities and apps that achieve what we want, and don't have problems keeping things organized ourselves. Windows Explorer's media functions are one of the first things I usually disable, but they do also show many tagging fields if you require that sort of thing. I do appreciate though that Apple finally got around to making 'let me manage my collection myself' the default on new installs btw...
the problem with itunes and ipods... is that they will lock your iPod to one computer. I have had many friends who use iPods and have either lost their computer, or had a problem with a hard drive and end up losing their music collection. When they want to connect their iPods to their computer again, and transfer their music back onto their new computer, it won't let it. With drag and drop players, you don't have that problem.
You can still use iTunes to organize your music, add album art and everything - and then drag it and drop it to transfer to the Sony Walkman. I don't bash iTunes at all - it's a great piece of software, but they put so many limits on what you can do with your player.
btw, they're releasing here in just over a weeks time in the UK. I work in a sony centre here, and I'm super excited to get them in!! can't wait for it.... Played with it during training a few months ago and have been waiting for them ever since. The pricing is already on the Sony Style website here, and it's priced the same as the iPod Touch.
Yeah, I can see how people will have a lot of fun with their touch and their applications - but if you care more about sound quality, I would definitely get this walkman instead. The smaller size seems better for me - because i will mainly use it as a mp3 player, as opposed to a video player.
how scratch resistant is this? (not just the screen, but the body as well)
I got a chance to fiddle with one of these at a store on the East side of Tokyo last week, and I have to agree with engadget's comments. Beautiful screen, possibly the best I've seen on a PMP. And since it was a full retail version I got to check out the other features too. The wifi connected super fast in the store, and I was watching youtube within seconds of finding a video, at a quality that made me almost want to weep - waay better looking that on my iPhone.
The browser, however, was another story. Yeah... it loads pages relatively fast, but it's more like looking at the web on a regular cellphone. It seemed to load pages small, and zooming in and out was a chore, as was scrolling. I have to give it's browser a big fail to be honest, so at the moment I have mixed feelings. It seems to play music and video much better than an iPod, and has a better youtube interface, but no apps + crappy browser = ?
Easy people.......X1000 plays AVC baseline 1.3 profile in 480x270...........I tried on my X1060......Although Sony claims it couldn't, but avc files in 480x270 play smoothly on X1000