HP bought Palm after a five-company bidding war
Palm and HP seem like the happiest of corporate couples right now, but theirs was a heated courtship: according to Palm's latest statement to shareholders, a total of 16 companies were contacted about a deal, and HP was the winner of a month-long bidding war that involved serious offers from five companies -- a bidding war that involved Jon Rubinstein personally warning HP that it had to "significantly and immediately" increase its offer to remain in the game. What's more, HP's winning bid came in at just 20 cents a share more than its primary rival. Yeah, it's juicy -- read on for the full blow-by-blow.
[Thanks, Herman]
- Palm recognized that it was in trouble in early February, a few weeks before it posted its disappointing quarterly results, and on February 17 the company organized a committee headed by CEO Jon Rubinstein to investigate its options -- everything from licensing webOS to selling the company was on the table.
- From February 25 to April 1, Palm's management and consultants talked to a total of 16 companies about doing a deal. Five companies including HP ultimately got to the point of making offers, but only HP is publicly named in the filing -- the other suitors are referred to as Companies A, B, C, and D. Palm was most interested in HP and Companies A and B, while C and D initially only wanted to acquire Palm's patents. It's not clear when D dropped out.
- Palm's board of directors decided that selling the company was the best option in early March. The board thought about selling patents and / or licensing webOS, but decided against it because licensing would dilute the value of Palm's IP and fail to address long-term problems like scale and resources, and management was told to tell potential buyers that they should focus on an "outright acquisition." If you're keeping track, that's the exact opposite of what Jon Rubinstein was saying on April 22.
- HP made its first offer on April 13, for $4.75 per share or about a billion dollars, and requested a 30-day period of exclusive negotations. Company A followed up on April 15 with an offer of $600 million in cash, and Company B proposed a stock-for-stock deal that would take longer than the other deals.
- After receiving the offers from A and B, Palm told HP that it wouldn't give it an exclusivity period unless it improved its offer, and HP declined. At the same time, Palm decided that neither A nor B's proposal were of any value to its shareholders, and told both companies that they weren't competitive. A and B then dropped out of the game.
- On April 18 Company C offered between $6 and $7 per share with a proposed transaction to take place within 14 days, and on April 19 Palm sent both HP and Company C draft merger agreements.
- Palm and HP senior management held meetings on April 20 and 21, resulting in HP upping its offer to $5 per share on April 22. Later that day, Company C dropped its offer to $5.50 and sent Palm a revised merger agreement that contained several worrisome provisions, including a longer, riskier transaction timeline and a $60 million penalty if the deal didn't go through. Palm and Company C engaged in "extensive negotiations" from the 23rd to the 25th, but never managed to work out a compromise.
- While that was going on, on April 24th Jon Rubinstein and his advisors directly told HP that its offer wasn't competitive and that it had to "significantly and immediately" improve its offer in order to remain in the game. HP responded by raising its offer to $5.70 per share (the winning bid) later that day, and Jon Rubinstein told Company C that he had a better offer on April 25th.
- Company C told Palm it wasn't raising its acquisition offer, but offered to buy patents and take a nonexclusive license to webOS for $800 million. The board considered that proposal on the same day and declined.
- From that point on it was all HP -- the two companies negotiated from April 24 to April 28, when the merger was approved by Palm's outside accountants at Goldman Sachs and announced to the world.
[Thanks, Herman]























It was Apple
@ashleythehottiest
or Microsoft
@commenter7 either way we can expect some amazing things from HPalm in the near future
@ashleythehottiest Read this slowly: Apple definitely did not offer to buy Palm, I'm not saying its right! but they are way too proud to do such a thing.
@ashleythehottiest
iPre? No.
This is excellent news.
@ashleythehottiest A is for Apple. And $600M in cash is a drop in the bucket with their VAST RESERVES of greenery.
Why would Apple buy Palm OS? At best, they were one of the companies interested in buying the patents, nothing else.
That and the engineering team...
@ashleythehottiest
or Google.
Actually, I hope Google poach Palm's design team. They could really do with them on Android, and I don't have high hopes for the WebOS platform becoming mainstream under HP.
@Techno1q no company would be too proud to get their hands on that patent portfolio and if they are, well then it will be fun to watch their huge downfall... wait i hope youre right
@SteveyAyo I doubt you're right. When it comes to smartphones and PDA's, Palm was one of the first companies to patent the tech with their Palm Pilots and Trēo's. Palm is widely regarded as being the patent king of the smartphone arena. I'm sure a lot of companies would like to hold those patents
@ashleythehottiest
It was probably, Nokia, HTC, Motorola and someone else? not sure who though
@mj1234 lol thats exactly what i said, no one would be so proud as to pass on the opportunity to buy Palm's patent portfolio
@ashleythehottiest
It was Waveface.
