NVIDIA halting chipset development after all

It's been about two months since NVIDIA called rumors that it was leaving the chipset business "groundless," so perhaps it's no big shock that PC Magazine is now reporting that the company is putting its nForce chipset line "on hiatus." On hiatus, that is, until the company gets a few sticky legal questions out of the way, including whether or not its four-year deal with Intel covers Core i7 processors. Thus we have the delicate line that NVIDIA walks with Intel: for the time being, the two companies need each other, but they don't have to like each other, and as the latter continues to pursue graphics integration with the CPU, manufacturers are going to be increasingly pushed towards all-Intel solutions. All this leads us to wonder if NVIDIA might decide chipsets in general are more trouble than they're worth, especially considering Intel's general attitude about them -- and whether ION might be the next on the block.
Update: We've just received an email from NVIDIA's Ken Brown that sheds a little light on the matter. It reads, in part: "[B]ecause of Intel's improper claims to customers and the market that we aren't licensed to the new DMI bus and its unfair business tactics, it is effectively impossible for us to market chipsets for future CPUs. So, until we resolve this matter in court next year, we'll postpone further chipset investments for Intel DMI CPUs." Fair enough. Peep it for yourself after the break.
Update: We've just received an email from NVIDIA's Ken Brown that sheds a little light on the matter. It reads, in part: "[B]ecause of Intel's improper claims to customers and the market that we aren't licensed to the new DMI bus and its unfair business tactics, it is effectively impossible for us to market chipsets for future CPUs. So, until we resolve this matter in court next year, we'll postpone further chipset investments for Intel DMI CPUs." Fair enough. Peep it for yourself after the break.
NVIDIA statement on our chipset business
Hi,
We've received a number of inquiries recently about NVIDIA's chipset (MCP) business. We'd like to set the record straight on current and future NVIDIA chipset activity.
On Intel platforms, the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M/ION brands have enjoyed significant sales, as well as critical success. Customers including Apple, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Samsung, Acer, ASUS and others are continuing to incorporate GeForce 9400M and ION products in their current designs. There are many customers that have plans to use ION or GeForce 9400M chipsets for upcoming designs, as well.
On AMD platforms, we continue to sell a higher quantity of chipsets than AMD itself. MCP61-based platforms continue to be extremely well positioned in the entry CPU segments where AMD CPUs are most competitive vs. Intel
We will continue to innovate integrated solutions for Intel's FSB architecture. We firmly believe that this market has a long healthy life ahead. But because of Intel's improper claims to customers and the market that we aren't licensed to the new DMI bus and its unfair business tactics, it is effectively impossible for us to market chipsets for future CPUs. So, until we resolve this matter in court next year, we'll postpone further chipset investments for Intel DMI CPUs.
Despite Intel's actions, we have innovative products that we are excited to introduce to the market in the months ahead. We know these products will bring with them some amazing breakthroughs that will surprise the industry, just as GeForce 9400M and ION have shaken up the industry this year.
We expect our MCP business for both Intel and AMD to be strong well into the future.
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your interest.
Best,
Ken
Ken Brown
PR Manager
NVIDIA Corp.






















I smell a FTC audit.
this is just Intel trying to Slow down Nvidia Making its way to having a true cGPU that would kick intel's Intel Pine Trail Butt..
Man, nvidia's under attack from every direction in the PC market. They should really work on grasping the handheld chipset market.
It is too bad... But the future of computing is in the Cloud, the mobile devices... Laptops and Desktops won't matter much.
The cloud has it's limitations and even over time a true gamer will still reley on his machine.
As will animators, graphic professionals and anyone needing more power than what the cloud provides.
I think cloud computing has some applications where it provides an excellent alternative to the current model; however, the kinks are far from worked out. Even if they are there will still be plenty of uses for which cloud computing is not suited -- anything dealing with proprietary information, government offices and medical records come to mind.
Of course, I'm feeding the troll here. Silly of me.
No, that's bullshit. The internet is already under really heavy load.
block as in...chopping block? or new kid on the?
Intel is just trying to squash NVIDIA before NVIDIA gets fully engaged in something that impacts the CPU business. Intel controls a majority of the PC chipset architecture market, so if they can orchestrate an architecture change that makes separate GPUs obsolete, NVIDIA loses. Intel also has to worry about what AMD/ATI combo might come up with.
Thats all we need, loss of competition and choice.
Yay Intel.
RIP nVidia (in 5-10 years)
sounds like we got the makings of a monopoly on our hands
Wow, I just read this http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/10/06/nvidia-kills-gtx285-gtx275-gtx260-abandons-mid-and-high-end-market/ yesterday do any of you believe it to be true? Hope not.
