Seagate Momentus XT hybrid hard drive review
Earlier this year, Seagate promised to flip the 2.5-inch HDD industry upside-down, but it wouldn't do so by using an SSD in sheep's clothing. Rather, it'd be doling out a new breed of hard drive, one that actually has a pinch of pure, unadulterated NAND inside for picking up the pace in certain scenarios. The idea of a hybrid hard drive isn't totally new, but the Momentus XT is one of the first hybrid HDDs to actually make it out of the lab and into the hands of consumers. The most intriguing aspect of the drive is the price -- at around $130, it's just under half as pricey as Seagate's conventional 500GB Momentus 7200.4. That uptick in price isn't nothing, but it's still far less than what you'd pay for a 2.5-inch SSD with half the capacity. We've already shown you the benchmarks, so we figured we'd slap this bad boy in our main rig for a few weeks to see if we actually noticed any real-world performance increases to justify the cost. Head on past the break for our two pennies.
The Momentus XT is a curious beast. It actually doesn't reveal its true colors when taxed in standard benchmarks, which makes a longer-term, real-world evaluation of it that much more important. You see, this 500 gigger actually has 4GB of NAND onboard, but given just how small 4GB is in relation to the other 496GB, the drive obviously has to be extra choosy when determining what goes where. Standard benchmarks will prove that a straight-up read / write on this drive is similar to any other 7,200RPM drive of this caliber. Frankly, there's no real gains if you're using the drive to shuffle 30GB files from server to server each day. The whole point of this drive is to make "the little things" snappier in everyday use for the Average Joe / Jane, largely by evaluating what applications consumers use most and then dedicating the NAND for those high-use apps.
Needless to say, there's not really a great benchmark tool out for that kind of work. This all sounds fine and dandy in theory, but the real question is how does it act in practice. We swapped our standard 7,200RPM drive (also 500GB) out for this unit, cloning the contents along the way. Upon boot, we noticed a 1 - 2 second improvement in how long it took to show us a useable desktop; hardly Earth-shattering, but a decent start. From there, we fired up Firefox, Photoshop CS5, Skitch, TweetDeck and iTunes in succession. Again, a 1 - 2 second improvement in total load time. But after using the apps for a bit, we shut our machine down and rebooted, doing the same song and dance all over again. And again. And again. We went through this process four total times, with each one getting a bit quicker when it came to load time. After we'd given it ample opportunity to grasp our preferred flow, we noticed a 6 - 8 second improvement in total load time. That may not sound like a lot, but percentage wise it's hardly worth sneezing at.
So, if booting up apps was quicker, how's about the actual in-app performance? We used Lightroom 2 as our main test bench here, selecting 300 RAW files and waiting as graphical representations of the color balance lit up in the corner. The difference here was striking. On the prior drive, it took a few seconds per image to display graphical elements about any given image; on the Momentus XT, they popped up instantly. One area where we didn't see such a huge increase in performance was during renders; we exported a 32GB iMovie project into a .mov file for easier transport, and the total time for the task to complete was essentially the same on both drives. Granted, we fully expected this type of behavior, but it goes to show that 4GB of NAND won't exactly alter your universe when looking at chores that require lengthy reads and writes.
All told, we'd have a tough time not recommending the Momentus XT, particularly the 500GB version. If you're in no need of that much space, we'd almost recommend saving up for a pure SSD at 256GB or less. But currently, the price difference between this drive and the half-as-big solid state drives makes Seagate's new alternative that much more attractive. We'd also recommend this only for those who are looking for performance gains in the simplest of tasks; opening your email client, sifting through images in Lightroom, switching between the ten apps you have open, etc. Comically enough, this performance-oriented drive best reveals its talents in the most mundane of tasks, but like it or not, that's what the bulk of us are buried in from9 8 to 5. If you've outgrown your existing laptop HDD, and you need a capacious replacement, the Momentus XT is an option that's worth the price premium in our estimation. It may not make your Core 2 Duo feel like a Core i7, but it'll definitely get your through the day with a few less pinwheels / hourglasses.
The Momentus XT is a curious beast. It actually doesn't reveal its true colors when taxed in standard benchmarks, which makes a longer-term, real-world evaluation of it that much more important. You see, this 500 gigger actually has 4GB of NAND onboard, but given just how small 4GB is in relation to the other 496GB, the drive obviously has to be extra choosy when determining what goes where. Standard benchmarks will prove that a straight-up read / write on this drive is similar to any other 7,200RPM drive of this caliber. Frankly, there's no real gains if you're using the drive to shuffle 30GB files from server to server each day. The whole point of this drive is to make "the little things" snappier in everyday use for the Average Joe / Jane, largely by evaluating what applications consumers use most and then dedicating the NAND for those high-use apps.
