This comment system is...specially abled? So I'll just have to reply to myself I suppose. Flickr and CoolIris (!) would make this "the ONE", I agree. Side note:
What I think, more than anything actually, is that manufacturers that have the capacity and the product portfolio to integrate absolutely should. It's quite simple. Make everything work with everything else and people will buy your stuff. Love it or hate it, the seamless/homogenous formula has been a hit with consumers as well as the business side. Bottom line, I suppose, expensive or not, it should just work, and last at least a while. The worst thing a company can do with their products is to have people buy them and "live digitally," only to find out that the next latest and greatest gadget has an entirely new structure or operating environment. This photo frame has great potential, so long as it's further developed and built upon with future generations and isn't abandoned for some new design down the road.
Very good point. I would like to ad that these manufactures need to find out what the consumer really want. Just look at the comments here.
Spyker wants a touchscreen and flickr support. I would Like cooliris support. Capetech would like google calender. No one in the history of blog commenting has ever seen a digital frame and said i would like to stream pandora on this.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This comment system is...specially abled? So I'll just have to reply to myself I suppose. Flickr and CoolIris (!) would make this "the ONE", I agree. Side note:
What I think, more than anything actually, is that manufacturers that have the capacity and the product portfolio to integrate absolutely should. It's quite simple. Make everything work with everything else and people will buy your stuff. Love it or hate it, the seamless/homogenous formula has been a hit with consumers as well as the business side. Bottom line, I suppose, expensive or not, it should just work, and last at least a while. The worst thing a company can do with their products is to have people buy them and "live digitally," only to find out that the next latest and greatest gadget has an entirely new structure or operating environment. This photo frame has great potential, so long as it's further developed and built upon with future generations and isn't abandoned for some new design down the road.
Very good point. I would like to ad that these manufactures need to find out what the consumer really want. Just look at the comments here.
Spyker wants a touchscreen and flickr support. I would Like cooliris support. Capetech would like google calender. No one in the history of blog commenting has ever seen a digital frame and said i would like to stream pandora on this.