We already took a closer look at ASUS' minty fresh ROG G53 gaming laptop earlier in the week, but it was the outfit's 17-inch version (the G73JW, predictably) used to showcase a new partnership with SiBEAM. The aforesaid rigs are the world's first laptops to integrate SiBEAM's 60GHz WirelessHD technology, essentially doing exactly what Intel's WiDi does. For those unfamiliar with either technology, it enables the laptop to beam 1080p content directly to a receiver box (that tube you see above, which will be attached via HDMI in theory) from up to 30 meters away. Both machines are slated to be slinging HD sans cabling this Fall, though pricing for the upgraded beasts wasn't available just yet. Still, we were treated to a demonstration over at the outfit's Computex booth, and while it was dangerously close to the receiver, HD content still was streaming without a hitch. Granted, we've seen nothing but great things from other WirelessHD applications in the past, but it's still lovely to see it humming along so nicely within a full-fledged computer. Have a look yourself just past the break.
ASUS Introduces World's First Integrated WirelessHD Notebook PC with SiBEAM Technology
ASUS' New Notebooks Incorporate SiBEAM's WirelessHD 60GHz Technology Enabling Wireless Display for the Full HD Experience and ASUS Joins WirelessHD Consortium
2010 COMPUTEX TAIPEI
TAIPEI, Taiwan & SUNNYVALE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ASUS, a leading developer of notebook PCs, today announced that it has launched two new notebook computer models that incorporate SiBEAM, Inc.'s WirelessHD technology, enabling the most robust wireless display solution available. These notebook PCs are the world's first to feature WirelessHD technology. By integrating SiBEAM's advanced wireless video network chips on display mini-card (DMC) modules, these notebooks will offer an unprecedented wireless experience for consumers and gamers at compelling price points. ASUS' inclusion of WirelessHD ensures high-quality, uncompressed 1080p/60 video, robust transmission, and a latency-free experience for gaming and entertainment. Consumers will be able to be "untethered" and connect to the HD television, while still accessing the Internet and their home network without interference. ASUS also announces their new membership and participation in WirelessHD as an adopter.
"ASUS is proud to be the first company to introduce a notebook PC enabled with WirelessHD. ASUS has a long-standing history of listening to customers and then identifying technology to meet those needs"
ASUS is incorporating SiBEAM's WirelessHD technology in its new notebook PCs including the G73JW and the G53. Ideal for gaming, these models will provide consumers with a latency-free gaming experience with perfect video quality, as SiBEAM's WirelessHD technology is the only wireless display solution on the market that provides a lossless and uncompressed video connection. The addition of the technology will enable consumers to use the notebook with the HD television while at home or play games on the notebook while on the road. By operating in the 60GHz frequency band, the new products will not experience any interference with WiFi, cordless phones, or other wireless technologies, but rather permit simultaneous usage of these other wireless devices for Internet access and home networking.
"ASUS is proud to be the first company to introduce a notebook PC enabled with WirelessHD. ASUS has a long-standing history of listening to customers and then identifying technology to meet those needs," said Mr. P.C. Wang, Corporate Vice President & General Manager Notebook Business Unit from ASUS. "Having considered the needs of our customers, it's clear that there is a compelling proposition for connecting a notebook PC to a high definition display for gaming and entertainment. Given that consumers are increasingly using ASUS PCs for entertainment applications, connectivity to a wireless display becomes valuable. Having evaluated the range of wireless display options available, the WirelessHD solution and wireless chips from SiBEAM were most appealing to ASUS. Given that the leading provider of WirelessHD technology is SiBEAM, we were delighted to partner with them in bringing the first notebook PC to market with their support."
"SiBEAM is delighted to collaborate with ASUS in the introduction of their WirelessHD notebook PCs. ASUS is a leading manufacturer of notebook PCs and this launch reinforces that leadership position," said John LeMoncheck, president and CEO of SiBEAM, Inc. "As the WirelessHD entertainment experience expands from adapters to televisions to BD players to set-top boxes and now to portable devices including the notebook PC, the value of WirelessHD networks for consumers grows. This launch by ASUS not only represents the first notebook PC, but also the first portable devices to include WirelessHD, emphasizing the viability of 60GHz for portable entertainment platforms. There is clear value to the consumer in being able to connect their entertainment devices wirelessly to displays so that they can enjoy the content from their PC on the television wirelessly. SiBEAM is happy to support ASUS in such market expanding activities."