According to nVidia rep, definitely not true -- http://hardocp.com/news/2009/10/07/nvidia_abandons_market6363636363
In an Intel-only world, we all lose.
I guess we wouldn't be complaining as heavily if we weren't always saddled with their poorly performing graphics coprocessors and things. Way to push back development by years. -.-
Ion was the first real breath of life as AMD's portable chipsets are just too power hungry. I had one of those DV2s and took it back because it was too slow and too hot (granted, before they released the dual core cpu).
Along comes real competition and all Intel can think of is to panic and strongarm them out of the business. That sounds like a monopoly to me, since we almost have little choice but to use X86 systems.
Of course, the frightening thing to Intel is that if CUDA keeps evolving it might eclipse the whole X86 processor. Might be a better strategy for NVidia.
I wonder how long it will take the EU and other powerful agencies to force Intel to license x86-related patents to competitors once Intel starts to push integrated CPU/GPU/Chipset that more or less completely lock out competitors and create a near-monopoly...
Original source of this PCMag story here: http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=791
*Cough Cough* You're welcome for the tip off, Engadget.
-Chris M.
Don't. Kill. Ion.
That is all.
Just don't buy Atom.
I cant believe Intel is not being investigated for muscling their way into the graphics chipset business on the back of their CPUs. I hate Intel for what they have done to the graphic chipset business. Their idea of a graphic chipset does not even include smooth display of compressed 1080p content. If they win out we will see upgrades to chipsets only once every 5-10 years which is far too slow IMHO.
I have a barebone PC (the Funtwist Fiono 330) that spots a dual core Intel Atom 330 CPU, 2 GB RAM, 350 GB HD, and Nvidia's ION for graphics and Nvidia's chipset. It's a great PC for watching movies (includes HDMI and DVI output, HD playback) and mid-range gaming (don't expect to play Crysis, but for me it's Ok). It has some trouble with Aero, but that is one feature I don't miss that bad. I have high hopes on the ION platform, I belive to be the right choice for Nettops, Netbooks, Smartphones, Tablets and alike.
Good Riddance
If not for the nforce chipset (which at the time I bought it I knew nothing about) this WOULD still be a decent laptop 2 years after I bought it.
But alas, one new motherboard and one new fan assembly from overheating to hell later, I'd never get an nvidia chipset again.
Somehow I'm hoping this turn of events may allow AMD to slip back into a state of being relevant, since they seem to have finally finished up digesting ATI, now they can actually work having both under one roof to their advantage instead of having it beat them in the wallet.
+1
Nvidia products run hot and prone to failure.
Hello, is that Bollinger?
AMD here. How many truckloads can you deliver?
Kill ION? NOOOOOooooooooooOOOOOooooooo! It's the best thing for the ultra-light market since... the Atom, I guess.
Good riddance... Nvidia chipsets are lacking compared to Intel's anyway. If you really want SLI, just get X58 and i7.
And have no GPU? What?
So is this for desktop Intel chipsets, or does this include mobile/low power chipsets as well?
If nVidia wasn't so terrified of releasing hardware documentation, Tegra could have given them a chance to escape this fate.
Well, *shrug*, sucks to be you.
nVidia is not getting out of the chipset market.
They are halting production SPECIFICALLY on chipsets that work with newer intel CPUs because of licensing issues.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nvidia-halts-certain-chipsets-production-wsj-2009-10-08
Tegra is not going anywhere. ION is a bit of a ? since it is not clear (to me) whether the licensing issue is strictly with i7 or i5 chips or also with ATOM chips. There is some talk of ION working with VIA chips..... so that could breathe life into that product line.
The last good nforce chipset was 5 years ago with the nforce2. Since then it has been garbage release followed by garbage release, especially the 680i which doesn't even adhere to sata II spec.
So I guess this means they haven't solved the halting problem.
Hard to feel sorry for NVIDIA here what with how they conduct business themselves. I say it's good Intel is doing this to NVIDIA, maybe they'll smack some of the arrogance and greed out of them.
So really Engadget, I get your need for shock value tabloid-esk headlines but Nvidia is NOT leaving the chipset market, it is just not developing chipsets for future Intel CPUs.
You can still buy NForce chipsets for AMD and VIA.
no matter who wins, its still running Intel cpu's lol. so who's the REAL winner here?
So what is Apple going to do in the future ? Back to Intel intergrated ? YUK!
There is a reason why Intel was fined $500 million dollars in Europe for oppressing their competitors.
I know it won't make much of a difference, but I am going to stay away from Intel based computers for a while.
And when Nvidia dies, I will truly be sad... the lack of a major innovative competitor in the already oligopoly market will hurt us all.
Imagine a world where only GM and Ford sold cars... sigh.