(FacePalm)
@ashleythehottiest
Company C is possibly HTC. They didn't need anything but the patents and the nonexclusive right to WebOS, in order for them to produce phones on another platform AND keep their business going against Apple's lawsuit threat.
@ashleythehottiest
IS ENGADGET GONNA STOP USING THE OLD HP LOGO FOR THIS CRAPPY PHOTOSHOP JOB? ITS STUPID...
A++++++++++++ Would by Again!
-hp
@ashleythehottiest
Apple Bintel miCrosoft Doogle... Only companies who would want palmOS DEAD and would just like the patents and also got cash to burn.
Other possible companies out of 16 would be:
Nokia samsung lenovo acer Dell htc lg sony blackberry errr meizu??? Who knows
@ashleythehottiest
Well, except for the unknown "others", it is a safe bet to say HTC, Lenovo, Dell, HP, and that other Chinese company that starts with H was involved...I wouldn't bet too much on Microsoft, Apple, or Google...The gene pool, the culture of those three giants are far too different from Palm's...Although any of those three could have been the companies looking to acquire Palm for its patents...
@ashleythehottiest
Apple was Company D... Decided that it wasn't worth it to buy the patents early on...
@casik
you're pretty dumb, you realize that right? they have enough patents, why would they need more. they claim to have over 100 for the iphone
@ashleythehottiest No, Apple or Microsoft would have wanted an exclusive on the WebOS. I say HTC.
@JeanMichel Decombe Precisely! Which is why Apple only offered $600M...
@JeanMichel Decombe
You buy the company, you can integrate their PR group and their patents to your own.
@account5 probably because Palm has way more patents than Apple and boosting your own patent portfolio with something as amazing as palms would be a smart move for any phone company? dont let your fanboyism keep you from seeing the value in things apple didnt create...
@SteveyAyo
overpriced when u already have patents.
@ashleythehottiest
WHY is engadget using the old HP logo? its the dumbest thing ive ever seen
@ashleythehottiest
?!?!?!?!? LMAO
@Doctor Kwame Nkrumah theyve been making phones for 10+ years and their patent portfolio was valued at 1.4 BILLION dollars. Do you know anything at all or do you just get on your knees for steve jobs all day and pretend facts arent real... youre so pathetic
@JeanMichel Decombe Apple would buy Palm to own its patents, pay attention. They don't need WebOS, but Palm is kind of a packaged deal.
@ashleythehottiest yeah.. well I still believe this acquisition by HP is a lucrative deal. The combination of technology here is overwhelming indeed. Opinions. http://j.mp/hp-palm-duality
@Doctor Kwame Nkrumah
Learn to spell because I don't know anyone with an azz! How stupid would you sound saying "that girls got a nice azz!"
@account5 lol! ugly orange all over yuck!
@Doctor Kwame Nkrumah
"show us all these so called super patents they own"
A 3 second search on Engadget reveals an article they wrote about this exact topic, concluding that Palm's patents would indeed crush the iPhone, whereas Apple's patents would only take away some minor cosmetic niceties from WebOS.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/
So since you clearly know nothing about the issue, stfu.
@ashleythehottiest I'm betting it was Cisco.
@account5
In Apple's case there could be some good ideas that they would like to implement... Mind you they might just do that anyways without even bothering to hold the patents. Maybe it was a ill thought through comment. When you belittle others does it make you feel a little better about yourself?
I don't like the orange color for HP.
@tehslax
i do
@fowenati
I agree, I think the cross between the HP logo and Palm's is cool.
@joebob
thats the old hp logo
@account5 looks like the NEW palm logo and its epic
@SteveyAyo erm, it's just a photoshop.... -_-
@Billy thanks... i didnt know that /sarcasm
ZOMG
If they don't name names, I'm going to assume Palm is making this all up.
@Spiraling Shape Fail. They probably don't have the legal right to name names moron.
That's really cool, although it would be nice if we could see the names.
If Company C was willing to pay $6-7, I guess that would be well over 1.5bn, it must have been a really big company. Dell or Lenovo would be my picks.
@DrDr
I'm goin with Dell as well.
@DrDr
Didn't you hear?
They merged into Delnovo
@DrDr I don't know, Company C seemed to be interested in patents and licencing webOS, that sounds a lot like webOS.