Being demonstrated at Computex in Taipei, Taiwan, this week, the ASUS notebooks will be made available in Fall 2010.
@Snarf101 I think they do get a ton of respect from gamers and the tech crowd. They're not a household name yet, but then again the average consumer just wants to be able to write Word docs and watch Youtube videos.
I don't see someone using this when there are so many 'connected' devices already out there and more coming to get your internet 'fix' to your TV using those methods. I can't see a need to stream HD from my laptop unless I'm missing what real benefit this thing has...
@wryker You're entirely missing the real benefit. The real benefit isn't wireless video from a portable computer to a stationary display, it's wireless from a stationary computer to a portable screen.
Imagine, if you will, an iPad-looking device which transmits touch input and can receive wireless HD video. It only has enough processing elements to receive and draw the image. A pure I/O device.
Imagine being able to harness the full processing power of any of your desktop computers within 30 meters (more with some form of repeater, I imagine) and display it on a slick, 1-pound screen that you can use from anywhere. Whether you're checking email or playing Crysis, the amount of computation required for your task has no impact on the size, weight, heat output and battery life of your portable device.
@Twile No, you're missing the point. None of those connected devices work with Hulu, Comcast Xfinity, ABC.com, ESPN, Olympics, etc etc. But I can watch all of them on my laptop. And with this I can stream that video to my TV and easily watch with multiple people.
@Fanfoot If you want to use WirelessHD as a way to avoid using a cable for traditional PC-TV connections, then cool, I'm all for fewer cables. There's no thing wrong with that.
But the real ultimate benefit of this, I feel, is to enable portable devices which are many times faster by doing the computation remotely and just streaming the input/output. You want to move pictures from your small computer to your big screen? Cool. I want to move them from my big computer to my small screen.
@Twile I still don't see the benefits. If I want to stream photos I have HD Tivo, PS3, Popcorn Hour, etc to do that - if I want to watch Netflix, Hulu, etc I can use a variety of devices for that too. If I want to play a game I'll use my PS3, or Xbox 360 or Wii. With more and more devices network 'ready' I don't see this being something to 'add'.
@wryker It's like you didn't even read my response. TV? PS3? Popcorn Hour? Xbox? Wii? Those are all stationary devices connected to stationary devices. If all you want to do is sit on a couch and use a huge screen, then fine--wirelessHD isn't for you.
As I tried to explain, I see it as more of a boon for people after portability. If executed as I explained, it would provide a wireless screen into any computer in your house. Lighter and cheaper than an iPad and faster than a laptop, with support for all PC applications? If you know a better way to accomplish that, then I'm all ears. And if you simply don't care for portable products then acknowledge that--it doesn't mean there's no real benefit, just that you don't use things that way.
@Twile The demo shows it going from the laptop to the big screen - not the other way around. If you're surmising the ability to sling from your TV to your portable device that is not how this device works. This is sending 'stuff' from your laptop to your TV wirelessly and I don't see that as any big deal especially since most TVs have an HD input on the front/side to accommodate such a need.
@wryker The benefit is for those people who connect their gaming laptops to their big screen TV for the obvious advantage of a bigger screen. Instead of connecting the laptop and TV using a hdmi cable, it's wireless. If you dont feel the need to stream HD content or to play PC games on your big screen TV then this is not for you
@wryker Of course you can't stream from the TV to your laptop. That doesn't even make sense. I'm not talking about this PARTICULAR set of products or the implementation they have here, I'm talking about the potential for technology that lets you stream 1080p video wirelessly.
I'll be interested in this when there's a mini PCIe card with both WiFi and Wireless HDMI on it you can upgrade any laptop to. Not buying a new laptop for this.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Asus needs more respect in the laptop game.
@Snarf101 I think they do get a ton of respect from gamers and the tech crowd. They're not a household name yet, but then again the average consumer just wants to be able to write Word docs and watch Youtube videos.