Needless to say, there's not really a great benchmark tool out for that kind of work. This all sounds fine and dandy in theory, but the real question is how does it act in practice. We swapped our standard 7,200RPM drive (also 500GB) out for this unit, cloning the contents along the way. Upon boot, we noticed a 1 - 2 second improvement in how long it took to show us a useable desktop; hardly Earth-shattering, but a decent start. From there, we fired up Firefox, Photoshop CS5, Skitch, TweetDeck and iTunes in succession. Again, a 1 - 2 second improvement in total load time. But after using the apps for a bit, we shut our machine down and rebooted, doing the same song and dance all over again. And again. And again. We went through this process four total times, with each one getting a bit quicker when it came to load time. After we'd given it ample opportunity to grasp our preferred flow, we noticed a 6 - 8 second improvement in total load time. That may not sound like a lot, but percentage wise it's hardly worth sneezing at.
So, if booting up apps was quicker, how's about the actual in-app performance? We used Lightroom 2 as our main test bench here, selecting 300 RAW files and waiting as graphical representations of the color balance lit up in the corner. The difference here was striking. On the prior drive, it took a few seconds per image to display graphical elements about any given image; on the Momentus XT, they popped up instantly. One area where we didn't see such a huge increase in performance was during renders; we exported a 32GB iMovie project into a .mov file for easier transport, and the total time for the task to complete was essentially the same on both drives. Granted, we fully expected this type of behavior, but it goes to show that 4GB of NAND won't exactly alter your universe when looking at chores that require lengthy reads and writes.
All told, we'd have a tough time not recommending the Momentus XT, particularly the 500GB version. If you're in no need of that much space, we'd almost recommend saving up for a pure SSD at 256GB or less. But currently, the price difference between this drive and the half-as-big solid state drives makes Seagate's new alternative that much more attractive. We'd also recommend this only for those who are looking for performance gains in the simplest of tasks; opening your email client, sifting through images in Lightroom, switching between the ten apps you have open, etc. Comically enough, this performance-oriented drive best reveals its talents in the most mundane of tasks, but like it or not, that's what the bulk of us are buried in from






























Sounds cool. Can't wait for laptop manufacturers to start including this in off-the-shelf laptops.
Look at the engadget editors! They even hold a hdd like a smartphone!!
@gargle
Hard drive gate is a big problem! That grip will reduce reception on all models, not just ours!
@brian515 Haa Engadget had to abide by its contract with Apple and Show the HDD atop of a Apple Product.. Very Sneaky Engadget
@gargle They better put a bumper on that thing or it will lose data!
@gargle
They're holding it wrong ahahahahahAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Aren't I funny guys hahahahahah?????????????????????????????????
/s
@Indefinite Implosion
Hey, I'm open to constructive criticism, but you don't have to be mean. And come on, I can't be the only person annoyed by these stupid comments saying "They're holding it wrong", it isn't funny anymore!
Actually, on that note, it was never funny at all.
@Indefinite Implosion
Please go away?
@brian515 Still needs more than the 4GB for the cache. I would want at least 8-16GB cache. Enough to hold the entire OS and main apps used.
@brian515
I had one of these in my laptop a while ago. Honestly, it's very hard to notice any gain from the regular Seagate Momentus 7200rpm I had before that.
@brian515. ..
Geez anybody have any comments on the actual item being reviewed? Forums at notebookreviews.com and newegg mention inconclusive speed and also noise issues. Looks like another engadget gloss over: (
@liftedngifted1 Yeah, that was weird. It's not even a real size comparison, just a random shot of the HDD sitting on the top of an unknown macbook.
@gargle
the editors probably by now have conditioned themselves to hold all rectangular shaped objects like a smartphone to pretentiously unbias towards any one company
@brian515 About a month ago i purchased the Seagate Momentus XT Kit off of seagates website...yes--direct from seagate. When the drive showed up at my front door, i was pretty excited. But that didn't last long. I opened the box and found a regular seagate momentus inside. Turns out that their website was inappropriately advertising the XT for sale direct though them. The add to cart link added the regular momentus to the cart.
Anyways, now on to the buttttttter:
During the RMA process, i was speaking so a guy named sean (i believe?) who was head of sales. He told me that the lack of availability was due to DELL AND HP BUYING UP VIRTUALLY EVERY DRIVE THAT CAMW OUR OF ASSEMBLY.
I asked how many, and he said there were well over a million circulating. Great news!! Look for Dell and HP to offer this drive soon!
@jamesyboy came out of assembly*
@jamesyboy Your bad luck, then; there have been no availability issues at a wide variety of retailers. NewEgg, for example, has all three capacities (250/320/500) in stock.
I'm not sure why anybody would BUY the first two, though. The 250GB drive is $100, and the 500GB drive is $130. There's virtually no price difference between the drives.
@Engadget "Upon boot, we noticed a 1 - 2 second improvement"
I'm going to wildly suggest that you didn't simply because any boot will change by that amount or more completely at random.
If the drive can keep working after the Flash fails then ok but if not, I just see it as another component that can go wrong. There are minor improvements but an SSD alone is way better just because you can get the read/write benefits on everything.
