HP bought Palm after a five-company bidding war
Palm and HP seem like the happiest of corporate couples right now, but theirs was a heated courtship: according to Palm's latest statement to shareholders, a total of 16 companies were contacted about a deal, and HP was the winner of a month-long bidding war that involved serious offers from five companies -- a bidding war that involved Jon Rubinstein personally warning HP that it had to "significantly and immediately" increase its offer to remain in the game. What's more, HP's winning bid came in at just 20 cents a share more than its primary rival. Yeah, it's juicy -- read on for the full blow-by-blow.
[Thanks, Herman]
- Palm recognized that it was in trouble in early February, a few weeks before it posted its disappointing quarterly results, and on February 17 the company organized a committee headed by CEO Jon Rubinstein to investigate its options -- everything from licensing webOS to selling the company was on the table.
- From February 25 to April 1, Palm's management and consultants talked to a total of 16 companies about doing a deal. Five companies including HP ultimately got to the point of making offers, but only HP is publicly named in the filing -- the other suitors are referred to as Companies A, B, C, and D. Palm was most interested in HP and Companies A and B, while C and D initially only wanted to acquire Palm's patents. It's not clear when D dropped out.
- Palm's board of directors decided that selling the company was the best option in early March. The board thought about selling patents and / or licensing webOS, but decided against it because licensing would dilute the value of Palm's IP and fail to address long-term problems like scale and resources, and management was told to tell potential buyers that they should focus on an "outright acquisition." If you're keeping track, that's the exact opposite of what Jon Rubinstein was saying on April 22.
- HP made its first offer on April 13, for $4.75 per share or about a billion dollars, and requested a 30-day period of exclusive negotations. Company A followed up on April 15 with an offer of $600 million in cash, and Company B proposed a stock-for-stock deal that would take longer than the other deals.
- After receiving the offers from A and B, Palm told HP that it wouldn't give it an exclusivity period unless it improved its offer, and HP declined. At the same time, Palm decided that neither A nor B's proposal were of any value to its shareholders, and told both companies that they weren't competitive. A and B then dropped out of the game.
- On April 18 Company C offered between $6 and $7 per share with a proposed transaction to take place within 14 days, and on April 19 Palm sent both HP and Company C draft merger agreements.
- Palm and HP senior management held meetings on April 20 and 21, resulting in HP upping its offer to $5 per share on April 22. Later that day, Company C dropped its offer to $5.50 and sent Palm a revised merger agreement that contained several worrisome provisions, including a longer, riskier transaction timeline and a $60 million penalty if the deal didn't go through. Palm and Company C engaged in "extensive negotiations" from the 23rd to the 25th, but never managed to work out a compromise.
- While that was going on, on April 24th Jon Rubinstein and his advisors directly told HP that its offer wasn't competitive and that it had to "significantly and immediately" improve its offer in order to remain in the game. HP responded by raising its offer to $5.70 per share (the winning bid) later that day, and Jon Rubinstein told Company C that he had a better offer on April 25th.
- Company C told Palm it wasn't raising its acquisition offer, but offered to buy patents and take a nonexclusive license to webOS for $800 million. The board considered that proposal on the same day and declined.
- From that point on it was all HP -- the two companies negotiated from April 24 to April 28, when the merger was approved by Palm's outside accountants at Goldman Sachs and announced to the world.
[Thanks, Herman]























@Bearxor I'm not saying WebOS is bad, all I'm saying is that they brought to the game too late. And everybody knows they didn't advertise it well.
Ugh... slow day for gadget news
@painfull2006
Ugh, slow people commenting on gadget news.
@DrDr oh you must be one of those people who replies to there own comments, i see where you have become ever so easily confused.
@painfull2006 why is this slow? this is actually a really interesting post... Its crazy to think that HP outbid who we can assume is Apple MSFT and Google for this company, i think Gizmodo posted something about the ipod today you should go check that out
@painfull2006
Yes , i do reply to my own comments, but i also sometimes reply to other people's comments, as you may have noticed.
Don't take it too personally though, it was mostly a dig at what Josh Tops said to Nilay in the last podcast.
"Company C offered between $6 and $7 per share"
Why didn't Palm go with "Company
C"? sounds like they had objections beyond money and seems like they saw HP as a better fit since the get go.
@Tohe
There were terms that came along with the $6-$7 bid that were not favorable to Palm. What exactly the article doesn't say.
My guess is, there were bidders who wanted to divide the company and hawk off its individual parts for a profit. I don't know since I'm not familiar with these things.
I've said from day-one that I thought Dell would buy up Palm... I would be interested in at least finding out if they were in the running at all.
Culd you imagine if Sony bought (rosy) palm(and her five ugly sisters)
The psphone
Or
Ps callstation
@cherryboom
> There are thousands of you fucking geeks...
> LOL! Go ahead assholes!...
And people wonder why there are "Apple Haters"?
