Now I resent Nvidea. They act as though its ION technology that made the netbook faster... their comparison is to taut Ion, by comparing it to an integrated GPU, INSTEAD of comparing discrete vs. discrete.. They're showing off IE9 abilities... which is great for IE, but that Nvidea suggest its technology that they ALONE can tap in to is as misleading as their naming convention. I officially trust them as much as I trust Apple's marketing.
While its tablet world topping pixel density, Tegra 2 silicon, and fresh to death OS certainly sound awesome, we had to get our grubby mitts on one to see if it's as good as its spec sheet would have us believe.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Now I resent Nvidea. They act as though its ION technology that made the netbook faster... their comparison is to taut Ion, by comparing it to an integrated GPU, INSTEAD of comparing discrete vs. discrete.. They're showing off IE9 abilities... which is great for IE, but that Nvidea suggest its technology that they ALONE can tap in to is as misleading as their naming convention. I officially trust them as much as I trust Apple's marketing.
@TrumanHW I was thinking the same thing.
It's like the point they're trying to make is that GPU acceleration works better on *book with a dedicated GPU then a *book without one.
Like no s***
@TrumanHW
try out the rest and see how they run in chrome
http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/