As mentioned above, the only way this would be useful is if the Flash part was an 8-16GB part and you could install the OS and apps on it manually - like it would show up as a separate partition.
This way, even if the Flash failed, you migrate the OS to the HDD part.
For me personally, I've ordered a standard 7200rpm Seagate for now and when we get 22nm SSD next year ($1.50 per GB), I will get a 256GB Intel SSD for $349, maybe the year after.
Total recall is on.
Does the transfer rate drop when you hold it with the death grip?
@Vercingetorix Yeah he's Holding it wrong :)
@Vercingetorix
I don't own an iPhone, but please, it's getting old. Just like the Kanye comments.
@maythetechbewithyou
Now, iPhone 4 Death Grip Jokes, I'm really happy for you, and I'm going to let you finish, but Kanye West Interrupting people is the most over used joke of *all time*!
@Vercingetorix I dont think the iPhone Deathgrip comments will ever stop, becuase when the EVO came out all the Apple Fanboys would not stop commenting that the battery life sucked and how the Camera sucked so you Apple Fanboys brought this upon yourselves...
@liftedngifted1
Thats the thing. Apply Fanboys arent the only ones getting tired of it. Just like we got tired of the comments about the Evo, You Blew It, Will it Blend, and all the other overly (and most of the time poorly) used "joke."
Granted sometimes they are funny in the right context. This wouldnt be on of them.
@liftedngifted1
Not really. The battery life does suck. The camera does suck. Stating facts doesn't bring anything "upon ourselves". Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to repeat the "holding it wrong" joke, are they? No, that's all on you, buddy.
@Jack
Hey, it's Jack, from Lord of the Flies!
Piggy, Piggy! Take his glasses!
@maxxorz Oddly enough, combining the two for satirical purposes seems to recommence the lols.
@maxxorz
oh no, you didn't
Thanks for doing this.
@rhimbu
The thing I don't get is why did they do this on a Mac? OS X doesn't take advantage of hybrid HDDs. They should've done this with Windows 7 which takes full advantage of hybrid HDDs.
And no that's not a fanboy statement, it's just a simple fact.
@insky Are you talking about 7's ability to speed up tasks with a flash drive? If so that doesnt apply because this hard drive takes care of the hybrid aspect itself so it is pretty operating system independent.
@rhimbu
That's ReadyBoost. I'm talking about ReadyDrive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReadyDrive#ReadyDrive
@insky And you're still wrong with respect to this drive. The OS is not involved in the optimization, population, or usage of this cache. The drive determines which block-level elements are accessed most frequently within a tolerance limit so as not to wear out the memory, and stores those elements additionally in its 4GB cache.
Again, the OS is not involved, neither ReadyBoost, nor ReadyDrive will do anything with this drive.
Now I kinda feel like I was too hasty buying that Intel x-25-m ssd for the lappy...
@Wokis
Rest assured that you were not. There is still no comparing a hybrid drive like this with a full-on SSD experience.
@inept
That would have added a nice touch to this article. Swap in the intel x-25m and give the same comparison. Unfortunately, that part was left out.
@Wokis I have a momentus XT in my envy 14 and it's nothing fancy.
Boot and application startup is a little quicker but it's nowhere near the night and day difference a quick SSD can make.
I don't regret the purchase but will definitely be upgrading to an SSD within the next couple years.
@TheImirOfGroofunkistan
How is it relevant? Everybody knows SSDs are faster. The important part is that this is $130, and a 500GB SSD is over $1,000.
@Jack
It's relevant because people keep assuming that their Boot/OS volume needs to be hundreds of GB's or even TB in size.
It doesn't...
Most people only need 40GB, then they can get 1 or more 500GB+ HDDs for storage/bu/content etc!
Is this more than a regular hard drive with a ReadyDrive cache built in?
If they put in 16 GB there would be no reason for me to buy a SSD.
@rhimbu
Or at least 8GB. I'm guessing the next models will have that much.
I want to know what kind of performance I could get while dual-booting windows 7 and OS X.
@Timerider I was think the same thing. I think if you split your time 50/50 between both operating systems you would lose much of the speed advantage but I'm sure there would still be some. I'm currently on a PC but I figure when i get my mac i'll probably spend most of the time in OS X anyways so it shouldn't matter much for me.
I've had this installed in my 13" Macbook Pro for a few months. Works great!
RE: Opening sentence:
Did you intentionally set up a that's what she said joke?
@Professor Hubert J Farnsworth
"Earlier this year, Seagate promised to flip the 2.5-inch HDD industry upside-down, but it wouldn't do so by using an SSD in sheep's clothing."
I don't get it... How is that what she said at all? Your female must be very boring and non-sexual.
I thought SSD's were still much faster!?
@Juggernaut408
They are that's why its a hybrid.
@Juggernaut408 They are. What does that have to do with anything? If you can't compromise on the price then you compromise on the functionality.
I am surprised it took Engadget this long to review it. This HDD is superhot right now, so many positive reviews all over the web, form C-net to bloggers.