It is people like you that make it pretty easy to assume that anyone prancing around with an iDevice is a douche-bag. We know it is not true, but it is certainly the first thing that you think of. It is reinforced by watching actual douche-bags bringing an iPad into a bar and trying to impress people. The entire bar was laughing at him and his uber-kool hair.
@scobb
We call them iPhucks
Nobody mentioned Samsung, I definitley think they were one of the 5.
sounds like palm made up 4 other companies to boost their net gain
I am one of those companies, but I was busy fighting the Death Star when the 24-hour eBay auction.
@AckbarsFist ... sorry my transmission got cut off. Stupid Ewoks.
...ended.
So wait. Palm was going to pimp off it's patents to company "C"?
If they were sold to company "C" what would've happened to Palm?
interesting?
Thank god it wasn't Facebook.
FacePlam..
come on... just tell us who they are...
I bet Facebook was one of them.
We all know it was engadget......
I'm still psyched that HP bought this company. I can't wait to see what they do with the tablet space. HP knows how to make make a tablet and webOS was a fantastic operating system, just lacking in developer support.
All HP can hope for, now, is for Google not to cater to tablets as well as they catered to phones.
This is like one of those logic stories.
Why did Rubenstein completely and 100% flat out lie saying Palm can/will "go it alone" when they were in talks about the ONLY option being an "outright acquisition"?
Lying to the face of investors, trying to hide how bad things are with that inside knowledge seems just as bad as insider trading.
That's got to be illegal somehow?
@Johnny Rockets
He said Palm CAN go it alone, not will. It is leverage, telling potential buyers that Palm is willing to walk out if the deal isn't attractive enough.
@DrDr
That's not leverage pal. Those are some empty-ass words from a company haemorrhaging cash.
@Johnny Rockets It is illegal not to act in the financial interests of the company and its stockholders. Saying "we need a buyer" is not in either parties interest to announce publicly, it likely would've led to (more) short-selling which could potentially lead to a lower sale value. Also, they counter-acted this by actively talking with potential buyers. Lastly, the HP bid shot stock prices up over 20%, I don't think investors have anything to complain about.
@Johnny Rockets
You have to think of it as a game of chess. You still need to inspire confidence. If Palm had not said those things, the suitors would have never bidded more than 500 million.
As long as they aren't lying on official reports (like earnings/filings), companies can and will say just about anything. This includes politicians and public figures.
First lesson of dealing with the public is, even when weakened, one must never admit to that weakness; project strength.
Dude, you're getting a Palm
it's amazing how far in advance these things start happening. Nonetheless, I'm glad that Palm had a decent negotiating position when they sold to HP. Makes me significantly less worried about some company skeletonizing Palm and webOS, ruining both in the process. By any estimation, the future of the platform is much, much brighter now. Great stuff.
I'm willing to bet HTC were company D because they needed those patents
I'm definitely willing to bet Motorola were in there, especially as they have just acquired their own Mobile OS (which i think is a terrible idea btw) I believe they would have been extremely eager to get WebOS.
And I'm going to hazard a guess at Dell and Lenovo being the other two companies with Dell possibly being Company C
HP
HTC
Cisco
Lenovo
Apple
Apple and HTC only cared about patents.
Dell has too much going on launching Android and Win7 phones and doesn't need to worry about spending millions on obtaining their own OS when they don't know how much success they'll have with Win7 and Android in the coming months.
Facebook + Palm = Facepalm
..but I still can't figure out WHY
I am no more likely to buy a PalmOS phone than I was before...
actually LESS likely...
sorry charlie
every time I think of HP I am still reminded of Carly Fiorina.. bleah.. ugly thought
@obobo
First off, PalmOS != WebOS. They're two different operating systems.
Second, no one said it should? The merger has barely begun, and we likely won't see the results of the merger till at least the end of the summer, if not the end of the year at best.
Goldman does accounting?
It's so funny to see that guesses are only for HTC and Western companies ...
It wasn't apple!
Why the he'll would apple buy palm?
Apple already have their own OS
@facethefire because Palm has an amazing patent portfolio and if they bought them apple might actually be able to win a patent lawsuit... No one said they wanted Palm for the OS, while it IS by far the BEST mobile OS around, apple only wanted Palm's IP which was the real prize
@Doctor Kwame Nkrumah
Quantity of patents means nothing. What the patents actually are means everything. Apple has lots of patents, but Palm's been in this industry for almost 2 decades. If they enforced every patent they had, the iPhone would not exist.
@Doctor Kwame Nkrumah you stupid dummy? really so youve just given up on pretending to be smart then?
Maybe apple wanted the patents and at the same time get rid of the greatest threat to the iphone Os. :-0
Wanting patents in first place - overbidding, dropping price, bulling in negotiations and overpriced try at the end for the patents -> pretty much normal way Nokia does it's bidding.
Most probably HTC
Quite possibly the worst acquisition since AOL-TimeWarner. Guess only time will tell...