Latest in Culture

Image credit: Timothy A. Clary via Getty Images

NYT: Apple engineers may quit before cracking the iPhone

The company's rebellious, anti-authority culture might provide an unexpected roadblock to the FBI.

Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Save
Timothy A. Clary via Getty Images

The spirit of anarchy and anti-establishment still runs strong at Apple. Rather than comply with the government's requests to develop a so-called "GovtOS" to unlock the iPhone 5c of San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook, The New York Times' half-dozen sources say that some software engineers may quit instead. "It's an independent culture and a rebellious one," former Apple engineering manager Jean-Louis Gassée tells NYT. "If the government tries to compel testimony or action from these engineers, good luck with that."

Former senior product manager for Apple's security and privacy division Window Snyder agrees. "If someone attempts to force them to work on something that's outside their personal values, they can expect to find a position that's a better fit somewhere else."

In another instance of Apple's company culture clashing with what the federal government demands, the development teams are apparently relatively siloed off from one another. It isn't until a product gets closer to release that disparate teams like hardware and software engineers come together for finalizing a given gizmo. NYT notes that the team of six to 10 engineers needed to develop the back door doesn't currently exist and that forcing any sort of collaboration would be incredibly difficult, again, due to how Apple works internally.

It sounds like that would be a ways off, though. Apple is expected to exhaust its legal options before relenting to Uncle Sam's pressures to crack the device open. Another option that could be pretty far-fetched would be if every Cupertino engineer capable of writing code quit their jobs. That'd show that Apple was trying to comply with the federal request, but it wouldn't have to follow through because it wasn't possible to do so.

The most realistic situation on the government's part? Probably something similar to what the it did with Lavabit during the Edward Snowden kerfuffle: daily $10,000 penalties until the company complied. Rather than doing that, though, it shut down instead. Whether or not Apple, one of the biggest companies in the world, will follow suit remains to be seen.

From around the web