Sells stock in copper wire manufacturers, invests in wireless chip suppliers. ;)
@Oflife
Actually we should invest in pipe and drape for display booths, since that's the only place we see these darn things.
Bring something to market, people.
widi does not do no 1080p, the 3 widi's sold by best buy are lucky to get 1366x720, and they look awful.
only way you can get 1080p is through hdmi
I don't see someone using this when there are so many 'connected' devices already out there and more coming to get your internet 'fix' to your TV using those methods. I can't see a need to stream HD from my laptop unless I'm missing what real benefit this thing has...
@wryker You're entirely missing the real benefit. The real benefit isn't wireless video from a portable computer to a stationary display, it's wireless from a stationary computer to a portable screen.
Imagine, if you will, an iPad-looking device which transmits touch input and can receive wireless HD video. It only has enough processing elements to receive and draw the image. A pure I/O device.
Imagine being able to harness the full processing power of any of your desktop computers within 30 meters (more with some form of repeater, I imagine) and display it on a slick, 1-pound screen that you can use from anywhere. Whether you're checking email or playing Crysis, the amount of computation required for your task has no impact on the size, weight, heat output and battery life of your portable device.
@Twile No, you're missing the point. None of those connected devices work with Hulu, Comcast Xfinity, ABC.com, ESPN, Olympics, etc etc. But I can watch all of them on my laptop. And with this I can stream that video to my TV and easily watch with multiple people.
@Fanfoot If you want to use WirelessHD as a way to avoid using a cable for traditional PC-TV connections, then cool, I'm all for fewer cables. There's no thing wrong with that.
But the real ultimate benefit of this, I feel, is to enable portable devices which are many times faster by doing the computation remotely and just streaming the input/output. You want to move pictures from your small computer to your big screen? Cool. I want to move them from my big computer to my small screen.
@Twile I still don't see the benefits. If I want to stream photos I have HD Tivo, PS3, Popcorn Hour, etc to do that - if I want to watch Netflix, Hulu, etc I can use a variety of devices for that too. If I want to play a game I'll use my PS3, or Xbox 360 or Wii. With more and more devices network 'ready' I don't see this being something to 'add'.
@wryker It's like you didn't even read my response. TV? PS3? Popcorn Hour? Xbox? Wii? Those are all stationary devices connected to stationary devices. If all you want to do is sit on a couch and use a huge screen, then fine--wirelessHD isn't for you.
As I tried to explain, I see it as more of a boon for people after portability. If executed as I explained, it would provide a wireless screen into any computer in your house. Lighter and cheaper than an iPad and faster than a laptop, with support for all PC applications? If you know a better way to accomplish that, then I'm all ears. And if you simply don't care for portable products then acknowledge that--it doesn't mean there's no real benefit, just that you don't use things that way.
@Twile The demo shows it going from the laptop to the big screen - not the other way around. If you're surmising the ability to sling from your TV to your portable device that is not how this device works. This is sending 'stuff' from your laptop to your TV wirelessly and I don't see that as any big deal especially since most TVs have an HD input on the front/side to accommodate such a need.
@wryker
The benefit is for those people who connect their gaming laptops to their big screen TV for the obvious advantage of a bigger screen. Instead of connecting the laptop and TV using a hdmi cable, it's wireless. If you dont feel the need to stream HD content or to play PC games on your big screen TV then this is not for you
@wryker Of course you can't stream from the TV to your laptop. That doesn't even make sense. I'm not talking about this PARTICULAR set of products or the implementation they have here, I'm talking about the potential for technology that lets you stream 1080p video wirelessly.
Meh @ wireless HD via laptop.. would be way more interested in full wireless HD in blu-ray players and HTPCs.
There ain't much reason for such tech to be too expensive.
They took it off the spaceship decades ago..
But seriously, I will probably just wait for the cheap asian version with a USB 3.0 dongle and a box on the other end with HDMI for the TV.
I have not heard anything about that last product at all - but if it does not show up I will be as shocked as shocked can be.
I'll be interested in this when there's a mini PCIe card with both WiFi and Wireless HDMI on it you can upgrade any laptop to. Not buying a new laptop for this.
i have that same ASUS monitor
I want to build a HTPC with WiDi/Wireless HD.
Why are they tied only to laptops? :(