Inevitable. The MBP can't stay that far behind its PC brethren. Too bad GeekBench doesn't tell you the screen resolution. If the 15" is still 1440x900, its an instant failure.
IPS does come in higher resolution panels, you know.
And also, what is going to be the graphics processor? Thats probably the most important question. If Apple has not figured out instant graphics card switching in OSX, its over for the MBP. Unless, they already have.
That said, have you ever seen a 17" 1680x1050 pixel screen? Icons are so small you need a magnifying glass, and your telling me you want that on a 15" display to make the problem worse?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Inevitable. The MBP can't stay that far behind its PC brethren. Too bad GeekBench doesn't tell you the screen resolution. If the 15" is still 1440x900, its an instant failure.
IPS does come in higher resolution panels, you know.
And also, what is going to be the graphics processor? Thats probably the most important question. If Apple has not figured out instant graphics card switching in OSX, its over for the MBP. Unless, they already have.
@Ruben
That said, have you ever seen a 17" 1680x1050 pixel screen? Icons are so small you need a magnifying glass, and your telling me you want that on a 15" display to make the problem worse?
@edude05: I have a 15" 1680x1050. Apparently, my eyes are pretty decent as I have no issue reading the screen, even from some distance away.