Gateway intros 15.6 and 11.6-inch EC Series laptops: EC58, EC54 and EC14
It's quite possible that you've missed the memo, but Microsoft's next major operating system launches this week. Along with pretty much every other PC maker on the planet, Gateway is also announcing new laptops that hum along on Windows 7. Starting things off is the 11.6-inch EC14, which gets going at $549.99 and includes a 1.3GHz Pentium Dual Core SU1400 CPU, 1,366 x 768 resolution LED-backlit panel, Intel's GMA 4500MHD graphics, 4GB of DDR2 RAM, a built-in webcam and multicard reader, 320GB HDD, WiFi, gigabit Ethernet, a trio of USB 2.0 sockets, HDMI output, multi-gesture trackpad and a battery good for around "six to eight hours" of life. The EC58 and EC54 models are 15.6-inchers, with a base model starting at $649.99 and featuring most of the same specs in a larger enclosure. Naturally, the gang will ship on October 22nd, complete with bundles of "Wow!" in tow. Er, wait.























1.3GHz Pentium Dual Core?
CULV cpu
Im actually tempted by this laptop, is hte CULV better than the atom?
Is gateway still teh suck?
A CULV dual core is about 3 times faster than a 1.6ghz Atom.
The dill 11z has a BTO option for this very same processor. They weigh in at similar price points configured. I just bought this 11z a few days ago.. shipping Nov 2.
When I go through these specs, the first thing I look for is the screen size, but then everything is a blur until I get to the GPU part. And when I see anything intergrated GPU, I don't bother to read the rest of the spec.
That's just me.
Agreed...
SP
Outside of 3D gaming, the 4500MHD is perfectly usable for video, including HD (way better than the 450/500 that come with most Atom based netbooks).
Just don't plan on playing L4D on this thing (unless you do 800x600 with all graphic setting on LOW). You might get above 30FPS at some points, but I'd guess the average would be around 20-25FPS, with dips to the low teens.
Agreed. I'm not asking for amazing gaming performance (I have my desktop for that) but I can't stand the integrated offerings. And isn't the Nvidia 9400 rated at the same wattage as the Intel 4500? I don't see why its not more widely used.
Dont waste your cash on gateway, i recommend lenovo(thinkpad line up), hp, dell, and acer.
U know Acer bought Gateway 2 years ago, right?
isnt that Asus???
sorry, my bad, it was Acer, always confused between these Taiwanese brands
This laptop(11.6inch one) is basically a 1810TZ shuved in a gateway shell, since Acer owns Gateway now.
These are rebranded Acer models, Acer is offering these exact same machines just in a different design and branding.
But the Timelines can often be hard to find, especially the dual core models.
I think there's a typo, The processor should be SU4100 and not SU1400
http://www.intel.com/consumer/learn/ultra-thin.htm
Hopefully someone will comment on the SU4100 found in this laptop, and the SU7300 found in the cousin to the Gateway, the Acer 1810TZ.
The 7300 has an extra meg of cache, which to me seems pretty useless since I think the 4100 has more than enough cache already.
Even the SU3500 at 1.4GHz is better than an Atom at 1.6Ghz.
http://www.rgbfilter.com/?p=1923
As for the graphics performance, the 4500MHD is actually very competent at playing back HD video even with the SU3500 (running Vista Home Premium), so a faster CPU and Windows 7 should be an improvement. Still, it's no ION for gaming, and even ION isn't THAT great. If you want a cheap gaming netbook/small laptop, it'll have to wait for ION2.
are there any notebooks with CULV and 9400M? This would be a winning combination for me.
Not the 9400M (at least, not that I know of), but ASUS has the UL80VT which has the NVIDIA 210m and HP has the dm3t which you could upgrade to an NVIDIA G105M, both of which should be better than the 9400M
Don't buy Acer brands! They are unethical companies!
Is there a notebook with CULV and 9400M? That would be a winning combination for me.
Stay far away from Acer/Gateway (they're the same company, after a recent buyout). The quality of their components and just overall build quality, stink.
If you want your laptop to stop working in a year, go ahead and buy a Gateway or Acer. If you want a PC that works, buy a Sony Vaio, a Lenovo, Asus or Toshiba.
Dell and HP are crap too; they've both let their quality control fall off a cliff during the last couple of years.
This model seems to lack bluetooth and loses 1 GB ram compared to the identical Acer
Not the 9400M (at least, not that I know of), but ASUS has the UL80VT which has the NVIDIA 210m and HP has the dm3t which you could upgrade to an NVIDIA G105M, both of which should be better than the 9400M